| Revision as of 22:56, 3 February 2010 view sourceNothughthomas (talk | contribs)566 edits →antiuser← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:16, 4 February 2010 view source Tbsdy lives (talk | contribs)7,977 edits →antiuser: remove attack reviewNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ''' Reviews ''' | ''' Reviews ''' | ||
| *'''Grade 6/10 (Good But Needs Improvement)''' - Though generally well-intentioned, ] often gets carried away with advancing a POV to the exception of being able to consider or digest more mainstream, and academically accepted, ideas. As well, he can be quick to take umbrage and will jump to filing ANI complaints at the slightest hint of offense. He might benefit from a thorough review of Misplaced Pages policies and procedures and learning to walk away when things get heated instead of trying to get in "one last punch", but, ultimately, has the potential to evolve into a very good WP contributor within the next few years. ] (]) 19:02, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :'''Comment:''' Please note that ] is currently involved in ] that I have started about their reactions to my correcting them regarding speedy deletion criteria. The user has a pattern of overreacting and attacking users when disagreed with and has been blocked three times for that very reason. I stand by my actions and contend that at no time I "advanc(ed) a POV" or disregarded "mainstream, academically accepted ideas" as the user so suggests. Please refer to ] for more information on the situation. <span style="color:green;background:green">X</span><span style="color:white;background:white">X</span><span style="color:red;background:red">X</span> ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 21:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::This is an example of what I was talking about in my above review of the contributor. See: WP:NOTTHEM. If contributor works on this (WP:NOTTHEM) a little, however, he can be a great and valuable asset to Misplaced Pages. ] (]) 22:35, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::] is for unblock requests. This is an editor review. <span style="color:green;background:green">X</span><span style="color:white;background:white">X</span><span style="color:red;background:red">X</span> ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 22:36, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::I don't really think it's constructive to get in "one last punch" in an editor review. You solicited feedback and I provided it. You are welcome to acknowledge or disregard it as you see fit.If you are not concerned with the spirit of WP:NOTTHEM (1. do not attack other editors, 2. do not make excuses, 3. AGF, 4. assume AGF), but only the legalese and letter of WP:NOTTHEM, that is certainly your right. In my editor review of you I said you were "GOOD." If you only want people to grade you as "EXCELLENT" or "PERFECT", you may want to state that at the outset. Thanks. ] (]) 22:40, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::::I accept any and all reviews - that's what this process is for. I was only pointing out that your comments might be biased due to the incident and the subsequent report. <span style="color:green;background:green">X</span><span style="color:white;background:white">X</span><span style="color:red;background:red">X</span> ''']''' <sup>]</sup> 22:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::::I assure you, I can maintain absolute impartiality, even when a user is "block shopping" me to admins. The fact that I graded you as "Good" is, I think, evidence of that. However, your explanation is noted and acknowledged without prejudice. ] (]) 22:56, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
| *I really like the answer to number 2. As far as edits go, having 44% to mainspace and 45% to user talk is really good balance, for vandal fighting. Your is great as well. You've done a lot of CSDs and AIV reporting and from what I have looked through, you've done well; accurate use of both will be an asset should you ever go for admin. My advice to you would be to keep 3RR in mind, and maybe explore some other things like ]. <small>Disclaimer:My advice is usually wrong.</small> Happy editing! <!--And I sympathise with you re the user who first reviewed you, having seen some of her edits...--><span style="font-family:Tahoma">]</span>]<sup>]</sup> 20:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | *I really like the answer to number 2. As far as edits go, having 44% to mainspace and 45% to user talk is really good balance, for vandal fighting. Your is great as well. You've done a lot of CSDs and AIV reporting and from what I have looked through, you've done well; accurate use of both will be an asset should you ever go for admin. My advice to you would be to keep 3RR in mind, and maybe explore some other things like ]. <small>Disclaimer:My advice is usually wrong.</small> Happy editing! <!--And I sympathise with you re the user who first reviewed you, having seen some of her edits...--><span style="font-family:Tahoma">]</span>]<sup>]</sup> 20:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:16, 4 February 2010
antiuser
antiuser (talk · contribs · count) I've been on Misplaced Pages since 2005, mostly making edits or creating articles for subjects I'm knowledgeable about and monitoring recent changes and new page creation. I'm really just curious about my standing as an editor. XXX antiuser 01:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Questions
- What are your primary contributions to Misplaced Pages? Are there any about which you are particularly pleased? Why?
- Lately it's mostly been recent changes/new page monitoring. I think I did a pretty good job on Gol Transportes Aéreos Flight 1907 right as the story was beginning to develop. Since I'm fluent in Portuguese, I was able to keep the article updated with accurate info coming from reliable sources in the Brazilian news media.
- Have you been in any disputes over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
- Not really. When I make substantial changes to an article I make sure I'm sourcing my edits properly, and when I perform multiple reversions to an article, it's usually because of vandalism. As far as stress goes, Misplaced Pages is not my job - if it begins to stress me out, I walk away and go do something else.
Reviews
- I really like the answer to number 2. As far as edits go, having 44% to mainspace and 45% to user talk is really good balance, for vandal fighting. Your edit summary use is great as well. You've done a lot of CSDs and AIV reporting and from what I have looked through, you've done well; accurate use of both will be an asset should you ever go for admin. My advice to you would be to keep 3RR in mind, and maybe explore some other things like WP:AfC. Disclaimer:My advice is usually wrong. Happy editing! SS✞ 20:34, 3 February 2010 (UTC)