| Revision as of 09:31, 17 January 2010 editGlenfarclas (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers14,577 edits →Battle of Stuart's Pond: nice work← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:15, 6 February 2010 edit undoJohn Quincy Adding Machine (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,069 edits →Talk:Passport: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| FYI, ]. ]''' (]) 09:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | FYI, ]. ]''' (]) 09:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| *By the way, if I didn't make it clear in my AfD nomination, good work smoking that out! I don't know you ever came across it. ]''' (]) 09:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | *By the way, if I didn't make it clear in my AfD nomination, good work smoking that out! I don't know you ever came across it. ]''' (]) 09:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| Several weeks ago, you expressed support for removing visa-free articles from passport pages. This discussion has been continuing from that point on, on ], and eventually only between three users. Several days ago, {{user|Ozguroot}}, a suspected sockpuppet, ] 15 users, all who have expressed a negative viewpoint, to come to the discussion and utterly overwhelm a budding and tenuously reached compromise. This is the second time he has canvassed users to the dispute. Prior to the canvassing incident, I requested mediation at ], with no response. I have reported Ozguroot's canvassing at ], again with no response. I am utterly disheartened by the community apathy, it seems our dislike for the "dramafest at ANI" has become a disdain for dispute resolution of any kind, an apathy for processes of justice. To make sure the weeks' worth of discussion at ] aren't undermined by an egomaniacal nationalist, a sockpuppet, and their canvassed hordes, and in light of the utter apathy I have received from the community, I am notifying all editors who expressed support for the proposal. I am aware of the tenuous ledge on which I am pirouetting, but in the absence of better advice (as sought at ANI), I am sure you will agree it is only fair to attempt to balance the canvassed users who expressed a negative viewpoint. Not to be melodramatic, but to quote Edmund Burke: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing". —] 14:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:15, 6 February 2010
- This page last archived January 11, 2010.
I undid your revert
Re this revert - please see WP:INTDABLINK: To link to a disambiguation page (rather than to a page whose topic is a specific meaning), link to the title that includes the text "(disambiguation)", even if that's a redirect – for example, link to the redirect America (disambiguation) rather than the target page at "America". (If the redirect does not yet exist, create it and tag it with {{R to disambiguation page}}. Thanks. 92.4.81.224 (talk) 04:00, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- No problem - thanks for taking the time to have a look and for the reply. 92.4.81.224 (talk) 02:38, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: American Wedding 2
Hello ArmadniGeneral. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of American Wedding 2, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G3 Not an obvious hoax. Try PROD or AfD to get other editors' opinions. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz /Stalk 05:25, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
Battle of Stuart's Pond
FYI, now at AfD. Glenfarclas (talk) 09:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
- By the way, if I didn't make it clear in my AfD nomination, good work smoking that out! I don't know you ever came across it. Glenfarclas (talk) 09:31, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
Talk:Passport
Several weeks ago, you expressed support for removing visa-free articles from passport pages. This discussion has been continuing from that point on, on Talk:Passport, and eventually only between three users. Several days ago, Ozguroot (talk · contribs), a suspected sockpuppet, canvassed 15 users, all who have expressed a negative viewpoint, to come to the discussion and utterly overwhelm a budding and tenuously reached compromise. This is the second time he has canvassed users to the dispute. Prior to the canvassing incident, I requested mediation at Misplaced Pages:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2010-02-04/Passport, with no response. I have reported Ozguroot's canvassing at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Ozguroot_canvassing_again, again with no response. I am utterly disheartened by the community apathy, it seems our dislike for the "dramafest at ANI" has become a disdain for dispute resolution of any kind, an apathy for processes of justice. To make sure the weeks' worth of discussion at Talk:Passport aren't undermined by an egomaniacal nationalist, a sockpuppet, and their canvassed hordes, and in light of the utter apathy I have received from the community, I am notifying all editors who expressed support for the proposal. I am aware of the tenuous ledge on which I am pirouetting, but in the absence of better advice (as sought at ANI), I am sure you will agree it is only fair to attempt to balance the canvassed users who expressed a negative viewpoint. Not to be melodramatic, but to quote Edmund Burke: "All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing". —what a crazy random happenstance 14:15, 6 February 2010 (UTC)