| Revision as of 21:17, 29 July 2010 view sourceDrakesfamily (talk | contribs)16 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:50, 31 July 2010 view source Skomorokh (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,990 edits →Careful: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 107: | Line 107: | ||
| Kindest regards, ] (]) 21:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC) | Kindest regards, ] (]) 21:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Careful == | |||
| , shouldn't have been reverted, and the editor didn't deserve any warning. Regards, ] 17:50, 31 July 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:50, 31 July 2010
Amaury is
Somewhere
 | It is approximately 12:52 PM where this user lives. |
| vn-180 | This user talk page has been vandalized 180 times. |
I screwed up, just to say hello, or anything else! I won't bite! I have a few requests that I hope you'll respect while posting here:
|
For 2009 discussions, please visit the following link:
http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Donald_Duck/2009
January 2010
Discussions archived
An archive of January 2010 discussions can be found here.
February 2010
Discussions archived
An archive of February 2010 discussions can be found here.
March 2010
Discussions archived
An archive of March 2010 discussions can be found here.
April 2010
Discussions archived
An archive of April 2010 discussions can be found here.
May 2010
Discussions archived
An archive of May 2010 discussions can be found here.
June 2010
Discussions archived
An archive of June 2010 discussions can be found here.
July 2010
Talk pages
Please read WP:TALK. Talk pages are meant for article improvement. May I quote: "Stay on topic: Talk pages are for discussing the article, not for general conversation about the article's subject (much less other subjects). Keep discussions focused on how to improve the article. Irrelevant discussions are subject to removal."
Your question belongs to a fan forum or other kind of forum.--Fogeltje (talk) 20:58, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked questions on talk pages here before, and no one had a problem with them. - Donald Duck (talk) 21:00, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
- According to the policy it shouldn't be done. It's possible that some users don't have a problem with it or are not aware of the policy, but it clutters talk pages.--Fogeltje (talk) 21:02, 1 July 2010 (UTC)
Don't abuse the "minor edit" flag
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to List of The Amanda Show episodes, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 04:19, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
User:ST47/test
User:ST47/test is a test page. Look at the history, and please don't revert more edits from the test suite on that or related pages. – mike@enwiki:~$ 16:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I figured that out after the revert. Thanks for the message, though. - Donald Duck (talk) 16:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
It has been confirmed by national tv. you should consider my changes. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.154.125.168 (talk) 16:14, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
http://www.geo.tv/7-28-2010/69111.htm
read this link —Preceding unsigned comment added by 119.154.125.168 (talk) 16:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Dear Donald Duck,
Sorry if I have caused you some trouble, I can assure you that it was not intentional.
I am a 'new boy' trying my very best to contribute to some Misplaced Pages pages, but aparently upsetting you on the way. I really cannot undestand why you keep changing the wording on my amendments when they are correct and what you are changing them to is completely wrong. I didn't, and still don't, fully understand the system, or why an administrator felt the need to accuse me of vandalism and threatened to disconnect me.
So, I eventually found out how to sign in as a new memeber, so that you could see who I was and that I was a genuine contributor, but you still changed entries that I made, in particular you insisted on putting "Drake's family's website" in place of "Drakesfamily website" & "Drax, Dracass, Dracas & Drakes family website", both of which are correct. This website has nothing to do with the name 'Drake'. You have also removed textual corrections that I made the link with william of Orange and the use of the Ice House at Charborough Park.
If it is easy for you to explain where I am going wrong, I'd be delighted to hear from you. If not, and if I am just being a nuisance, please let me know how to resign my membership and I will give up.
Kindest regards, Drakesfamily (talk) 21:17, 29 July 2010 (UTC)
Careful
This wasn't vandalism, shouldn't have been reverted, and the editor didn't deserve any warning. Regards, Skomorokh 17:50, 31 July 2010 (UTC)