Misplaced Pages

User talk:Richrakh: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:59, 1 October 2010 editHasteur (talk | contribs)31,857 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 17:59, 22 November 2010 edit undoBalph Eubank (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers12,170 edits Notice: Not signing posts. using TWNext edit →
Line 52: Line 52:
== Convicted politicians listed at ] == == Convicted politicians listed at ] ==
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Convicted politicians'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 19:59, 1 October 2010 (UTC) An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect ]. Since you had some involvement with the ''Convicted politicians'' redirect, you might want to participate in ] (if you have not already done so). <!-- from Template:RFDNote --> ] (]) 19:59, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

== November 2010 ==
] Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to ] and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you must ] by typing four ]s ( &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button ] located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. <!-- Template:uw-tilde --> - ] ] 17:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 17:59, 22 November 2010

Re: Political scandals of the United States

If you are going to add a lot of information, you might be well-served to cite every addition. I've had to revert some of your edits - on at least one occasion to reinstate information that you claimed you could not find (the Americorps thang). You might consider using the discussion page to run some of these things by other editors. - Arcayne () 17:40, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, I'll do that.````

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 07:47, 17 December 2008 (UTC)

Larry Craig

I fixed your reference problem at Larry Craig. You might want to take a look to see how it's done. However the detail you added doens't appear necessary for the intro, and is already in the body of the text. Maybe it'd be better to leave it out of the lead?   Will Beback  talk  21:25, 28 June 2009 (UTC)

Scandal article

I see you do a lot of good work on the Scandal article. Good. But do not assume you own the article and can override others, including myself, who are also allowed to make their contributions to it. Thanks. Hmains (talk) 03:37, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

I do not own this article. Neither do you. Do not assume that you can make major changes without discussion. If you check the discussion page, I've commented on numerous issues there. You should do the same. You've made a lot of changes here, most of which I haven't touched, but to combine the executive and legislative branch and then add a judicial branch by itself without regard to the date or administrations it occured seems very confusing to me. I happen to like it the way it is, which is how I found it. You could possibly start three new articles, one for each of the three branches, all seperate. That seems to be the way you're heading.

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Happyme22 (talk) 01:23, 3 December 2009 (UTC).

Proposed deletion of Political sex scandals of the united states

The article Political sex scandals of the united states has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Reexists as a nicer form with diff. captialization.

While all contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andewz111 (no 'r') (PingusTM) - Linux rulez! (nudge me) 06:02, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Political Sex scandals of the United States

Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Misplaced Pages has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Misplaced Pages and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images in violation of our biographies of living persons policy will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Thank you.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines. Aboutmovies (talk) 08:55, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion discussion

Hi! As I have mentioned you in a discussion about speedy deletion (with regards to your article about political sex scandals in the US), I thought it best to let you know. Pleased be assured that it isn't your actions that are being discussed, more about the categories and warnings used when articles are created in good faith but are largely negative and unsourced.

You are welcome to join in the discussion - it can be found here. Stephen! 13:20, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

James O'Keefe

The use of verbatim, unattributed quotations ("O'Keefe was to record a video of the following script before Boudreau arrived", from ) in articles is considered plagiarism. Whenever you incorporate the exact text of a source into an article, please provide appropriate attribution in the form of quotation marks, <blockquote>, or similar. Also, Misplaced Pages style guidelines discourage the excessive use of quotations, even when correctly attributed. Thank you. Peter Karlsen (talk) 02:27, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

Convicted politicians listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Convicted politicians. Since you had some involvement with the Convicted politicians redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Hasteur (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2010 (UTC)

November 2010

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you must sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. - Burpelson AFB 17:59, 22 November 2010 (UTC)