| Revision as of 16:35, 24 January 2011 editTryptofish (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers69,621 edits →Jonestown image: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:32, 24 January 2011 edit undoResidentAnthropologist (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers7,071 edits Warning: Potentially violating the three revert rule on Criticism of religion. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
| Please see ]. In my opinion, your recent edits attempting to remove the image have become disruptive. --] (]) 16:35, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | Please see ]. In my opinion, your recent edits attempting to remove the image have become disruptive. --] (]) 16:35, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == January 2011 == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ]  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Users who ] or refuse to ] with others may be blocked if they continue.<br> | |||
| In particular the ] states that: | |||
| # '''Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block'''. | |||
| # '''Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident'''. | |||
| # '''Do not edit war even if you believe you are right'''. | |||
| If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's ] to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents ] among editors. You can post a request for help at an ] or seek ]. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary ]. If edit warring continues, '''you may be ] from editing without further notice.''' <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 17:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:32, 24 January 2011
This talk page is not a battle ground
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 2 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Courtesy note
As I mentioned an edit of yours today here, I thought as a courtesy I should mention it to you. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 23:42, 22 June 2010 (UTC)
File:Body of Peter Fechter lying next to Berlin Wall.jpg
You seriously need to check "what links here" before you nom images for deletion. This had simply been renamed-the image was still on three articles. Go back and check the links for your deletion noms.--Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 10:25, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
Helpful
Your edits at File:E-tripartite-pact.jpg were helpful to me -- not that I understand yet, but because it helped to better focus the issues. I have an odd request. Can you compose a question which would have elicited these edits as a response? In other words, how could I draft a question in the future which asks for the kind of clarification your edit provides? --Tenmei (talk) 18:32, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- Please re-state what you mean here in different words:
- The Imperial War Museum identifies this as an "official photograph" which I construe as equivalent to "historic image." If there is a distinction, please help clarify by explaining in different words. --Tenmei (talk) 23:33, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- An "historic image" is an image that is famous by itself. It won some prizes or have books and articles written about it etc.. Examples are the photo famous called "Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima" or Diane Arbu's "Child with Toy Hand Grenade in Central Park".
- A photo doesn't necessarily become an historic image just because it portraits an historic event. In a more general phrasing, A photo doesn't necessarily become famous just because it portraits a famous event.
- I hope this helps. --Damiens.rf 16:09, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 20:30, 10 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:30, 10 January 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 04:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:01, 11 January 2011 (UTC)
AfD for Mohamed Bouazizi
Hi Damiens -- I've proposed to close the AfD discussion at Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Mohamed_Bouazizi that you started -- I'd appreciate if you'd consider retracting the proposal in light of the strong consensus against it so the notice can be removed from the article as soon as possible. Joriki (talk) 12:37, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Jonestown image
Please see Talk:Criticism of religion#Jonestown image. In my opinion, your recent edits attempting to remove the image have become disruptive. --Tryptofish (talk) 16:35, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
January 2011
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Criticism of religion. Users who edit disruptively or refuse to collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue.
In particular the three-revert rule states that:
- Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
- Editors violating the rule will usually be blocked for 24 hours for a first incident.
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording, and content that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. The Resident Anthropologist (talk) 17:32, 24 January 2011 (UTC)