Misplaced Pages

Priscilla K. Coleman: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 16:37, 3 February 2011 editRoscelese (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers35,788 edits no, "Russo alleged" is not more neutral, "LifeNews" & "Culture of Life" are not reliable scientific sources, and "document" lends the support of Misplaced Pages's voice to a study on which experts disagree← Previous edit Revision as of 17:26, 3 February 2011 edit undoHaymaker (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,183 edits Undid revision 411804065 by Roscelese (talk)Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Priscilla K. Coleman''' is a Professor of Human Development and Family Studies at ] in Ohio.<ref></ref> '''Priscilla K. Coleman''' is a Professor of Human Development and Family Studies at ] in Ohio.<ref></ref>


Coleman has published articles in peer-reviewed journals that assert a ] between ], and has claimed in interviews that there is a ].<ref name="pas">{{Cite news |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/21/magazine/21abortion.t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all |title=Is there a Post-Abortion Syndrome? |last=Bazelon |first=Emily |date=January 21, 2007 |publisher=The New York Times}}</ref><ref name="now"/> Her methodology has been deemed faulty, and her results rejected, by the ]. Coleman has published articles in peer-reviewed journals that document there is a ] between ], and has claimed in interviews that there is a ].<ref name="pas">{{Cite news |url=http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/21/magazine/21abortion.t.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all |title=Is there a Post-Abortion Syndrome? |last=Bazelon |first=Emily |date=January 21, 2007 |publisher=The New York Times}}</ref><ref name="now"/> One of her co-authors is ].


==Biography== ==Biography==
Coleman has a masters degree from ] and a Ph.D. from ].<ref></ref> Coleman has a masters degree from ] and a Ph.D. from ].<ref></ref>
Coleman has in addition to peer-reviewed, long term studies on the mental health effects of abortion also published opinion pieces in such works as the '']''.<ref></ref> Coleman has in adition to many peer-reviewed, long term studies on the mental health effects of abortion also pubished opinion pieces in such works as the '']''.<ref></ref>


==Criticsm==
One of her co-authors is ].<ref name="pas"/><ref name="now"/>
The statistical methods Coleman and her co-authors use have been criticized by the ] (APA)<ref name="now"> PBS <br />HINOJOSA: In emails, two prominent independent scientists, on a panel that is reviewing the scientific literature for the American Psychological Association told us the studies have "inadequate or inappropriate" controls and don't adequately control "for women's mental health prior to the pregnancy and abortion."</ref> A panel convened by the APA has written that the studies by Coleman, and her co-authors have "inadequate or inappropriate" controls and don't adequately control "for women's mental health prior to the pregnancy and abortion." <ref name="now"/> Coleman for her part has pointed out the methological insuffciancies and political biases in the actions of the APA Task Force on Abortion and Mental Health.<ref></ref>


Coleman, Cougle, Reardon and Rue have also been criticized by other researchers in the field. Jillian Henderson, a professor of gynecology, and Katharine Miller wrote to the ''Journal of Anxiety Disorders'' claiming, "We believe that Cougle, et al., operate with strong political views regarding abortion, and unfortunately their biases appear to have resulted in serious methodological flaws in the analysis published in your journal. <nowiki></nowiki> are involved in building a literature to be used in efforts to restrict access to abortion." <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v20n2/chamberlain_politicized_science.html |title=How Anti-Abortion Myths Feed the Christian Right Agenda |author=Pam Chamberlain |date=summer 2006 |work=Public Eye Magazine |publisher=] |accessdate=3 January 2011}}</ref> Nancy Russo, a psychology professor and abortion researcher, examined two of Coleman and Reardon's articles, and alleged that when the methodological flaws in the studies were corrected, the supposed correlation between abortion and poor mental health disappeared.<ref name="pas"/> This whole argument ignores the fact that much of Coleman's work focuses on the groups that are liekly to suffer post-abortion mental health issues, and that trigger factors are a complexed issue, but if we want to have adequate mental health care we need to recognize that abortion is traumatic.<ref></ref>
==Criticism==
The statistical methods Coleman and her co-authors use have been criticized by the ] (APA)<ref name="now"> PBS <br />HINOJOSA: In emails, two prominent independent scientists, on a panel that is reviewing the scientific literature for the American Psychological Association told us the studies have "inadequate or inappropriate" controls and don't adequately control "for women's mental health prior to the pregnancy and abortion."</ref> A panel convened by the APA has written that the studies by Coleman, and her co-authors have "inadequate or inappropriate" controls and don't adequately control "for women's mental health prior to the pregnancy and abortion." <ref name="now"/>

Coleman, Cougle, Reardon and Rue have also been criticized by other researchers in the field. Jillian Henderson, a professor of gynecology, and Katharine Miller wrote to the ''Journal of Anxiety Disorders'' claiming, "We believe that Cougle, et al., operate with strong political views regarding abortion, and unfortunately their biases appear to have resulted in serious methodological flaws in the analysis published in your journal. <nowiki></nowiki> are involved in building a literature to be used in efforts to restrict access to abortion." <ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.publiceye.org/magazine/v20n2/chamberlain_politicized_science.html |title=How Anti-Abortion Myths Feed the Christian Right Agenda |author=Pam Chamberlain |date=summer 2006 |work=Public Eye Magazine |publisher=] |accessdate=3 January 2011}}</ref> Nancy Russo, a psychology professor and abortion researcher, examined two of Coleman and Reardon's articles, and found that when the methodological flaws in the studies were corrected, the supposed correlation between abortion and poor mental health disappeared.<ref name="pas"/>


A 2010 review of the group's analysis of the ], an analysis which claimed that women who had abortions suffered from higher rates of depression and substance abuse, alleged that Coleman and her colleagues had failed to control for pre-existing mental health problems and for other risk factors for mental health problems, such as sexual or physical violence. Julia Steinberg, one of the researchers, said, "We were unable to reproduce the most basic tabulations of Coleman and colleagues...Moreover, their findings were logically inconsistent with other published research -- for example, they found higher rates of depression in the last month than other studies found during respondents' entire lifetimes. This suggests that the results were substantially inflated." Coleman responded that her analysis had used different methods and examined long-term psychological problems.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/checkup/2010/12/study_disputes_abortion_mental.html |title=Study disputes link between abortion and mental health problems |last=Stein |first=Rob |publisher=Washington Post |date=December 13, 2010}}</ref> A 2010 review of the group's analysis of the ], an analysis which claimed that women who had abortions suffered from higher rates of depression and substance abuse, alleged that Coleman and her colleagues had failed to control for pre-existing mental health problems and for other risk factors for mental health problems, such as sexual or physical violence. Julia Steinberg, one of the researchers, said, "We were unable to reproduce the most basic tabulations of Coleman and colleagues...Moreover, their findings were logically inconsistent with other published research -- for example, they found higher rates of depression in the last month than other studies found during respondents' entire lifetimes. This suggests that the results were substantially inflated." Coleman responded that her analysis had used different methods and examined long-term psychological problems.<ref>{{Cite news |url=http://voices.washingtonpost.com/checkup/2010/12/study_disputes_abortion_mental.html |title=Study disputes link between abortion and mental health problems |last=Stein |first=Rob |publisher=Washington Post |date=December 13, 2010}}</ref>

Revision as of 17:26, 3 February 2011

Priscilla K. Coleman is a Professor of Human Development and Family Studies at Bowling Green State University in Ohio.

Coleman has published articles in peer-reviewed journals that document there is a correlation between abortion and poor mental health, and has claimed in interviews that there is a causal relationship. One of her co-authors is David Reardon.

Biography

Coleman has a masters degree from James Madison University and a Ph.D. from West Virginia University.

Coleman has in adition to many peer-reviewed, long term studies on the mental health effects of abortion also pubished opinion pieces in such works as the National Review.

Criticsm

The statistical methods Coleman and her co-authors use have been criticized by the American Psychological Association (APA) A panel convened by the APA has written that the studies by Coleman, and her co-authors have "inadequate or inappropriate" controls and don't adequately control "for women's mental health prior to the pregnancy and abortion." Coleman for her part has pointed out the methological insuffciancies and political biases in the actions of the APA Task Force on Abortion and Mental Health.

Coleman, Cougle, Reardon and Rue have also been criticized by other researchers in the field. Jillian Henderson, a professor of gynecology, and Katharine Miller wrote to the Journal of Anxiety Disorders claiming, "We believe that Cougle, et al., operate with strong political views regarding abortion, and unfortunately their biases appear to have resulted in serious methodological flaws in the analysis published in your journal. are involved in building a literature to be used in efforts to restrict access to abortion." Nancy Russo, a psychology professor and abortion researcher, examined two of Coleman and Reardon's articles, and alleged that when the methodological flaws in the studies were corrected, the supposed correlation between abortion and poor mental health disappeared. This whole argument ignores the fact that much of Coleman's work focuses on the groups that are liekly to suffer post-abortion mental health issues, and that trigger factors are a complexed issue, but if we want to have adequate mental health care we need to recognize that abortion is traumatic.

A 2010 review of the group's analysis of the National Comorbidity Survey, an analysis which claimed that women who had abortions suffered from higher rates of depression and substance abuse, alleged that Coleman and her colleagues had failed to control for pre-existing mental health problems and for other risk factors for mental health problems, such as sexual or physical violence. Julia Steinberg, one of the researchers, said, "We were unable to reproduce the most basic tabulations of Coleman and colleagues...Moreover, their findings were logically inconsistent with other published research -- for example, they found higher rates of depression in the last month than other studies found during respondents' entire lifetimes. This suggests that the results were substantially inflated." Coleman responded that her analysis had used different methods and examined long-term psychological problems.

References

  1. BGSU :: College of Education and Human Development :: Priscilla Coleman, Ph.D
  2. ^ Bazelon, Emily (January 21, 2007). "Is there a Post-Abortion Syndrome?". The New York Times.
  3. ^ NOW with David Brancaccio PBS
    HINOJOSA: In emails, two prominent independent scientists, on a panel that is reviewing the scientific literature for the American Psychological Association told us the studies have "inadequate or inappropriate" controls and don't adequately control "for women's mental health prior to the pregnancy and abortion."
  4. Bowling Green State University bio of Coleman
  5. National Review article by Coleman
  6. Life News, Aug. 14, 2008 article by Coleman
  7. Pam Chamberlain (summer 2006). "How Anti-Abortion Myths Feed the Christian Right Agenda". Public Eye Magazine. Political Research Associates. Retrieved 3 January 2011. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. interview with Coleman where she speaks of the specific risk factors in abortion mental health issues
  9. Stein, Rob (December 13, 2010). "Study disputes link between abortion and mental health problems". Washington Post.

See also

Template:Persondata

Categories:
Priscilla K. Coleman: Difference between revisions Add topic