Revision as of 00:09, 4 March 2011 editJoy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators144,322 edits ←Created page with '==March 2011== Please, don't remove red links indiscriminately. There are cases where excess links can be removed, but most toponyms...' | Revision as of 11:34, 19 March 2011 edit undoJoy (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators144,322 edits {{blocked}}Next edit → | ||
(5 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{sockpuppet|Ali Muratovic}} | |||
==March 2011== | ==March 2011== | ||
Please, ]. There are ], but most toponyms are not in that category. --] (]) 00:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC) | Please, ]. There are ], but most toponyms are not in that category. --] (]) 00:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC) | ||
], I don't want to play a prosecutor with you and report you for blocking each time. Your cleanup job is basically OK, but '''please''' stop removing those red links. They exist for a reason, see ]. Yes, some of those were created too enthusiastically, and we're unlikely to ever have those articles, but if you can not judge, just let them be instead of removing. As it is now, you're creating more damage than good, because your edits must be sifted, and you're wasting other people's time. | |||
Technically, as a blocked user, you should not be able to edit at all, and administrators are entitled to block you on sight. If you would just play by the rules, nobody will really care. Please. ] (]) 07:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at ]. Your edits appear to constitute ] and have been ] or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> ] (]) 10:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
As you wish. I rolled back all your edits regardless of merits; you're about to be blocked. ] (]) 11:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' temporarily from editing for ]. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you would like to be unblocked, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx" argument. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}, but you should read the ] first. ] (]) 11:25, 10 March 2011 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> | |||
] Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The <span class="plainlinks"></span> you made to ] has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the ] for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative ]. You may also wish to read the ]. Thank you. <!-- Template:Huggle/warn-1 --> ] (]) 04:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC) | |||
<div style="clear: both"></div>]'''You have been {{#if:||temporarily}} ] from editing Misplaced Pages {{#if:|for a period of }} as a result of your {{#if:|disruptive edits to ]|disruptive edits}}.''' You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that ] (including page blanking or addition of ]), ], deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, ]; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning ] and ] will not be tolerated.<!-- Template:Test5 --> --] (]) 11:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 11:34, 19 March 2011
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Ali Muratovic (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
Please use this link to create the category page
(The page will be pre-loaded. All you need to do is save it)
March 2011
Please, don't remove red links indiscriminately. There are cases where excess links can be removed, but most toponyms are not in that category. --Joy (talk) 00:09, 4 March 2011 (UTC)
Ali, I don't want to play a prosecutor with you and report you for blocking each time. Your cleanup job is basically OK, but please stop removing those red links. They exist for a reason, see WP:REDLINK. Yes, some of those were created too enthusiastically, and we're unlikely to ever have those articles, but if you can not judge, just let them be instead of removing. As it is now, you're creating more damage than good, because your edits must be sifted, and you're wasting other people's time.
Technically, as a blocked user, you should not be able to edit at all, and administrators are entitled to block you on sight. If you would just play by the rules, nobody will really care. Please. No such user (talk) 07:37, 7 March 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Rooster. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. XLerate (talk) 10:56, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
As you wish. I rolled back all your edits regardless of merits; you're about to be blocked. No such user (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 11:25, 10 March 2011 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. The recent edit you made to Samad Rizvi has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ZamorakO o (talk) 04:08, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
You have been temporarily blocked from editing Misplaced Pages as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. --Joy (talk) 11:34, 19 March 2011 (UTC)
Category: