| Revision as of 11:42, 8 March 2006 editSarah (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, IP block exemptions18,075 edits →Ambi: adit← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:21, 8 March 2006 edit undoVanished user 5zariu3jisj0j4irj (talk | contribs)36,325 edits →AmbiNext edit → | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
| ::(after ec) I hope you realise that blog is most likely written by the Stephen Beng Ho vandal who wrote defamatory content about Rizzuto and accused Ambi, Longhair and myself of being the same person. As if Ambi would annouce it on a public blog if she was Rizzuto. That blog is just ''another'' fake Rizutto site. ] (]) 07:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | ::(after ec) I hope you realise that blog is most likely written by the Stephen Beng Ho vandal who wrote defamatory content about Rizzuto and accused Ambi, Longhair and myself of being the same person. As if Ambi would annouce it on a public blog if she was Rizzuto. That blog is just ''another'' fake Rizutto site. ] (]) 07:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :::Actually, I correct myself. It isn't ''another'' fake site. It's the same one. This is the Australian politics vandal ]. You'll notice that Longhair cites a blog which StephenBengHo kept inserting into the now deleted Rizzuto article. Funnily enough it's the exact same site that you're now citing as proof that Ambi is Rizzuto. ] (]) 11:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | :::Actually, I correct myself. It isn't ''another'' fake site. It's the same one. This is the Australian politics vandal ]. You'll notice that Longhair cites a blog which StephenBengHo kept inserting into the now deleted Rizzuto article. Funnily enough it's the exact same site that you're now citing as proof that Ambi is Rizzuto. ] (]) 11:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | ||
| Firstly, even if I was Paula Rizzuto, that blog is utterly defamatory, and your linking to it would be unwise. And secondly, I am not Paula Rizzuto, as I just proved to Adam Carr by posting logged out from my Canberra IP address. Thirdly, edit my user page again in that manner and I will block you. ] 23:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:21, 8 March 2006
Category:Controversies
I've posted some questions about the category at ]. Your input would be appreciated. -Will Beback 18:47, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
BitTorrent
{{helpme}} is just for use on your own talk page (here), not on various Misplaced Pages talk pages. If you want a good answer to your factual question I recommend the Reference desk - you are sure to get an answer there.--Commander Keane 07:50, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
Dictionary words
Zondor, got a second to elaborate on what you are trying to accomplish with articles such as Before and Afterwards? We are obviously not a dictionary, and I can't think of why somone would research the encylopedia for a word like Before. xaosflux /CVU 07:05, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Thank's for the reply, I was about to Speedy Delete these, but you're obviously not a clueless newbie :) Although I still don't see much use for these, if you do then someone else may as well, could you go easy on creating more of these for a day or so to make sure there's not a slew of afd/csd noms or issues brought up from your VP link? Thanks, xaosflux /CVU 07:18, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
Moving items to Wiktionary
Can you please review what you recently moved to Wiktionary? By moving them, do you mean that you believe each of them passes wikt:Wiktionary:Criteria_for_inclusion? Otherwise you might just be dumping garbage to another wiki. --Perfecto Canada 09:50, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- Then please stop. If any of them are inappropriate, then an admin there, not just an ordinary user, has to come delete the entry you made. I mean, you're spreading the bad. --Perfecto Canada 09:58, 18 February 2006 (UTC)
- P.S. See its Deletion log.
WP:AFL
Was wondering if you'd be interested in having a look at WikiProject AFL. You an Aussie rules fan? If so I'd strongly suggest you accept the invitation. Cheers, Rogerthat 12:00, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- -- Zondor 13:21, 2 March 2006 (UTC)
- Point taken. :D Just that your username sounded familiar - I know an aussie rules fan who uses that nickname, just thought it might be you. Rogerthat 08:06, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
Ambi
I note there have been some suggestions re Ambi's real life persona. I would suggest that pursuing it against Ambi's wishes is harrassment. Garglebutt / (talk) 07:25, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
I second Garglebutt's comment. Please leave her alone. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 07:48, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Garglebutt has plenty of things to think about in terms of harrassment. But I think putting up that blog link is probably not good. --2006BC 07:56, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- (after ec) I hope you realise that blog is most likely written by the Stephen Beng Ho vandal who wrote defamatory content about Rizzuto and accused Ambi, Longhair and myself of being the same person. As if Ambi would annouce it on a public blog if she was Rizzuto. That blog is just another fake Rizutto site. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 07:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- Actually, I correct myself. It isn't another fake site. It's the same one. This is the Australian politics vandal User talk:StephenBengHo. You'll notice that Longhair cites a blog which StephenBengHo kept inserting into the now deleted Rizzuto article. Funnily enough it's the exact same site that you're now citing as proof that Ambi is Rizzuto. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 11:42, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
- (after ec) I hope you realise that blog is most likely written by the Stephen Beng Ho vandal who wrote defamatory content about Rizzuto and accused Ambi, Longhair and myself of being the same person. As if Ambi would annouce it on a public blog if she was Rizzuto. That blog is just another fake Rizutto site. Sarah Ewart (Talk) 07:58, 8 March 2006 (UTC)
Firstly, even if I was Paula Rizzuto, that blog is utterly defamatory, and your linking to it would be unwise. And secondly, I am not Paula Rizzuto, as I just proved to Adam Carr by posting logged out from my Canberra IP address. Thirdly, edit my user page again in that manner and I will block you. Ambi 23:21, 8 March 2006 (UTC)