| Revision as of 12:13, 27 June 2011 editCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits →Federica Pellegrini: r← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:15, 27 June 2011 edit undoCourcelles (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Administrators434,776 edits →Prunesqualer topic ban clarification: rNext edit → | ||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
| Hello, Courcelles. May I ask you to clarify and/or adjust the scope of Prunesqualer's ? ] says "the entire area of conflict", which usually includes the arbitration enforcement board, but on ] says "every article reasonably related to Israeli-Palestianian conflict". In particular, does on ] violate the ban? --] (]) 22:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC) | Hello, Courcelles. May I ask you to clarify and/or adjust the scope of Prunesqualer's ? ] says "the entire area of conflict", which usually includes the arbitration enforcement board, but on ] says "every article reasonably related to Israeli-Palestianian conflict". In particular, does on ] violate the ban? --] (]) 22:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :No, it does not. The topic ban was meant to apply to article space, without much tolerance for arguments over whether a particular article is related or not. I'll clarify the logs. ] 12:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
Revision as of 12:15, 27 June 2011
| I'll be here very little until Monday. Please don't leave requests here that have any kind of time component to them right now. Courcelles 09:29, 16 June 2011 (UTC) |
 Archives |
|
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Delete new uploads
Hi you can delete the 4 pics I uploaded, there where to be used to full explain all "ITV night time" branding in http://en.wikipedia.org/Night_Network Someone complained there were to many. HOW you suppose to fully explain all services is beyond me!
- FYI, they appear to be back in use now, so the F5 deletion tags have been removed. Courcelles 08:00, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
St. Bridget Catholic Church
Thanks for stopping the speedy deletion. I was using Google Earth street view today and I see something that looks like a historical marker right in front of the church! (I hope it's not just about Casey Jones). --Kenatipo 04:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Heh. Something about this feels notable, even though I couldn't find the sources online. I hope someone is close enough they can find some offline ones before the article ends up at AFD. Courcelles 11:10, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Looks like he's back.
The mass tennis deletionist: see . XXX antiuser 09:38, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- It's come to my attention this may be actually be a banned user (indicated via a relevant rangeblock I found). Given the level he's jumping around, I'm going to apply some semi-protections to see if we can stop this. Courcelles 09:46, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Thanks, I'm unaware of that case I guess. I just want to point out that I never reverted any of their edits as vandalism - but I saw unexplained blanking with sometimes disruptive edit summaries and reverted as such. XXX antiuser 09:56, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi
Hi, could you please check out user ENCRYPTMATRON IP in a possible connection with some blocked vandal. The user shows that he is quite aware of how Misplaced Pages works so im quite confident that the user has had a previous account/s. The user is very aggressive has reported him/her so check it out. Can be completely wrong but I feel im right on this one as Anton Abele has been the subject of vandalism/heavy editing before. Thanks!--BabbaQ (talk) 09:52, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- Seems like you've worked out a resolution, and I see no way that a CU would be other than fishing without some evidence. Regards. Courcelles 02:55, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Talkback
Message added 10:37, 24 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
MarB4 •ɯɒɹ• 10:37, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
KnowIG info
My account is blocked yes. But it is also locked. I do everything that I am ment to do in an unblock request and user kuru declines. I have appealed on meta no joy there. So therefore I need another account. And I cannot do anything with it due to zelous admins. Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.147.16.142 (talk) 10:47, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
- You'll never get to keep a new account active unless you get unblocked locally, at the very least. Even if the global block was gone, the local indef would still apply, and you would still be sockpuppeting to abuse the encyclopaedia. Per your admission, this IP is blocked two weeks. The only way you'll ever be unblocked starts with you stopping the sockpuppeting. Courcelles 11:09, 24 June 2011 (UTC)
Horacio Gutiérrez
When you get a moment, would you mind taking a look at Horacio Gutiérrez? An editor who we had some trouble with there earlier this month appears to have come back to continue some of the same behavior. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 14:37, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
File:Spider-Man Film-1.jpg
Hey you mind deleting the previous upload history of this file. There is too many of them I wish for them to be deleted quickly. Thank you. :) Jhenderson 18:33, 25 June 2011 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of Miss USA, Miss Teen USA and Miss America titleholders who have appeared on reality television
The nominator of this article was a sockpuppet of banned Otto4711. As such, there remained only one (lone and unopposed) delete !voter. I suggest this be reopened and relisted--what do you think? Jclemens (talk) 07:08, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- I can't see this list surviving another week, but there's no real harm in sending it through the spin cycle, either. Courcelles 07:26, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- Yeah, me either, but there's a bit of WP:DENY in my checking out what he's been up to. Maybe he'll eventually give up and go away if we undo everything he "accomplishes". Jclemens (talk) 07:39, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation
- Okay, why are you telling me this? At any rate, I think you're completely wrong, and that this is a small sign of AFC becoming a place where reviewers want near-perfect articles before accepting them, but that's another rant. Courcelles 12:21, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Revdelete request
This edit on Malaysia is grossly offensive with no encyclopedic value. - Yk talk ~ contrib 16:04, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- Gone, and, while I was there, page protected for a while. Courcelles 16:06, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Thanks! - Yk talk ~ contrib 16:07, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
Prunesqualer topic ban clarification
Hello, Courcelles. May I ask you to clarify and/or adjust the scope of Prunesqualer's topic ban? WP:ARBPIA#Discretionary_sanctions says "the entire area of conflict", which usually includes the arbitration enforcement board, but your notice on his talk page says "every article reasonably related to Israeli-Palestianian conflict". In particular, does this comment on the arbitration enforcement request under ARBPIA sanctions violate the ban? --ElComandanteChe (talk) 22:35, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
- No, it does not. The topic ban was meant to apply to article space, without much tolerance for arguments over whether a particular article is related or not. I'll clarify the logs. Courcelles 12:15, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Federica Pellegrini
Hi, I agree with removing the unsourced information, but I just wanted to mention I didn't put it there, I re-ordered information already present in the article (though admittedly my edit summary was confusing). Gap9551 (talk) 10:53, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- I knew it wasn't you :) It was actually put in by an IP a while ago, with this edit. Courcelles 12:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)