| Revision as of 14:29, 9 December 2011 editAsad112 (talk | contribs)Rollbackers1,232 edits →Stop being disruptive← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:24, 9 December 2011 edit undoNableezy (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers56,193 edits →AE: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
| ::::::*Some* people in that discussion probably got paid for involving in it so that's already something positive. That discussion will probably achieve something in the next few days if *somebody* will stop objecting to every map that I or another user suggested. That *certain* editor continuously edits in a way that disrupts many articles, therefore I must refer to him as an editor and not to most of his edits (it'll take me forever to link to over a thousand edits...). I stayed in the top three parts of the pyramid at least in ]-- ] 12:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | ::::::*Some* people in that discussion probably got paid for involving in it so that's already something positive. That discussion will probably achieve something in the next few days if *somebody* will stop objecting to every map that I or another user suggested. That *certain* editor continuously edits in a way that disrupts many articles, therefore I must refer to him as an editor and not to most of his edits (it'll take me forever to link to over a thousand edits...). I stayed in the top three parts of the pyramid at least in ]-- ] 12:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::::::::{{Warnsign}}. If you make a comment like you just did above (inferring some people are getting paid for the Jerusalem discussion), I will take you to ], and I can say with a fair degree of certainty you will have some sort of block/ban imposed upon you for a very lengthy period of time. You have been warned way too much, so you no longer have any excuses. Also, in lew of the very real possibility you may be taken to A/E, I would consider removing . -] (]) 14:29, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | ::::::::{{Warnsign}}. If you make a comment like you just did above (inferring some people are getting paid for the Jerusalem discussion), I will take you to ], and I can say with a fair degree of certainty you will have some sort of block/ban imposed upon you for a very lengthy period of time. You have been warned way too much, so you no longer have any excuses. Also, in lew of the very real possibility you may be taken to A/E, I would consider removing . -] (]) 14:29, 9 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == AE == | |||
| You have been reported to AE. You can see this ]. <small style="border: 1px solid;padding:1px 3px;white-space:nowrap">''']''' - 15:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)</small> | |||
Revision as of 15:24, 9 December 2011
Annoying people, trolls or terrorists and terrorist supporters such as _____ are not welcome, so don't even bother to post here you bunch of Hamas sponsored *******
barnstar for completion of second part of course
|
Mentoring Course Barnstar | ||||||||||
| For completing the Wikiquette part of the course. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC) |
- Actually I should've awarded you this one weeks ago! --Demiurge1000 (talk) 14:08, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
third part of course completed
|
Mentoring Course Barnstar | ||||||||||
| Congratulations on completing the Copyright part of the course. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:22, 11 November 2011 (UTC) |
and the fourth :)
|
Mentoring Course Barnstar | ||||||||||
| Congratulations on completing the Dispute resolution part of the course. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 02:22, 11 November 2011 (UTC) |
Stop being disruptive
I removed your comment here. You need to stop being disruptive. Sean.hoyland - talk 10:56, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- ... I'm obviously not paying enough attention to my watchlist.
- What on earth are you doing? --Demiurge1000 (talk) 11:01, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- There's more where that came from , , and this exchange. Clearly he is going to get his topic ban reimposed if he can't stop. Sean.hoyland - talk 11:10, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- This is old. Here I was kindly asking him a question. This one is right, he only makes political editing and WP:POV pushing edits.-- Someone35 11:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- There's at least two instances of you "kindly" asking Nableezy a question, which don't look constructive or relevant to me. And one of them was downright rude.
- This is old. Here I was kindly asking him a question. This one is right, he only makes political editing and WP:POV pushing edits.-- Someone35 11:21, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- There's more where that came from , , and this exchange. Clearly he is going to get his topic ban reimposed if he can't stop. Sean.hoyland - talk 11:10, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you insist on getting involved in these type of discussions (and I really wonder why you think it's worth it, did you see the amount of text the Jerusalem map discussion generated without achieving anything at all?), then you must learn to focus entirely on the content under discussion - not on the person you happen to be disagreeing with. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 11:27, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- Some* people in that discussion probably got paid for involving in it so that's already something positive. That discussion will probably achieve something in the next few days if *somebody* will stop objecting to every map that I or another user suggested. That *certain* editor continuously edits in a way that disrupts many articles, therefore I must refer to him as an editor and not to most of his edits (it'll take me forever to link to over a thousand edits...). I stayed in the top three parts of the pyramid at least in Talk:Jerusalem-- Someone35 12:49, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
Warning. If you make a comment like you just did above (inferring some people are getting paid for the Jerusalem discussion), I will take you to WP:A/E, and I can say with a fair degree of certainty you will have some sort of block/ban imposed upon you for a very lengthy period of time. You have been warned way too much, so you no longer have any excuses. Also, in lew of the very real possibility you may be taken to A/E, I would consider removing this. -asad (talk) 14:29, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- If you insist on getting involved in these type of discussions (and I really wonder why you think it's worth it, did you see the amount of text the Jerusalem map discussion generated without achieving anything at all?), then you must learn to focus entirely on the content under discussion - not on the person you happen to be disagreeing with. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 11:27, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
AE
You have been reported to AE. You can see this here. nableezy - 15:24, 9 December 2011 (UTC)