| Revision as of 08:33, 13 March 2012 view sourceRyulong (talk | contribs)218,132 edits →could you please stop?← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:36, 13 March 2012 view source WikiSkeptic (talk | contribs)857 edits →could you please stop?Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :The articles are not sourced, and do not seem to say anything about the notability of the work itself. I do not see that these pass ], even if the author is notable.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 08:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC) | :The articles are not sourced, and do not seem to say anything about the notability of the work itself. I do not see that these pass ], even if the author is notable.—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 08:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :Also, they do not appear to pass ].—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 08:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC) | :Also, they do not appear to pass ].—<font color="blue">Ryulong</font> (<font color="Gold">竜龙</font>) 08:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hello! There was a WP BEFORE sourcing. Sourcing is NOVEL--- lack of sourcing requires a tag not a deletion review. Christ, I would have more patience but you newbies editors who weren't around when the site was fought over (the inclusionist/deletionist criteria were hammered out) turn contributing to this project a nightmare. -] (]) 08:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:36, 13 March 2012
| Please post new messages at the bottom of my talk page by using either the "new section" tab or this link. |
| Please sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). If you do not sign your comments, I may remove them entirely. |
| Please keep your comments short and to the point. I do not want to read essays on this page. |
| I will revert and ignore any basic template messages used on my talk page. If you want to talk to me, use your own words. |
| I prefer to keep conversations on one page. If I left a message for you on your user talk page, I prefer to respond to you there. |
| My local time: January 2025 17 Friday 4:17 pm EST |
| Archives
|
|---|
|
When I find that the conversations or issues discussed here have either ended or resolved, they will be inserted into my archives at my own discretion.—Ryūlóng
OOO's Great Power
Should I add in the Great Power of the Kamen Rider OOO Ranger Keys confirmed by Hyper Hobby April 2012 and Figure-Oh No. 169, or should I wait until the movie like usual. A new Astro Switch (Drill Switch Super-Three) and three cards (Reflecloud? and etc.) for the Goseigers were also confirmed in the magazine as well, however their names are not mentioned unlike the OOO stuff. ~Switch On 2012~ ( ★ AlienX2009 ★ ) 01:19, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
- Wait for the movie.—Ryulong (竜龙) 01:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
Apologies
Ryulong I think I was, and I know I was, judging from other editor's comments, too over the top with the AfD. I felt that I wasn't exactly getting through to people when I was putting my two cents in - and that may/may not have been the case with you, but I think I could have taken a different approach to this. I should take this as something to learn from. Apologies for my actions, as they would be deemed as childish.
Hope to work with you sometime on the project - on perhaps something we'll both agree on. Regards, -- MST☆R 07:12, 12 March 2012 (UTC)
could you please stop?
These inclusionist/deletionist wars have already been fought over 1000 million times. The authors are not SP or vanity, but heavily literary critiqued authors who sold millions of copies. I wish I could be more patient in this message to you, but the authorial criterion for works have been hammered out in 2005 for chrissakes and we cna't fight these battles over and over and over again. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 08:30, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- The articles are not sourced, and do not seem to say anything about the notability of the work itself. I do not see that these pass WP:GNG, even if the author is notable.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:31, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Also, they do not appear to pass WP:BK.—Ryulong (竜龙) 08:33, 13 March 2012 (UTC)
- Hello! There was a WP BEFORE sourcing. Sourcing is NOVEL--- lack of sourcing requires a tag not a deletion review. Christ, I would have more patience but you newbies editors who weren't around when the site was fought over (the inclusionist/deletionist criteria were hammered out) turn contributing to this project a nightmare. -WikiSkeptic (talk) 08:36, 13 March 2012 (UTC)