Misplaced Pages

User talk:Secret of success: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:54, 5 April 2012 editDwaipayanc (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,440 edits Re: Bangalore: updated← Previous edit Revision as of 00:48, 6 April 2012 edit undoAshermadan (talk | contribs)3,010 edits Replaced content with 'STOP TALKING TO ME AND HARASSING ME OR I WILL REPORT YOU. WHAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? ~~~~'Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
STOP TALKING TO ME AND HARASSING ME OR I WILL REPORT YOU. WHAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? ] (]) 00:48, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
<table cellspacing="4" {{round corners}} cellpadding="2" style="background: #00FF7F" border-style: double>
<tr><td valign="top"><div style="background: #98FB98; {{round corners}} padding: 1em; text-align: justify;"><div class="scrollTable" id="SOS" style="overflow: width: 1000;">
<div style="background-color: #66CDAA; {{round corners}} padding: 0.5em 1em;"> {{User:Secret of success/Menu}}</div>


<div style="font-family: Trebuchet MS; font-size: 95%">

== ] ==

No one responded to GA review? Thats the reson for not keeping the GA tag? This looks odd. How does the communication take place that a certain article is up for its GA review again? Are the regular editors of it notified? Ofcourse it is noted at ]. But i doubt people have this page on their watchlist. Anyways.... i am not complaining. I dont care much about GA/FA of articles, especially Krrish. But as i havent been involved in this before hence asking out of curiosity. -] (]) 08:56, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
:Sorry! Forget it. I now saw that you had posted on ] also. -] (]) 11:00, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
::It was on my watch list but I somehow missed it. Probably because when I see a well known editor like SoS making edits I sometimes ignore them, looking instead for vandalism by unknowns. I would assume that SoS was improving the article, not trying to delist it. I would have helped to improve it if I had known. Well, maybe I can take it back to GA in the future. ] <span style="color:green">||</span> ] 11:37, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
:::It looks like you did the right thing. Forget whatever else I said. Cheers, ] <span style="color:green">||</span> ] 22:58, 24 March 2012 (UTC)

Can you have a look at the article now? I have been working on improving it for GA again. ] <span style="color:green">||</span> ] 18:35, 29 March 2012 (UTC)
:I can probably replace 13 with something else; I know there is more info out there on his injury. I think 30 is okay; its just there to show that the reviews were similar. 37 can probably just go away. I think you had a problem with 35 before; that one may have to go along with the text if it can't be supported somewhere else. So far I can't find anything. I am not quite done yet; did you mean a peer review? ] <span style="color:green">||</span> ] 12:20, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Misplaced Pages talk:WikiProject Film/Indian cinema task force|Volunteer co-ordinators|ts=11:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)}}
I have just recommended you as a Co-Volunteer co-ordinator for ]. Have you words and let us know if you are interested. Thank you :) -- ] ] 11:16, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

:Hey thanks a bunch for the barnstar, was an unexpected one. Hope you are doing great :) -- ] ] 12:52, 23 March 2012 (UTC)

===Rockstar===
Ohh! No problem, I will do it. And ya, thanks alot for your kind gestures. Will make it a GA soon :) -- ] ] 15:32, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
:Should I nominate for GA now? -- ] ] 18:10, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

==Talkback==
{{talkback|Talk:List of accolades received by Bodyguard (2011 Hindi film)}}
--] (]) 13:04, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

== ''The Signpost'': 26 March 2012 ==

<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2012-03-26}}
</div><!--Volume 8, Issue 13-->
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
* ''']'''
* ]
* ]
* ] (]) 00:59, 27 March 2012 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0251 -->

== Replied... ==

... to you on my talk page. -] (]) 14:27, 29 March 2012 (UTC)

== ]: ] ==

Thanks for your comment. I have replied on the FAC. Please let me know if the article has any more issues taking into consideration the ].--] <sup> ] </sup> 06:36, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
: Replied. --] <sup> ] </sup> 17:30, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
==Talkback==
{{talkback|Karthikndr|Rockstar|ts=09:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)}}
-- ] ] 09:52, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

:Hey, you have deleted your userpage? Why? -- ] ] 10:21, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

::Are you, by any chance, retiring? ~*~''']]'''~*~ 12:59, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
:::Fortunately, or should I say unfortunately, I have no plans of retiring. I just wanted to redirect my page to my talk. <font face="Batik Regular">]</font> 14:54, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
::::Saving some space on server? {{Smiley|smile}} §§] (]) 16:44, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
:::::Its assume "good faith", not the "best faith". Anyway, I applaud your thinking and perhaps, it contributes to that too. {{smiley|smile}} <font face="Batik Regular">]</font> 16:47, 2 April 2012 (UTC)

== ''The Signpost'': 02 April 2012 ==

<div style="-moz-column-count:2; -webkit-column-count:2; column-count:2;">
{{Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2012-04-02}}
</div><!--Volume 8, Issue 14-->
<div class="hlist" style="margin-top:10px; font-size:90%; padding-left:5px; font-family:Georgia, Palatino, Palatino Linotype, Times, Times New Roman, serif;">
* ''']'''
* ]
* ]
* ] (]) 07:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
</div>
<!-- EdwardsBot 0253 -->

== Reply ==

Thank you the post on my talk page and the subsequent suggestions you gave. However, I have not made any significant edits to that page, I just happened to visit it and thought it complies with good article guidelines. So I nominated it. However, right now it would not be possible for me to make the edits you suggested for some reasons. I see that you have posted it on the talk page of the article, and hope that some editor would complete the required development.
As of being new user, I am not a new editor, my account is a few years old. However, I have started editing more actively only since few months, and thus I have less experience. Thus, even though I have tried to understand main Wiki policies, I might make mistakes.
] (]) 13:40, 3 April 2012 (UTC)

==Ra.One nominated for ]==

This notice is to inform you that I have nominated the article '']'' for a ] promotion. The nomination can be viewed ]. Any comments are welcome at the article's or my talk page. Thank you. ~*~''']]'''~*~ 13:19, 4 April 2012 (UTC)

== ] ==

With reference to the current National Awards announced, I have created an article ]. As you are an experienced editor on wiki and on India film project, I would appreciate if you can review the article and provide some comments as per your convenience, it would be helpful to improve the article. Thanks. - ]<sup>]</sup> 03:40, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

==Re: Bangalore==
I can not comment on this right now as I have not the history section of the article. I will read the history section, and then comment. If that takes a long time (sometimes understanding unknown history takes a long time!), you can go ahead and make changes, as the lead definitely needs improvement.--] (]) 15:15, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
:Have you saved that proposed addition in some sandbox or somewhere else?--] (]) 15:18, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
::Did some changes in the version saved in your ]. Have a look. Change as necessary. I am not liking the last sentence much.--] (]) 17:54, 5 April 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:48, 6 April 2012

STOP TALKING TO ME AND HARASSING ME OR I WILL REPORT YOU. WHAT DO YOU NOT UNDERSTAND? Ashermadan (talk) 00:48, 6 April 2012 (UTC)

User talk:Secret of success: Difference between revisions Add topic