| Revision as of 17:51, 17 January 2012 edit71.184.188.254 (talk) →A 3RR violation on your part has been reported← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:07, 13 April 2012 edit undoSomedifferentstuff (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users18,472 edits Removed.Next edit → | ||
| (41 intermediate revisions by 21 users not shown) | |||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| :Related to the above message; please respect your other editors and ]. It doesn't have to be long - it can be anything as short as "reply", "note" or "comment" on a talk page - but try to make it descriptive (i.e. "adding source", "changing wording", etc). Thank you, ] 11:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | :Related to the above message; please respect your other editors and ]. It doesn't have to be long - it can be anything as short as "reply", "note" or "comment" on a talk page - but try to make it descriptive (i.e. "adding source", "changing wording", etc). Thank you, ] 11:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == Gold Standard IP == | |||
| == A 3RR violation on your part has been reported == | |||
| I've asked Ed to take a look at the new IP address our friend is using now and to block it for evasion. No reason to do anything until then as they'll just keep pushing their POV. I did chuckle at their first post (Oh, look, I'm unblocked! Right...). <b><font color="darkred">]</font></b> <font color="black">(])</font> 03:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| Your disruptive editing on the gold standard page, deletion of sourced material, repeated inclusion of fringe material, reordering material to place minor/fringe material on top to make them look more popular is unacceptable. Your continuing engagement in edit wars without any attempt to resolve disputes on the talk page is also unacceptable. Your repeated deletion of warnings on the gold standard talk page are also unacceptable. | |||
| == A barnstar for you! == | |||
| As a result of your disruptive behavior you have been reported for a 3RR violation and engaging in edit war] (]) 17:32, 17 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| {| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;" | |||
| :Link to warning http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Edit_warring#Somedifferentstuff_reported_by_71.184.188.254_.28Result:_.29] (]) 17:51, 17 January 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | ] | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | '''The Copyeditor's Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Just to let you know that your excellent work at the OWS articles has not gone unnoticed. ] (]) 09:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| ==Crime/Security Concerns/Security== | |||
| I've brought the discussion back ] again. Since you recently editted OWS, I am extending an invite to you.] (]) 04:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Lead== | |||
| Hello! I noticed you removed from the Motivation section of ]. You cited ] concerns, and I do kinda agree with you on that one. | |||
| However, there's one concern. The statement is currently mentioned in the lead too. And the lead is supposed to be a summary of the article. So if the statement is removed from the article, it should be removed from the lead too. But if it is in the lead, it should be mentioned somewhere in the article too. What do you think?''']''' <sub>]</sub> 14:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I think if it's mentioned in the lead then there needs to be some information mentioned that discusses his psychological assessment as well. ] (]) 14:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ::Let's take this to the article's talk page to have a broader discussion.''']''' <sub>]</sub> 14:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == 2012 Midi-Pyrénées shootings == | |||
| I noticed you recently edited this article. Would you be so kind as to participate in some discussion at ]. Thanks in advance! ''']''' <sub>]</sub> 21:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| :I notice you've been editing this page. While I totally respect your edits, I strongly urge you to use the talk page. I know that AnkhMorpork often doesn't discuss, but still you should discuss. This way you will build consensus for your edits. I promise to engage in any discussion you start even if no other user does (if I don't just nudge me on my talk page). | |||
| :Also try to stay away from needless reverting. Keep your cool. And avoid ]. I give you this advice with the best of intentions :-). Cheers, ''']''' <sub>]</sub> 03:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| == A barnstar for you == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" |{{#ifeq:{{{2}}}|alt|]|]}} | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Modest Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! ] (]) 20:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| :Congratulations, Somedifferentstuff ! ''']''' <sub>]</sub> 03:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC) | |||
| ==Dispute resolution survey== | |||
| {| style="background-color: #CCFFFF; border: 4px solid #3399cc; width:100%" cellpadding="5" | |||
| | ] | |||
| <big>'''Dispute Resolution – ''Survey Invite'''''</big> | |||
| ---- | |||
| Hello {{BASEPAGENAME}}. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Misplaced Pages, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. | |||
| '''Please click to participate.'''<br> | |||
| Many thanks in advance for your comments and thoughts. | |||
| ---- | |||
| <small>You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated ]. <font face="Verdana">] ] <sup>]</sup></font> 23:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC)</small> | |||
| |} | |||
Revision as of 00:07, 13 April 2012
OWS Demographics change
Why did you remove conservatives and the reference as undue weight? I read the article and it mentions a conservative teacher. Could you clarify. I lean towards inclusion of that. The reference is valid, reliable and contains the information. What is the undue weight that you see?--Amadscientist (talk) 12:35, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
- Never mind...it is. A google search shows nothing in the form of actual articles and a mention of a single conservative teacher in one is undue weight at this time.--Amadscientist (talk) 12:42, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
Update
Sorry about taking the union stuff out. That was not my intention, and I think the article is better now that you re-added the two union edits. Happy editing, 완젬스 (talk) 14:03, 11 November 2011 (UTC)
AN/I
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --OpenFuture (talk) 11:09, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- Related to the above message; please respect your other editors and leave an edit summary. It doesn't have to be long - it can be anything as short as "reply", "note" or "comment" on a talk page - but try to make it descriptive (i.e. "adding source", "changing wording", etc). Thank you, m.o.p 11:32, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Gold Standard IP
I've asked Ed to take a look at the new IP address our friend is using now and to block it for evasion. No reason to do anything until then as they'll just keep pushing their POV. I did chuckle at their first post (Oh, look, I'm unblocked! Right...). Ravensfire (talk) 03:41, 24 January 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Copyeditor's Barnstar |
| Just to let you know that your excellent work at the OWS articles has not gone unnoticed. Gandydancer (talk) 09:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC) |
Crime/Security Concerns/Security
I've brought the discussion back here again. Since you recently editted OWS, I am extending an invite to you.Racingstripes (talk) 04:44, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Lead
Hello! I noticed you removed this sentence from the Motivation section of 2012 Midi-Pyrénées shootings. You cited WP:Undue concerns, and I do kinda agree with you on that one.
However, there's one concern. The statement is currently mentioned in the lead too. And the lead is supposed to be a summary of the article. So if the statement is removed from the article, it should be removed from the lead too. But if it is in the lead, it should be mentioned somewhere in the article too. What do you think?VR talk 14:33, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think if it's mentioned in the lead then there needs to be some information mentioned that discusses his psychological assessment as well. Somedifferentstuff (talk) 14:38, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
- Let's take this to the article's talk page to have a broader discussion.VR talk 14:39, 1 April 2012 (UTC)
2012 Midi-Pyrénées shootings
I noticed you recently edited this article. Would you be so kind as to participate in some discussion at Talk:2012_Midi-Pyrénées_shootings#Third_party_comment. Thanks in advance! VR talk 21:42, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
- I notice you've been editing this page. While I totally respect your edits, I strongly urge you to use the talk page. I know that AnkhMorpork often doesn't discuss, but still you should discuss. This way you will build consensus for your edits. I promise to engage in any discussion you start even if no other user does (if I don't just nudge me on my talk page).
- Also try to stay away from needless reverting. Keep your cool. And avoid WP:3rr. I give you this advice with the best of intentions :-). Cheers, VR talk 03:01, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
|
The Modest Barnstar | |
| In recognition of all the work you’ve done lately! 66.87.7.36 (talk) 20:25, 4 April 2012 (UTC) |
- Congratulations, Somedifferentstuff ! VR talk 03:02, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Dispute resolution survey
 Dispute Resolution – Survey Invite Hello Somedifferentstuff. I am currently conducting a study on the dispute resolution processes on the English Misplaced Pages, in the hope that the results will help improve these processes in the future. Whether you have used dispute resolution a little or a lot, now we need to know about your experience. The survey takes around five minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist in analyzing the results of the survey. No personally identifiable information will be released. Please click HERE to participate. You are receiving this invitation because you have had some activity in dispute resolution over the past year. For more information, please see the associated research page. Steven Zhang 23:55, 5 April 2012 (UTC) |