| Revision as of 00:00, 21 May 2012 editLivingBot (talk | contribs)Bots, Mass message senders88,560 edits →Friendly notification regarding this week's Signpost: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:11, 21 May 2012 edit undoArmbrust (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers326,539 edits →Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Fæ: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| Hello. This is an automated message to tell you that, as it stands, you are set to be mentioned in this week's Arbitration Report (]). The report aims to inform readers of ''The Signpost'' about the proceedings of the Arbitration Committee in a non-partisan manner. Please review the draft article, and, if you have any concerns, feel free to leave them on the talkpage (transcluded in the Comments section directly below the main body of text), where they will be read by a member of the editorial team. Please only edit the article yourself in the case of ''grievous'' factual errors (making sure to note such changes in the comments section). Thank you. On behalf of ''The Signpost''{{'}}s editorial team, ] (]) 00:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | Hello. This is an automated message to tell you that, as it stands, you are set to be mentioned in this week's Arbitration Report (]). The report aims to inform readers of ''The Signpost'' about the proceedings of the Arbitration Committee in a non-partisan manner. Please review the draft article, and, if you have any concerns, feel free to leave them on the talkpage (transcluded in the Comments section directly below the main body of text), where they will be read by a member of the editorial team. Please only edit the article yourself in the case of ''grievous'' factual errors (making sure to note such changes in the comments section). Thank you. On behalf of ''The Signpost''{{'}}s editorial team, ] (]) 00:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| You have closed ] due to inactivity, but it was requested at ], that the closure should be summarized. Could you do this? ] <sup><font color="#E3A857">]</font></sup><sub> <font color="#008000">]</font></sub> 10:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 10:11, 21 May 2012
|
| Archives | ||
|---|---|---|
|
Precious
|
closings |
| Thank you for your approach to be known by the quality of your contributions and for being somebody who closes threads that lead only deeper into WP:Great Dismal Swamp aka Endmoot, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:23, 17 May 2012 (UTC) |
- Thank you Nobody Ent
Well said
This piece was particularly well said. -- Dianna (talk) 14:07, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you Nobody Ent
Just close it....
The other editor has already said his intent was not to get actions, therefore the use of ANI was useless, and the wrong forum. Besides, I've only posted there twice :-) (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 20:28, 17 May 2012 (UTC)
- Since you wanted it to be closed. I will reply here or, if you want, you may reopen it. I disagree with your comment that, "this was sufficient warning as per Misplaced Pages's requirements." - It wasn't!! I agreed with you that we need to stop the WP:BATTLE mentality, I ended my comments saying "thank you". You could have easily refrained from evincing WP:BATTLE mentality by not stretching it further.
But then, what did you do?
You went on to claim patently illogical things. I was not playing a "game" when I said I didn't get warned properly. Your deliberate caricature of my position, predicated upon your high-handed bullishness, is chronically wearing too.
I say this with utmost humility, "grow up!" Brendon ishere 07:42, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
IMO you may close this section
This discussion isn't going in the direction where it would actually help improve wikipedia, but taking up space. Brendon ishere 12:13, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- A close by me probably wouldn't stick. Just stop replying (take ANI off your watchlist, if it's there) and it will wind down pretty quickly. Nobody Ent 12:16, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- Brendon111, I am quite "uninvolved" with your situation, so I don't know how I got lumped into the same category as the opener of the section and the admin whose head you've been screaming for. If you can be helped, that is good; but you must listen without firing from the hip at every perceived insult. If you cannot be helped, it is certainly not our responsibility to fix you (per WP:NOTTHERAPY). We can only attempt to point you in the right direction. So try to roll with the punches a little more gracefully from now on, okay? Doc talk 12:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- I just figured it out. Some out there have just been baiting me all along. I do edit
contentiousextremely sensitive articles and have been involved in multipledisputestiffs in the recent past. It's not hard to imagine that I have more than a few around me who don't want me editing there. (Nonetheless, I reserve the right to change my mind.) Brendon ishere 15:07, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
- I just figured it out. Some out there have just been baiting me all along. I do edit
- Brendon111, I am quite "uninvolved" with your situation, so I don't know how I got lumped into the same category as the opener of the section and the admin whose head you've been screaming for. If you can be helped, that is good; but you must listen without firing from the hip at every perceived insult. If you cannot be helped, it is certainly not our responsibility to fix you (per WP:NOTTHERAPY). We can only attempt to point you in the right direction. So try to roll with the punches a little more gracefully from now on, okay? Doc talk 12:41, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
Friendly notification regarding this week's Signpost
Hello. This is an automated message to tell you that, as it stands, you are set to be mentioned in this week's Arbitration Report (link). The report aims to inform readers of The Signpost about the proceedings of the Arbitration Committee in a non-partisan manner. Please review the draft article, and, if you have any concerns, feel free to leave them on the talkpage (transcluded in the Comments section directly below the main body of text), where they will be read by a member of the editorial team. Please only edit the article yourself in the case of grievous factual errors (making sure to note such changes in the comments section). Thank you. On behalf of The Signpost's editorial team, LivingBot (talk) 00:00, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Fæ
You have closed Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Fæ due to inactivity, but it was requested at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Requests for closure, that the closure should be summarized. Could you do this? Armbrust, B.Ed. The Undertaker 20–0 10:11, 21 May 2012 (UTC)