Revision as of 23:18, 2 June 2012 editBbb23 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators271,283 edits Warning: Violating the three-revert rule on Sun Myung Moon. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:37, 2 June 2012 edit undoBorovv (talk | contribs)634 edits →June 2012Next edit → | ||
Line 90: | Line 90: | ||
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 23:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC) | To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's ] to work toward making a version that represents ] among editors. See ] for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant ] or seek ]. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary ]. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ] (]) 23:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
:I am doing the right thing editing the article of BLP with a sourced content and without hurting the subject of the article within the rules and spirit of WP. The thing is, you rollback my revisions to , and that might be considered as ] because a motivation is not good after all the possible good faiths considered. Please, stop haunting me. I am ready to talk to you when my feeling of a COI will disappear or when mediator will intervene. Yours, ] (]) 23:37, 2 June 2012 (UTC) |
Revision as of 23:37, 2 June 2012
Hi. Steve Dufour (talk) 20:56, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
'Pro-Jewish" bias
Hi, I answered to you on the discussion page for the Unified Church. Saying that jews admit Jesus as "king of Israel" is as invalid as to say that christians "reject Jesus as their saviour". Jews do not believe in the divinity of Jesus and do not believe in his relation to the house of David. When they do so, they became christians, on their faith. Moreso cutting edge as a reliable source not really convincing... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Albertlberman (talk • contribs) 15:47, 31 March 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Sun Myung Moon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to MP, Sikorsky, Economic and Social Council, David Anderson, Power broker, Ministry of Education and Science and Vatican
- Unification Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Hot spot, Economic and Social Council, Church, CARP and Georgia
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Sun Myung Moon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Clarksburg and Harrison County Courthouse
- Unification Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Clarksburg and Harrison County Courthouse
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:32, 14 February 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 18
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Sun Myung Moon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bush administration
- Unification Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Bush administration
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 18 March 2012 (UTC)
Sun Myung Moon
In you reversion of my edits to the Sun Myung Moon article intended to remove bias, you put back in information in a way that was demonstrably incorrect and did not clear up the bias. Shemp Howard, Jr. (talk) 04:13, 21 March 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Moonie wedding
Hello Borovv. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Moonie wedding, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: I agree with RHaworth that this is a reasonable redirect. If you think it should go, take it to WP:RFD. Thank you. JohnCD (talk) 11:40, 28 March 2012 (UTC)
Moon Bio
see talk page of article. EBY (talk) 03:07, 2 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 5
Hi. When you recently edited Unification Church, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Governing body and Supreme (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:25, 5 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 12
Hi. When you recently edited Sun Myung Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese President (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 23
Hi. When you recently edited Sun Myung Moon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Posthumously (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 23 April 2012 (UTC)
Sun Myung Moon bio
Hello. Please do not remove sourced information about his wives and children from this bio. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 14:48, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Your interpretation of the BLP policy is in error, and I have restored the information. There is long precedent for including well-sourced neutral information about prominent people's families. The materials are sourced to reliable news outlets. We can discuss further at Talk:Sun Myung Moon, but we do not leave out well-sourced information that is relevant. Adherents distinguish between True Family and other family, making those other family members worthy of inclusion. Jokestress (talk) 21:46, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hello. The warning template you added to my talk page is not accurate, as neither I nor the Sun Myung Moon article is subject to binding arbitration. If you would like to discuss the edits in order to reach consensus we can do so at Talk:Sun Myung Moon. It is standard practice here to include a list of people's children (see Angelina Jolie#Children), even if some of them died young (see Francis A. Nixon). I take BLP matters seriously and believe all of my edits adhere strictly to policy. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 01:40, 30 2012 (UTC)
- Please join me at Talk:Sun Myung Moon or at the BLP Noticeboard if you would like to discuss content. You are engaging in an edit war which is not based on policy, but rather on your personal feelings about this subject. We are not going to reach consensus if you continue to remove reliable sources. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 03:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please consider this a first warning regarding removal of sourced information. I strongly recommend you stop editing Unification Church-related articles while your multiple objections are being addressed. Your pattern of behavior is starting to get disruptive and is not conducive to reaching consensus. This can lead to your being blocked. I am trying to work with you, but you need to stop removing the names of Moon's wives and children and reliable sources with that information simply because you don't wish to have them included. Please join me at Talk:Sun Myung Moon or at the BLP Noticeboard if you would like to discuss content. Jokestress (talk) 06:27, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please do not threaten me with the possibility of being blocked. You are in the noticeboard for BLP violation, not me, so it's unapropriate of you to recommend me smth: i am flattered, thanks, but i dont need that - it's an administrator's jurisdiction to deside a block, not yours, not mine. Please follow a WP:COMMONSENSE: the last source actually does not say about adultery, it says about misunderstanding because of possible translation hardships and power misuse from court officials, but you put the misleading citation torn out of context. See WP:COI, WP:ATTACK and WP:NEEDSMOARDRAMA. DONT FORGET WP:BLP Borovv (talk) 07:15, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please consider this a first warning regarding removal of sourced information. I strongly recommend you stop editing Unification Church-related articles while your multiple objections are being addressed. Your pattern of behavior is starting to get disruptive and is not conducive to reaching consensus. This can lead to your being blocked. I am trying to work with you, but you need to stop removing the names of Moon's wives and children and reliable sources with that information simply because you don't wish to have them included. Please join me at Talk:Sun Myung Moon or at the BLP Noticeboard if you would like to discuss content. Jokestress (talk) 06:27, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Please join me at Talk:Sun Myung Moon or at the BLP Noticeboard if you would like to discuss content. You are engaging in an edit war which is not based on policy, but rather on your personal feelings about this subject. We are not going to reach consensus if you continue to remove reliable sources. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 03:28, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hello. The warning template you added to my talk page is not accurate, as neither I nor the Sun Myung Moon article is subject to binding arbitration. If you would like to discuss the edits in order to reach consensus we can do so at Talk:Sun Myung Moon. It is standard practice here to include a list of people's children (see Angelina Jolie#Children), even if some of them died young (see Francis A. Nixon). I take BLP matters seriously and believe all of my edits adhere strictly to policy. Thanks. Jokestress (talk) 01:40, 30 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 30
Hi. When you recently edited Unification Church, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Al Aqsa (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:33, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
POV thing on Unification Church
Since we can't reach an agreement, I've notified admins, so they'll decide i guess. No hard feelings. Here: Misplaced Pages:Administrators noticeboard#Unification_Church --78.134.143.236 (talk) 04:43, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
June 2012
Your recent editing history at Sun Myung Moon shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:18, 2 June 2012 (UTC)
- I am doing the right thing editing the article of BLP with a sourced content and without hurting the subject of the article within the rules and spirit of WP. The thing is, you rollback my revisions to the article from my revisions, and that might be considered as WP:COI because a motivation is not good after all the possible good faiths considered. Please, stop haunting me. I am ready to talk to you when my feeling of a COI will disappear or when mediator will intervene. Yours, Borovv (talk) 23:37, 2 June 2012 (UTC)