| Revision as of 01:02, 11 September 2012 editZ554 (talk | contribs)210 edits →1RR← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:04, 11 September 2012 edit undoAlf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers28,976 edits →1RR: please read the policies and stop edit warring, please?Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ''"...none of the fundamental principles of wikipedia include fact, objective or otherwise."'' Q.E.D. ] (]) 01:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | ''"...none of the fundamental principles of wikipedia include fact, objective or otherwise."'' Q.E.D. ] (]) 01:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::Please consider actually reading the principles of wikipedia before continuing your edit warring at ].— ] (]) 01:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:04, 11 September 2012
Ok...now what?
Now what.
Now you could explain your dropping a POV tag on Esh Kodesh without explaining what problems you have with it on the talk page so that we can understand and then discuss why you think the article is not neutral.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:43, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- I included an explanation in the edit summary. Z554 (talk) 22:48, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Not enough. See explanation at Template:POV. In particular, "The editor placing this template in an article should promptly provide a reason on the article's talk page. In the absence of a reason and it is not clear what the neutrality issue is, this tag may be removed by any editor."— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Please do the same at Israeli settlement. Help us help you to be happy.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
- Not enough. See explanation at Template:POV. In particular, "The editor placing this template in an article should promptly provide a reason on the article's talk page. In the absence of a reason and it is not clear what the neutrality issue is, this tag may be removed by any editor."— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 22:51, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
1RR
You should self-revert your reversion of my edit. You're in violation of 1RR at Israeli settlement. If you don't know what that means you should read up on it from the links in the big ARBCOM template at the top of the talk page there. But you should revert yourself first, please?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:31, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- You cannot unilaterally remove a POV designation while it is under discussion. Z554 (talk) 00:34, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't unilaterally remove it. Another editor removed it too. And your discussion is ignoring fundamental principles of wikipedia. Edit warring is bad, though. You should think about stopping it and self-reverting.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:39, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- I would have thought one of the "fundamental principles of wikipedia" included objective fact. The removal was unilateral. There was no "consensus". Z554 (talk) 00:43, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- For better or worse, none of the fundamental principles of wikipedia include fact, objective or otherwise. Read Misplaced Pages:Verifiability. You ought to try learning how things work around here before you jump in with both feet. Maybe you can get a mentor or something?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 00:51, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
"...none of the fundamental principles of wikipedia include fact, objective or otherwise." Q.E.D. Z554 (talk) 01:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)
- Please consider actually reading the principles of wikipedia before continuing your edit warring at Israeli settlement.— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 01:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)