| Revision as of 17:51, 15 October 2012 editTillman (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers29,594 edits →Nomination of Gerhard Kramm for deletion: fix mine← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:59, 16 October 2012 edit undoShock Brigade Harvester Boris (talk | contribs)15,524 edits →Nomination of Gerhard Kramm for deletion: friendly notice regarding Arbitration Committee sanctions related to climate changeNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :Thanks for contributing to the AfD. But you will be more effective if you make a cogent case for retention there (as I assume you prefer), rather than a straight cut-and-paste. As it stands, your contrib is confusing. TIA, ] (]) 17:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC) | :Thanks for contributing to the AfD. But you will be more effective if you make a cogent case for retention there (as I assume you prefer), rather than a straight cut-and-paste. As it stands, your contrib is confusing. TIA, ] (]) 17:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ==Notification of Arbitration Committee sanctions related to climate change== | |||
| Hello Mmarque. This is to make you aware that the ] has permitted ] to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at ]) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to ]. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the ], any expected ], or any ]. | |||
| Please know that my message here is ''not'' meant to allege any misconduct on your part, but only to make you aware of the sanctions so that you can avoid trouble. Be mindful that anyone who engages in inappropriate behavior in this area may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the ] section of the decision page. | |||
| It would be well to familiarise yourself with the information page at ], with the appropriate sections of ], and with the case decision page. ] (]) 01:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:59, 16 October 2012
March 2009
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on James Hansen. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Atmoz (talk) 18:09, 22 March 2009 (UTC)
Images
Hi, I nominated File:Akasofu.jpg, File:Nielsen.jpg, and File:Gerhard kramm.jpg for deletion as copyright violations and File:Nicole Molders.jpg for lacking a source. Regards Hekerui (talk) 22:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)
May 2011
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to July 8, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. -- Mufka 03:06, 4 May 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Gerhard Kramm for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Gerhard Kramm is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Gerhard Kramm until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sailsbystars (talk) 20:26, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks for contributing to the AfD. But you will be more effective if you make a cogent case for retention there (as I assume you prefer), rather than a straight cut-and-paste. As it stands, your contrib is confusing. TIA, Pete Tillman (talk) 17:50, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification of Arbitration Committee sanctions related to climate change
Hello Mmarque. This is to make you aware that the Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Climate change. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behavior, or any normal editorial process.
Please know that my message here is not meant to allege any misconduct on your part, but only to make you aware of the sanctions so that you can avoid trouble. Be mindful that anyone who engages in inappropriate behavior in this area may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read in the Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Climate change#Final decision section of the decision page.
It would be well to familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page. Short Brigade Harvester Boris (talk) 01:59, 16 October 2012 (UTC)