| Revision as of 15:21, 9 December 2012 editIronholds (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers79,705 edits good lord | Revision as of 08:54, 11 December 2012 edit undoQuasihuman (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers4,529 edits re refering this to ArbComNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ==Good lord== | ==Good lord== | ||
| Whoever closes this RfC should note it has Dream Focus, DGG and me agreeing on something to do with deletion. That should be evidence in and of itself ;p. ] (]) 15:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC) | Whoever closes this RfC should note it has Dream Focus, DGG and me agreeing on something to do with deletion. That should be evidence in and of itself ;p. ] (]) 15:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ==ArbCom== | |||
| I'm torn on the suggestion by S Marshall that this case be referred to ArbCom. If SchuminWeb was continuing to edit whilst ignoring this RfC, such an action would have have my full support. As of now, he hasn't made an edit since the 28th of November, and hasn't used his tools since the 26th. Personally, I'm inclined to give SW the benefit of the doubt, and only take action when or if he returns without addressing these concerns. Hopefully his wikibreak has allowed him to rethink his actions, and he returns with a better attitude. A commitment from him to abide by ADMINACCT in the future, and to avoid the kind of IAR actions that brought him here in the first place, is all that is required for him to have my confidence to remain as an admin. ] (] • ]) 08:54, 11 December 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:54, 11 December 2012
Good lord
Whoever closes this RfC should note it has Dream Focus, DGG and me agreeing on something to do with deletion. That should be evidence in and of itself ;p. Ironholds (talk) 15:21, 9 December 2012 (UTC)
ArbCom
I'm torn on the suggestion by S Marshall that this case be referred to ArbCom. If SchuminWeb was continuing to edit whilst ignoring this RfC, such an action would have have my full support. As of now, he hasn't made an edit since the 28th of November, and hasn't used his tools since the 26th. Personally, I'm inclined to give SW the benefit of the doubt, and only take action when or if he returns without addressing these concerns. Hopefully his wikibreak has allowed him to rethink his actions, and he returns with a better attitude. A commitment from him to abide by ADMINACCT in the future, and to avoid the kind of IAR actions that brought him here in the first place, is all that is required for him to have my confidence to remain as an admin. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 08:54, 11 December 2012 (UTC)