Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 23:19, 27 December 2012

Where did you post the text from the Haaretz article? I can't see it. Cheers, --Dailycare (talk) 20:50, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your response. Since you're the editor proposing to change the article, the burden of proof is on you to provide the text, so we can see whether the material is missing. You can post the relevant snippet to the talkpage, for example, so we can see what the source says. Until then, the original version of the article (with this material in) stays up. I believe you accidentally made two reverts within a 24-hour period in this article, which is forbidden, try to avoid doing that in the future. Cheers, --Dailycare (talk) 21:33, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, that article is under 1RR, not 3RR do you did make a mistake, however don't worry I'm not going to report you for that, unless it becomes a custom. Concerning the source, you said in your edit summary that the 8% figure isn't there. This means you have access to the source, unlike most editors. Therefore, please provide it so we can verify if the text is there. --Dailycare (talk) 22:01, 19 November 2012 (UTC)

Hi, I've filed an arbitration enforcement request concerning you here. You can provide your comments if you like. --Dailycare (talk) 20:52, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

Welcome to Misplaced Pages!

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Intuitive guide to Misplaced Pages

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (159.1.15.34) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Shrike (talk)/WP:RX 21:57, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

November 2012

Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Drone attacks in Pakistan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. SMS 21:07, 21 November 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Talkback

SMS 07:23, 22 November 2012 (UTC)

Result of a complaint about your edits at WP:Arbitration enforcement

Please see this result. The complaint is being closed with no block but you are now officially notified of the discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBPIA.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you continue to misconduct yourself on pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Misplaced Pages:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 03:02, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

December 2012

Hello, I'm Zymurgy. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Enhanced interrogation techniques, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Zymurgy (talk) 22:24, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Enhanced interrogation techniques shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Bbb23 (talk) 23:19, 27 December 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.