Misplaced Pages

User talk:Darkness Shines: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 06:37, 28 May 2013 editDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits Talkback: Would someone be so kind to write thank you across to Malik's talk page for me?← Previous edit Revision as of 11:13, 28 May 2013 edit undoDarkness Shines (talk | contribs)31,762 edits Nangparbat: new sectionNext edit →
Line 27: Line 27:
{{talkback|Malik Shabazz|Anti-Muslim pogroms in India|ts=02:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)}} {{talkback|Malik Shabazz|Anti-Muslim pogroms in India|ts=02:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC)}}
:Would someone be so kind to write thank you across to Malik's talk page for me? ] (]) 06:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC) :Would someone be so kind to write thank you across to Malik's talk page for me? ] (]) 06:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

== Nangparbat ==

Please revert and block. ] (]) 11:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:13, 28 May 2013


This is Darkness Shines's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Archiving icon
Archives
This user reserves the right to use profanity on his own talk page.
This user reserves the right to use profanity on his own talk page.


This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Faizan 13:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for personal attacks, again. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  (✉→BWilkins←✎) 15:38, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Darkness Shines (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Block is purely punitive.Darkness Shines (talk) 15:41, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

DS, I kept EC'ing at AN, while trying to talk you away from the edge of the cliff, but gave up after a few times. I watched you put your foot even deeper and deeper in your mouth. It would have been easy to keep from getting blocked there, but you chose the other option. I like you DS and hold no malice against you, but you were wrong and instead of being upfront about it, you basically called him a nationalistic prick again, which is begging to be blocked and demonstrating that a block is the only way to prevent disruption. Declined. Go take a couple days off and come back and ask for an unblock then. Dennis Brown - - © - @ - Join WER 15:48, 27 May 2013 (UTC)


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dennis, I did not call him a nationalist prick again, you are mistaken, I said calling him a prick was over the top, but that he is a nationalist. So I did admit I was wrong. Cheers. Darkness Shines (talk) 15:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
It came across as a backhanded way of saying the same thing, so I can see why the block wasn't punitive. You could have been just blocked without discussion, the discussion was your opportunity to prevent the block, your chance to say "Ok, I was being a prick when I called him a prick. I won't do that again." I kept EC'ing, trying to talk you out of getting yourself blocked, but that comment is where I gave up, figuring nothing I could say would make a difference. On a personal note, when you get wound up, you are like an 8 day clock, wound tight and it will be a long time until you aren't. When you get it right, you get it right, and that is why I like you, but you have to learn to not take stuff personal and when to go have a tea and cool off instead of posting. You are your own worst enemy sometimes. I still recommend you use this time to gather your thoughts before requesting another unblock.
Most days, Misplaced Pages is a much better place for you being here. Today just wasn't one of those days. Dennis Brown - - © - @ - Join WER 16:09, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
It came across the wrong way then And I was not being a prick, I was being an asshole. Catch you on the flip side. Darkness Shines (talk) 16:12, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Darkness Shines. You have new messages at Malik Shabazz's talk page.
Message added 02:53, 28 May 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Would someone be so kind to write thank you across to Malik's talk page for me? Darkness Shines (talk) 06:37, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Nangparbat

Please revert and block. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:13, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

User talk:Darkness Shines: Difference between revisions Add topic