Misplaced Pages

User talk:Erachima: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:21, 12 September 2013 editChrisGualtieri (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers457,369 edits →PAs: oops← Previous edit Revision as of 15:16, 12 September 2013 edit undoChrisGualtieri (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers457,369 edits →PAs: reNext edit →
Line 1,411: Line 1,411:


Despite having no prior interactions, you have made a string of personal attacks and you assume bad faith. Please stop that realize that I am not alone in my disagreement with MOSAM. And note that I didn't even start the discussion or go to the policy fact itself. I have worked tirelessly to improve A&M topics and I've got many articles to GA levels in the last month alone. Your characterization of me as malicious and with a "vendetta" is very rude and I ask you retract your statements and assume good faith. ] (]) 14:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC) Despite having no prior interactions, you have made a string of personal attacks and you assume bad faith. Please stop that realize that I am not alone in my disagreement with MOSAM. And note that I didn't even start the discussion or go to the policy fact itself. I have worked tirelessly to improve A&M topics and I've got many articles to GA levels in the last month alone. Your characterization of me as malicious and with a "vendetta" is very rude and I ask you retract your statements and assume good faith. ] (]) 14:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
: Stay off my page. Thank you. ] (]) 15:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 15:16, 12 September 2013

This user is working himself to death at college, and probably won't be editing actively, except maybe on breaks, for the foreseeable future.
Archive

Talk Page Archives

01 Perm. link 01 11 Perm. link 11
02 Perm. link 02 12 Perm. link 12
03 Perm. link 03 13 Perm. link 13
04 Perm. link 04 14 Perm. link 14
05 Perm. link 05 15 Perm. link 15
06 Perm. link 06 16 Perm. link 16
07 Perm. link 07
08 Perm. link 08
09 Perm. link 09
10 Perm. link 10

This page is archived every 25 topics, by the removal of the oldest 25 topics.

GA holds & fails

I see you closed the GA review on Eglinton Tournament of 1839. It was appropriate for the review to close, since it had been on hold for a week, and it was still some way off. However, I feel that, as the initial reviewer, it was my place to close the review and offer explanations (which I intended to do after the weekend). I invested time in the review, and built up some rapport with the lead editors, through discussion and user talk pages, and feel it only fair that I should be the one to conclude matters. For the editors involved, such an approach would offer less discouragement, especially if they felt they had reached some understanding with me. I understand your concerns about the backlog of "on holds", but wish you had approached me first. That said, I don't hold a grudge, and am not greatly offended! I will, however, bring the matter up at the GAN talk page, to see what consensus is: it might be I've over-reacted to what is standard practice! Gwinva (talk) 23:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. No toes broken... I've commented at the review page and user talk pages as I intended, so all sorted. Sorry if I sounded snotty. Gwinva (talk) 00:36, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Planet Ladder GA review

Hi. This is about the article you reviewed August 27th (that was a long long time ago I know). Anyway, um, you mentioned that the article needed the Japanese release dates. I have searched for them, but haven't found any. Would the Japanese release dates be on Amazon? (Also I followed your advice about the Production/Media sections. If you could look at Planet Ladder and see if anything else still needs to be changed or added, that would be nice.) Thank you. Kaguya-chan (talk) 19:30, 21 January 2009 (UTC)

Firestar's Quest GAN

Hello, you did the first GA review for Firestar's quest and I have fix all the problems. Can you review it again? Gears of War 2 04:17, 8 March 2009 (UTC)

Re:Bleach seasons FT

Thanks a bunch ;) Oh, and a quick question. I remember that you used this website as a source for some episode lists in the past and I used it for a good chunk of my FLs. Could you comment on its reliability, as it was a frequent discussion at WT:ANIME. If it's associated with some company or some official database, it'd be a great help sourcing-wise for a lot of lists. — sephiroth bcr 08:49, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Clarification

Hello, you have been asked to clarify your statement in Misplaced Pages:Miscellany for deletion/User:Afghanpolicy27. Thank you in advance! Kotiwalo (talk) 14:04, 15 August 2009 (UTC)

Template:Talkarchivehist

Hi. I noticed your comment regarding your personal archives at WP:Village pump (policy)#Does talk page archiving violate CC-BY-SA. You may be interested in {{talkarchivehist}}, which incorporates a few permanent links into the standard archive header. It looks like you create your archives in single edits rather than incrementally, so it should be compatible. If you're interested, I could apply it to one of your archives as an example. Flatscan (talk) 05:56, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Neon genesis evangelion

you seem to know how articles work. you tihnk you may help me remove trivial information?Bread Ninja (talk) 19:29, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

80 days

Thanks for the reminder on that one. . . I think I set the precedence of spelling it disambiguaion on the talk page. Sorry about that. --John (User:Jwy/talk) 23:02, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

GAN

The nominator and I have been staying at Wikimania together for the last week, hence the lack of action on his part :). He's informed me IRL that he has a few more tweaks to make before he's satisfied, so I'm going to give him a bit more time on it, since he's on holiday for most of this week as well. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 11:17, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, that's fair enough. Conference was excellent - particularly the bit when after getting a round of applause for a question I asked, I was dragged out of the audience by a moderate and plonked in the panel for a talk. Ironholds (talk) 18:08, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Zaion GAN

Thanks for reviewing the article. I have made some replies at the review, so please review them again at your convenience. Arsonal (talk) 09:21, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Joseph Smith, Jr. GAN

User talk:Gosox5555#Joseph Smith, Jr. GAN Gosox(55)

Aw look...

I upset him. HalfShadow 23:31, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Roger Waters GAN

As far as I understand the reasons you provided for GAN failure had previously been resolved, so could you please reconsider your position, or provide new/different feedback/suggestions that can be resolved? It would be greatly appreciated, since I am not sure what you would reccomend fixing in order to bring the article up to GAN. I guess I am unsure why it is not a GA as it is right now. --GabeMc (talk) 03:16, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Wolfpuss

I think her most recent comment is pretty much 100% sarcasm; she doesn't really want suggestions as far as I can tell. -kotra (talk) 09:56, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

WT:NOT

I have replied on the talk page. patsw (talk) 20:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

RE: Highschool of the Dead edit approval

My apologies, it looked like harmless/good-faith edit by the user. I will be more careful in the future. Thanks for letting me know -- GateKeeper @ 20:55, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Common Pleas

Thanks for reviewing this article; I think I've fixed the points you brought up. Regards, Ironholds (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

rfc/u

Several months and a draft ahead of you: User:Masem/draft though it needs trimming and editing, please feel free to do so. --MASEM (t) 14:16, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Once it's final and I've posted it and notified Gavin, it would need to have 2 additional editors affirm they have tried resolution to allow the case forward. --MASEM (t) 17:42, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Descriptive & segmented article titles

I don't think that closing the discussion is in any way good ettiquette. Do you wish to discuss this matter over at Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette alerts? --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 15:35, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

I have mentioned at Misplaced Pages:Wikiquette alerts that I intend to reopen the discussion at Misplaced Pages talk:Article titles#Descriptive & segmented article titles, but I will pause and give you time to respond. I am open to suggestion as to how the discussion can be modified if you feel that the thread is too long, but if you feel that the proposal has "failed", then I believe you should express your thoughts as to why this is the case, as they will be most welcome. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 10:14, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
For your information, I have made a proposal at Wikiquette alerts that I intend reopeing the discusions at Misplaced Pages talk:Article titles#Descriptive & segmented article titles after starting a thread at WP:Village pump/Policy about the issue revealed in the discussion "Example: Jan Smuts in the Boer War" about segmented article titles and their interaction with WP:UNDUE. If you would like to participate in the thread, let me know. --Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 08:46, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
For your information, I have opened a thread at Misplaced Pages:Village_pump_(policy)#Alternative_article_names to see if there will be any response to the issues raised.--Gavin Collins (talk|contribs) 13:51, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for putting a halt to the ongoing discussion. It was still interesting BUT was chewing up my watchlist and my time in reviewing the remarks! Somebody had to do it! Student7 (talk) 18:19, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Good article nominations

Hi. Please see my comment here. - Richard Cavell (talk) 06:08, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

RE:Highschool of the Dead

Fine, do as you wish.

Let agrees that we disagree.

Note that i advise you to read some animanga FA/GA like School Rumble for what contents belongs to what section because to put it bluntly current contents of the production section have nothing to do with that section.

I do help especially but i won't force my point in any issue so you can disregard my piece of advise. --KrebMarkt (talk) 07:28, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Going farther than showing "my concern" over Highschool of the Dead would require a higher level of involvement from me. This is something, i don't want to because i have no particular interest for the subject. I leave it to the good or bad hands of the editors with affinity to that subject. --KrebMarkt (talk) 09:50, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Aizen Pic

Well, first off, thank you for the wonderful greeting. As a new user, it's very nice to get an actual message instead of "Reverted." So, I noticed that the old image was still up and figured I would change it to the one used on the Bleach Wiki, which I personally thought was better because it showed Aizen for who he was and was therefore more accurate. As we both now know, this backfired instantly, so let's discuss it. You mentioned that it is customary to use images of characters as they appeared but I think this might be an exception because Aizen as he appeared was just an act/illusion (in most anime/manga this is not the case). The only problem my image would cause is that it does spoil the story quite a bit (My intention was not spoil such an awesome conspiracy to new Bleach fans). But the tags are annoying to add. How do I tag the image (and find the tags)? Again, it is from the Bleach wiki, but it doesn't seem to say who owns it, or I can't find the information. Any help is appreciated. Arawn 15:47, 21 July 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arawn V (talk • contribs)

Congregation Beth Jacob Ohev Sholom

Just to let you know, the issues at Congregation Beth Jacob Ohev Sholom and AN/I have all been worked out now. Thank you for your patience. Jayjg 22:55, 22 July 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of fictional magic users

An article that you have been involved in editing, List of fictional magic users, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/List of fictional magic users (2nd nomination). Thank you.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Axem Titanium (talk) 14:46, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

GA Review of Congregation Beth Jacob Ohev Sholom

Hi Erachima,

I don't mean to bother you, but do you plan to return to Misplaced Pages? You started a GA review of Congregation Beth Jacob Ohev Sholom over a month ago, but didn't make any comments on it, and haven't edited since then, so I'm kind of in limbo. Thanks, Jayjg 06:34, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

End of year awards


 The Anime and Manga BarnSakura Award
I award you this BarnSakura in recondition of your contributions to anime and manga articles during 2010 and because everyone deserves a little recondition every once in a while. ;) —Farix (t | c) 03:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

Undeletion request notification

Hi, you participated in a deletion request at commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Wikipe-tan lolicon (2007-01-04). The same files are now being considered for undeletion at commons:Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests#File:LoliWikipetan.jpg. If you're still around we'd appreciate your opinion and feedback. Thanks! Dcoetzee 23:13, 15 June 2011 (UTC)

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Highschool of the Dead

Category:Highschool of the Dead, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 14:43, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Whatever's going on here...

Hi, and thank you for taking notice. By the looks of it, that is a rogue IP used by one experienced blocked/banned user (I could guess who it is, but I don't want to give him the time of day), who known I watchlisted the page and trying to get my attention in the most pathetic way. I think he is gaming the system by posting an insanely crude and inane message then and now (for instance, this one), waiting for the IP to go stale (or changing it), then coming up with tiny reposts to let us know he's still around. If I guessed right about the identity of the user, so I tend to look at this, and then overlook it, in the light of that fact. Dahn (talk) 06:53, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

Various postings by block-evading IP user removed. – Fut.Perf. ☼ 09:00, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Erachima. You have new messages at Cyberpower678's talk page.
Message added 23:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

—cyberpower (X-Mas Chat)(Contrib.) 23:11, 12 December 2011 (UTC)

I apologize for my stubbornness. I hope we can get along as friends from now on.—cyberpower (X-Mas Chat)(Contrib.) 01:23, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 December 2011

Talkback

Hello, Erachima. You have new messages at Mtking's talk page.
Message added 05:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mtking 05:24, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. In Hypochromic anemia, you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Andrew Clark (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:02, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

Joke banner

I'm not going to revert your removal of NWA.Rep's joke banner from his talkpage, as I have already reverted the same edit by Bartsa. But I'm really sorry to see that you think it necessary to kick a guy who is so completely down. The joke isn't that funny, but it's not disruptive by any definition. Removing such harmless things from userpages, which users traditionally have wide latitude to manage themselves, raises the temperature and the mutual hostility in the community, and that is in the long run far more hurtful to the encyclopedia than a silly joke or two (this one wastes editors' time to the tune of what, three seconds?). And no, he can't "fight his own battles", as he has scrambled his password. His one point of pride right now is to retain the banner, which has been there for a long time. I confess I don't think it an important thing in itself, but I can understand how somebody can get very upset about the deletion of his userpage, and try to retain at least this last trace of his personal choice on Misplaced Pages. Please see the discussion on my talkpage. Bishonen | talk 22:40, 16 December 2011 (UTC).

The Signpost: 19 December 2011

The Signpost: 26 December 2011

The Signpost: 02 January 2012


The Signpost: 09 January 2012

The Signpost: 16 January 2012


The Signpost: 23 January 2012

The Signpost: 30 January 2012

The Signpost: 06 February 2012

The Signpost: 13 February 2012

The Signpost: 20 February 2012

The Signpost: 27 February 2012

The Signpost: 05 March 2012

The Signpost: 12 March 2012

The Signpost: 19 March 2012

The Signpost: 26 March 2012

The Signpost: 02 April 2012

The Signpost: 09 April 2012

The Signpost: 16 April 2012

The Signpost: 23 April 2012

The Signpost: 30 April 2012

The Signpost: 07 May 2012

The Signpost: 14 May 2012

The Signpost: 21 May 2012

The Signpost: 28 May 2012

The Signpost: 04 June 2012

The Signpost: 11 June 2012

The Signpost: 18 June 2012

The Signpost: 25 June 2012

The Signpost: 02 July 2012

The Signpost: 09 July 2012

The Signpost: 16 July 2012

The Signpost: 23 July 2012

The Signpost: 30 July 2012

The Signpost: 06 August 2012

The Signpost: 13 August 2012

The Signpost: 20 August 2012

The Signpost: 27 August 2012

The Signpost: 03 September 2012

The Signpost: 10 September 2012

The Signpost: 17 September 2012

The Signpost: 24 September 2012

The Signpost: 01 October 2012

The Signpost: 08 October 2012

The Signpost: 15 October 2012

The Signpost: 22 October 2012

The Signpost: 29 October 2012

The Signpost: 05 November 2012

The Signpost: 12 November 2012

The Signpost: 19 November 2012

The Signpost: 26 November 2012

The Signpost: 03 December 2012

The Signpost: 10 December 2012

The Signpost: 17 December 2012

The Signpost: 24 December 2012

The Signpost: 31 December 2012

The Signpost: 07 January 2013

The Signpost: 14 January 2013

The Signpost: 21 January 2013

The Signpost: 28 January 2013

The Signpost: 04 February 2013

Category:Anime and manga by demographic

Category:Anime and manga by demographic, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Armbrust 09:57, 6 February 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 11 February 2013

The Signpost: 18 February 2013

The Signpost: 25 February 2013

The Signpost: 04 March 2013

The Signpost: 11 March 2013

The Signpost: 18 March 2013

The Signpost: 25 March 2013

The Signpost: 01 April 2013

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2013-06-03

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed between 12-14 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the initial messages I sent out went to only WikiProject members and users that had over 15 reviews).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

  • Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. Now, one of the most important criteria is that you have at least 15 independent reviews. If you are reading this, you are likely 3 (or less) reviews short, so if you review another couple nominations, you can become a recruiter! If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".

NOTE: If you are interested in becoming a recruiter but do not meet the 15 review requirement, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters and put your status as "Not Available" until you have reviewed enough nominations.

  • Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 21:05, 10 June 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2013-06-10

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2013-06-24

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

The Signpost: 24 July 2013

The Signpost: 31 July 2013

Misplaced Pages:Misplaced Pages Signpost/2013-07-29

The Signpost: 07 August 2013

The Signpost: 14 August 2013

The Signpost: 21 August 2013

The Signpost: 28 August 2013

The Signpost: 04 September 2013

PAs

Despite having no prior interactions, you have made a string of personal attacks and you assume bad faith. Please stop that realize that I am not alone in my disagreement with MOSAM. And note that I didn't even start the discussion or go to the policy fact itself. I have worked tirelessly to improve A&M topics and I've got many articles to GA levels in the last month alone. Your characterization of me as malicious and with a "vendetta" is very rude and I ask you retract your statements and assume good faith. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 14:19, 12 September 2013 (UTC)

Stay off my page. Thank you. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 15:16, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
User talk:Erachima: Difference between revisions Add topic