| Revision as of 18:49, 1 October 2013 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,383,189 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Astynax/Archive 12. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:33, 3 October 2013 edit undoDoug Weller (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Autopatrolled, Oversighters, Administrators264,298 edits →List of new religious movements: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| Finished "state terrorism". I was very lazy there, I must admit. Most of it is composed of long quotations. I felt it was for the best: it prevents anyone from accusing me later of distorting the meaning of the author. --] (]) 22:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC) | Finished "state terrorism". I was very lazy there, I must admit. Most of it is composed of long quotations. I felt it was for the best: it prevents anyone from accusing me later of distorting the meaning of the author. --] (]) 22:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == List of new religious movements == | |||
| Please don't do that again. I've reverted you as the RfC was closed with the statement "There is a rough consensus that Landmark Worldwide should not be included this list." There was no point in starting the RfC if you were going to ignore the outcome, and it is precisely because you started the RfC and ignored the outcome that this might be considered disruptive editing. I hope you can understand this. I have no opinion on the issue myself as I haven't been following the debate. ] (]) 08:33, 3 October 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:33, 3 October 2013
| This is Astynax's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17Auto-archiving period: 10 days  |
| Note: contents of this page are periodically archived by a bot. If there have been no recent posts here, that can result in no messages being displayed below. Older messages are still readable in the archives (above). New messages may be added here. If you post a message here, I will usually reply on this page, unless the conversation started on your talk page or elsewhere. |
Rosas
Finished "state terrorism". I was very lazy there, I must admit. Most of it is composed of long quotations. I felt it was for the best: it prevents anyone from accusing me later of distorting the meaning of the author. --Lecen (talk) 22:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
List of new religious movements
Please don't do that again. I've reverted you as the RfC was closed with the statement "There is a rough consensus that Landmark Worldwide should not be included this list." There was no point in starting the RfC if you were going to ignore the outcome, and it is precisely because you started the RfC and ignored the outcome that this might be considered disruptive editing. I hope you can understand this. I have no opinion on the issue myself as I haven't been following the debate. Dougweller (talk) 08:33, 3 October 2013 (UTC)