User:Candleabracadabra/archive2: Difference between revisions

< User:Candleabracadabra Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 15:14, 3 December 2013 editCandleabracadabra (talk \| contribs)25,793 edits →December 2013: fixed← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:20, 3 December 2013 edit undoMadmanBot (talk \| contribs)67,844 edits Notifying user of possible copyvio on Carnegie Library of Albany (newbie/current)Next edit →
Line 372:		Line 372:
	:::Okay with me. I added a bit from the NRHP listing page for the county, but it's pretty generic stuff. If you look at the ] article you will see that it is possible to combine the historic district in with the broader area. I would probably bold the name of the district in a combined article. The combo approach can make for a better article and serve readers well. I am okay with it being split out and prominently linked too. At least linking the districts in with the towns and cities where they are located gives some coverage instead of just a redlink. Take care. Have fun. Happy Holidays. ] (]) 03:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC)		:::Okay with me. I added a bit from the NRHP listing page for the county, but it's pretty generic stuff. If you look at the ] article you will see that it is possible to combine the historic district in with the broader area. I would probably bold the name of the district in a combined article. The combo approach can make for a better article and serve readers well. I am okay with it being split out and prominently linked too. At least linking the districts in with the towns and cities where they are located gives some coverage instead of just a redlink. Take care. Have fun. Happy Holidays. ] (]) 03:54, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
	:::I see not in the Ybor City article it isn't bolded because, although covered in the main article, there is also an ] article. ] (]) 03:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)		:::I see not in the Ybor City article it isn't bolded because, although covered in the main article, there is also an ] article. ] (]) 03:55, 3 December 2013 (UTC)
			==]==
			]
			This is an automated message from ]. I have performed a web search with the contents of ], and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.waymarking.com/waymarks/WM8WBT_Carnegie_Library_of_Albany_Albany_GA.

			It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

			If substantial content is duplicated and it is not ] or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our ] for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see ] for the procedure.){{z117}}<!--This template located at Template:Csb-notice-pageincludes--> ] (]) 18:20, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:20, 3 December 2013

User talk:Candleabracadabra/ARCHIVE1

Having archived my talkpage (I think I did a previous archive which is somewhere out there or just in my deletion log if anyone wants to locate it...)

History: Long Beach bicycle path, Long Beach bike path

These articles I want to be reminded about for possible future action:Illinois Valley Community Hospital (I still think it's notable, perhaps it can at least be merged), Futuristic (rapper) (I think he's notable per substantial coverage in reliable independent sources), Alice Fryer Hall (a borderline case that probably merits at least a merge to the area where she established herself), Parillada (I am not convinced that this should remain simply a redirect, it seems to me to be notable as a distinct for of BBQ or style of BBQ), Swamp Cabbage (film) (notability is marginal but if those involved make additional films it can perhaps be worked into an article on the creator), Sam Branson (if he isn't notable he's very likely to become notable soon) and finally Wendy (webseries), that seems like it would be good to merge somewhere or at least mention in an article about corporate sponsored web films.

Colombian Cuisine

Please do not delete my information. Then I will improve the rest of the information --Theryx7 (talk) 14:50, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Actually, if you look at my edits you will see that I was incorporating what you added while restoring what you deleted. You have still not explained why you have removed so many article links and images. Some of what you've added is poorly written. It's unfortunate that you aren't willing to work more collaboratively with others. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:54, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Well tell me that food is important in the article and I would add food along with my new information. The above information also had many problems.--Theryx7 (talk) 15:02, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

My suggestion would be to add an underconstruction tag at the top so people know when you are actively working on the article. I think that articles on foods and beverages of Colombian cuisine should all be linked to from that article or that article should link to a list of Colombian cuisine foods article. And article links that were lost in your editing should be added back. In addition to the couple I mentioned on your talk page (including the coffee grower's acis), butifara is another regional specialty that comes to mind. You might also look at the Category:Colombian cuisine to make sure they are included. Please let me know if I can be of any assistance. I would be happy to have a look when you are finished working it up. If you do changes section by section and explain your reasoning for changes that can also be helpful. I'm not sure why you're grouping all the photos at the bottom? Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:44, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of J. Mandor Matson

The article J. Mandor Matson has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Seems to fail WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Misplaced Pages are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

Charlotte

I don't really know much of anything about Charlotte, NC, but I'd be glad to help with general editing or stuff like that. Charleston, SC is my hometown, so I tend to stay pretty focused on my substantive work.ProfReader (talk)

Need diffs!

You still need to provide diffs for the AN thread. I tried to find the "snide comment" to DGG, but I couldn't. Please post them ASAP. St Anselm (talk) 01:28, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

John Collins House

Please see Category:All articles sourced only to NRIS; while it's reliable for a few specific pieces of information, NRIS really isn't enough by itself for an article, due especially to numerous errors that it contains. Nyttend (talk) 22:35, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

I see your point but I think the bot tagging is misguided. The project can identify and work on articles sourced only to NRIS, but mass tagging doesn't seem helpful or constructive to me. Many other sources use NRIS anyway, so this approach isn't necessarily useful. Obviously articles should always contain the best and most comprehensive sources possible. We do the best we can. While the Park Service makes lots of mistakes, it is useful for the basic information and provides a good starting point. I don't understand why all the actual nominations for National Register of Historic Places aren't available online. The information in those forms is really the meat of the content and sourcing we need. Thanks for the note. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:33, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

The tagging is basically a specialised form of {{One source}}. Meanwhile, NPS is in the middle of digitising nominations (see File:NRHP nominations upload status.svg for state-by-state details), but they have thousands and thousands left to go; it's not something that they can do overnight. Of course you're right about these forms being the meat of the content, but please note that form citation is 100% different from NRIS-only articles. For one thing, NRIS gives only a few tiny facts from the nominations: when your entire stub is sourced to NRIS, either you're unable to write anything substantial about the site, so it's not really a helpful stub for anyone (but its existence produces tons of mirror pages, which Google finds, thus actually making it harder for someone to research the site), or you add tons of unsourced content. If you cite the nomination form for the site, your page won't end up getting tagged as NRIS-only, since it's citing the nomination form and may be able to have tons of additional information, and at any rate with the nomination you can provide plenty of site-specific informatioon that's not even mentioned in NRIS. Nyttend (talk) 23:08, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for raising that issue at AN. I have left 6 questions for the editor concerned at the end of discussion. In ictu oculi (talk) 00:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

I'm sorry that your articles got deleted and I'm happy to see them restored, along with your "user rights". Thank you for your contributions and your assistance to others in improving articles. Take care and have a great day. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:29, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

sorry

That was a weird edit conflict. Didn't mean to restore your comment.--Obi-Wan Kenobi (talk) 14:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay, no problem. I thought I had left an edit summary noting that I just wasn't sure, but I'm not seeing it now. Anyway, we'll see what progresses in the discussion. Have a happy every day. Candleabracadabra (talk) 14:10, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

Your request at REFUND - Kathleen Peters

I haven't restored the history, because the 2007 version was not about the same person. The whole text was: "She is very rad and nice. She is married to <name>". JohnCD (talk) 15:43, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay. Thank you for looking into it for me. Happy holidays. Candleabracadabra (talk) 15:49, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

(2nd) Nomination of Kevin Bott for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kevin Bott is suitable for inclusion in Misplaced Pages according to Misplaced Pages's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kevin Bott (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

As a participant in the 1st nomination discussion, you may wish to participate in the 2nd.--Ddcm8991 (talk) 17:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

I will have a look. Thanks. Candleabracadabra (talk) 17:41, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

Cite

Amy Bach, Kathryn Sikkink, Gail Buckley, Jonathon Kozol,Jim Wooten‎ and Samuel Hynes. Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:27, 21 November 2013 (UTC) Done by a kind editor. Candleabracadabra (talk) 23:09, 21 November 2013 (UTC)

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Rivergate Tower may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 ""s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.