Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Doctorlaw: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 18:07, 22 January 2014 editSummerPhD (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers91,322 edits →Comments by other users: c← Previous edit Revision as of 20:07, 22 January 2014 edit undoEnric Naval (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers30,509 edits →Comments by other users: writing style looks similar to meNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:
**CU, please check whether ] and ] are sock puppeting; the timing of their edits and deems to think so.] (]) 17:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC) **CU, please check whether ] and ] are sock puppeting; the timing of their edits and deems to think so.] (]) 17:30, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
::::If you believe there is sockpuppetry, you will need to open a new case. Please see ] for instructions. That said, isn't very compelling. - ] (]) 18:07, 22 January 2014 (UTC) ::::If you believe there is sockpuppetry, you will need to open a new case. Please see ] for instructions. That said, isn't very compelling. - ] (]) 18:07, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Just a personal observation, as a user who has edited the AAFM article. The writing style of this user reminds of some socks of Doctorlaw. The personal attacks by the new account also reminds me of the same style. --] (]) 20:07, 22 January 2014 (UTC)


======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>====== ======<span style="font-size:150%">Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments</span>======

Revision as of 20:07, 22 January 2014

Doctorlaw

Doctorlaw (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Doctorlaw/Archive.



20 January 2014

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

Suspected sockpuppets


User editing the same page as a permanently banned user, pursuing the same whitewashed goal, using the same arguments that the current article violates POV. (diff diff diff) (confirmed sock diff confirmed sock diff confirmed sock diff) This happens every year or so, sometimes more often. The user pages for Doctorlaw's socks also tended to be just a repetition of the user name, like EconomicTiger. The last time EconomicTiger's edits were reverted, User:Socialjustus made legal threats and was banned before a sockpuppet investigation could commence (see this edit); EconomicTiger then withdrew from activity on the page and so no sockpuppet investigation was launched. RJC Contribs 22:17, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

I had a break on Misplaced Pages for a different issue which is nothing to with AAFM. User:RJC applies his/her Synthesis everywhere. This is a pure Synthesis and OR, "The user pages for Doctorlaw's socks also tended to be just a repetition of the user name, like EconomicTiger. The last time EconomicTiger's edits were reverted, User:Socialjustus made legal threats and was banned before a sockpuppet investigation could commence (see this edit); EconomicTiger then withdrew from activity on the page and so no sockpuppet investigation was launched."

This editor while claiming I am whitewashing, he himself or she herself has something deep in stake against the AAFM where they dispute with me. There are number of possible Sockpuppets and Meatpuppets to support him/her.EconomicTiger (talk) 02:24, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

  • Please see SummerPhD's comment on Talk:AAFM. Also note the connected AN/I report here. It's telling that EconomicTiger's reaction to any editor who opposes his edits is that they must be doing so because they have something against AAFM (although in my case they got their wires crossed and claimed that I was in some way in league with AAFM). BMK: Grouchy Realist (talk) 10:15, 21 January 2014 (UTC)
    • I added User:Beyond8 to the sock list. Brand-new editor, their first (and only at this point) edit is a comment at Talk:AAFM with the same old tired complaints we've heard many times before from Doctorlaw: how other editors are biased against the organization, etc. etc. etc. Obviously a sock, quacks and all. BMK: Grouchy Realist (talk) 00:34, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
If you believe there is sockpuppetry, you will need to open a new case. Please see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations for instructions. That said, this isn't very compelling. - SummerPhD (talk) 18:07, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Just a personal observation, as a user who has edited the AAFM article. The writing style of this user reminds of some socks of Doctorlaw. The personal attacks by the new account also reminds me of the same style. --Enric Naval (talk) 20:07, 22 January 2014 (UTC)

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments
Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Doctorlaw: Difference between revisions Add topic