| Revision as of 16:32, 29 January 2014 editMsnicki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers10,358 edits →Conversation move: rm closed item. discussion has moved back to the article talk page.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:50, 1 February 2014 edit undoDr. Blofeld (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors636,316 edits →Jazmín ChebarNext edit → | ||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
| :New entries added to either ] and ] should be supported by an article that establishes the notability of the language or the individual. But it's not sufficient simply to create an article and call it done. The article must contain evidence that the topic meets our notability standards at ], which requires that multiple reliable independent secondary sources have discussed the topic. You can't just create your own ] with the only citations being to some wikis you've created and expect that to be accepted here. ] (]) 16:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | :New entries added to either ] and ] should be supported by an article that establishes the notability of the language or the individual. But it's not sufficient simply to create an article and call it done. The article must contain evidence that the topic meets our notability standards at ], which requires that multiple reliable independent secondary sources have discussed the topic. You can't just create your own ] with the only citations being to some wikis you've created and expect that to be accepted here. ] (]) 16:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == ] == | |||
| This isn't the first time you've wrongly taken an article to AFD is it? You should know by now that ] is one of the good eggs here, an administrator who is one of our most experienced content editors. Continue to nominate things in bad faith when there's sources available and I'll have you banned from nominating on here. I strongly advise you to withdraw the nom, otherwise you'll have editors other than myself complaining too. Taking to AFD within 15 minutes of creating is surely not working in the spirit of wikipedia. If you're in doubt again look in google books. ♦ ] 20:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 20:50, 1 February 2014
|
The Editor's Barnstar | |
| for being so clear eyed, consistent, and even in tone while working on the whole Deluna page/umpteen socks investigation. Good work!Tao2911 (talk) 21:05, 24 August 2011 (UTC) |
My goodness. Thank you. Msnicki (talk) 21:19, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| For keeping peace and letting everybody use their opportunities. APS (Full Auto) (talk) 22:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC) |
Thank you! Msnicki (talk) 22:45, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
|
The Barnstar of Integrity | |
| Your one of the best debaters I have seen in some time. I have great respect for you my new friend. Moxy (talk) 20:22, 10 January 2014 (UTC) |
About your Deletions
You told me that I need to Write the Article first........ IT WAS WRITEN BUT YOU DELETED IT!
Thanks for beeing so ""hospitable"" with newbies..................... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alina Citea (talk • contribs) 06:45, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
- New entries added to either List of programming languages and List of programmers should be supported by an article that establishes the notability of the language or the individual. But it's not sufficient simply to create an article and call it done. The article must contain evidence that the topic meets our notability standards at WP:GNG, which requires that multiple reliable independent secondary sources have discussed the topic. You can't just create your own WP:Autobiography with the only citations being to some wikis you've created and expect that to be accepted here. Msnicki (talk) 16:31, 29 January 2014 (UTC)
Jazmín Chebar
This isn't the first time you've wrongly taken an article to AFD is it? You should know by now that User:Rosiestep is one of the good eggs here, an administrator who is one of our most experienced content editors. Continue to nominate things in bad faith when there's sources available and I'll have you banned from nominating on here. I strongly advise you to withdraw the nom, otherwise you'll have editors other than myself complaining too. Taking to AFD within 15 minutes of creating is surely not working in the spirit of wikipedia. If you're in doubt again look in google books. ♦ Dr. Blofeld 20:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)