Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:05, 18 February 2014

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

I hope you'll consider responding

Hi, Toddst, I hope you will consider responding to the thread on ANI criticizing a block of yours, or to the criticism here on this page. Please take your time, but it would be helpful to get your angle on the business. Both sides should be heard, and I don't think people are out to lynch you. Bishonen | talk 15:19, 3 February 2014 (UTC).

Hi Bish. Todd sent me an email and asked me to let you know that he's on a Wiki break and unable to respond (until around 2015).--v/r - TP 22:30, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

A non-response through an intermediary?!? Is that the new transparency and accountability standard re WP:ADMINACCT?!? (Wow.) Ihardlythinkso (talk) 05:38, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Per User:Toddst1/monobook.js Todd will be physically unable to log into wikipedia, unless he gets some admin to delete/edit this script for him. Looks like that will last until 1/1/2015. Gaijin42 (talk) 22:35, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

I see. Thank you, Gaijin and TParis. I just this minute posted a question about it on ANI, to Newyorkbrad. Considering the content of the ANI thread, I might as well leave it there to be answered, for the information of others. Bishonen | talk 22:40, 3 February 2014 (UTC).

Todd, should you wish to undo this action, and don't want to have someone else edit the page for you, I believe adding "&useskin=vector" will turn off monobook for you and let you edit the monobook script. Gaijin42 (talk) 23:07, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Actually, it's much easier than that: just turn Javascript off in your browser. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 23:08, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Good gents, when someone feels that it's necessary to use a scripted enforced method to keep them off the site, don't you think giving them quick 'get-arounds' kind of defeats the purpose in the first place?--v/r - TP 23:31, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Its not like we are offering heroin to a recovering addict (at least I don't think so). Such actions can be taken rashly and be regretted. (How many people regret jumping out a window on the way down?) He still has two affirmative steps he must take to come back, so the reminder of his intent is still available. But I do take your point :) Gaijin42 (talk) 23:34, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

"How many people regret jumping out a window on the way down?" I've actually wondered that, myself. I mean, it's not like they can fill out a survey on the way down.--v/r - TP 23:36, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

Sometimes they survive and report regret: "I instantly realized that everything in my life that I’d thought was unfixable was totally fixable—except for having just jumped." ---Sluzzelin talk 04:45, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

User:Guardian of the Rings

Heads up. User talk:Guardian of the Rings is reverting several of your sock tags. I issued a Level3 warning. -- Alexf 14:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

ac case

Misplaced Pages:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Involvement_and_accountability NE Ent 15:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)