Revision as of 03:20, 26 March 2014 editErpert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers48,337 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:21, 26 March 2014 edit undoHullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers96,059 edits →Hunter Bryce: reply, obvious error in keep argumentNext edit → | ||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
Fails WP:PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, only nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content beyond the minimal details from an obituary. PROD removed with the comment that the subject "Was notable outside of pornography"; but there is not a shred of evidence supporting this unexplained claim. ] (]) 03:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC) | Fails WP:PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, only nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content beyond the minimal details from an obituary. PROD removed with the comment that the subject "Was notable outside of pornography"; but there is not a shred of evidence supporting this unexplained claim. ] (]) 03:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
*'''Keep'''. If you were paying attention, reads: ''"Was notable outside of pornography; added ref (and cat)"''; to which I indeed added a reference. '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 03:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC) | *'''Keep'''. If you were paying attention, reads: ''"Was notable outside of pornography; added ref (and cat)"''; to which I indeed added a reference. '''<span style="color:orange;">Erpert</span>''' <small><sup><span style="color:yellow;">]</span></sup></small> 03:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC) | ||
**No. You're dead wrong. You didn't add any references; you added an additional citation to an existing reference. The content and category you added didn't deal with work "outside pornography"; it reported she was signed to/worked for Type 9 models, which is indisputably a '''porn talent agency'''. Us somebody's not paying attention, it wouldn't be me. ] (]) 04:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:21, 26 March 2014
Hunter Bryce
- Hunter Bryce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Fails WP:PORNBIO and the GNG. No awards, only nominations. No independent reliable sourcing. No reliably sourced biographical content beyond the minimal details from an obituary. PROD removed with the comment that the subject "Was notable outside of pornography"; but there is not a shred of evidence supporting this unexplained claim. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 03:13, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Keep. If you were paying attention, the entire edit summary reads: "Was notable outside of pornography; added ref (and cat)"; to which I indeed added a reference. Erpert 03:20, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- No. You're dead wrong. You didn't add any references; you added an additional citation to an existing reference. The content and category you added didn't deal with work "outside pornography"; it reported she was signed to/worked for Type 9 models, which is indisputably a porn talent agency. Us somebody's not paying attention, it wouldn't be me. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 04:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)