| Revision as of 08:38, 23 August 2014 editAstbam (talk | contribs)192 edits →3RR nomination 23 August 2014: add← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:12, 23 August 2014 edit undoCharlesdrakew (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers52,316 edits Final warning: Adding original research, including unpublished syntheses of sources on Vauxhall bus station. (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| I would have thought that if my edits were in violation of policy as asserted, it would have been a very simple exercise for the objecting editor to highlight the relevant section. Only conclusion I have been able to draw from the deletions without response is that the assertion my post is in breach of policy is without foundation. ] (]) 08:38, 23 August 2014 (UTC) | I would have thought that if my edits were in violation of policy as asserted, it would have been a very simple exercise for the objecting editor to highlight the relevant section. Only conclusion I have been able to draw from the deletions without response is that the assertion my post is in breach of policy is without foundation. ] (]) 08:38, 23 August 2014 (UTC) | ||
| == August 2014 == | |||
| ] You may be '''] without further warning''' the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's ] by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at ]. <!-- Template:uw-nor4 --> ] (]) 09:12, 23 August 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 09:12, 23 August 2014
External Link
Hi,
The reason I removed the gallery because it's a fansite and the gallery is also self published. If people wanted to see pictures of buses they'll look for them. And can you please stick to one account.
CourtneyBonnick (talk) 15:56, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Misplaced Pages, as you did at Vauxhall bus station. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. –Davey2010 • (talk) 02:55, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
Edit Warring
Hello, Please refrain from edit warring, You've been politely told your additions can't be added as they fail NOTDIR and NOTTRAVEL, Thank you. –Davey2010 • (talk) 18:53, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
Your recent editing history at Vauxhall bus station shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Charles (talk) 09:21, 17 August 2014 (UTC)
3RR nomination 23 August 2014
For when the WP:3RR nomination 23 August 2014.
The posts I have made to Vauxhall bus station were rejected by said editor on the basis that was in breach of WP:NOTDIR and WP:NOTTRAVEL.. Hence the two sections were copy-pasted to the article's talk page, and it asked the relevant section/s pertaining to the breach be highlighted. The objecting editor elected not to do so, but simply delete.
In response to the above threat to impose an edit war block, the request was again made on the editor's talk page. Again this was deleted without response.
I would have thought that if my edits were in violation of policy as asserted, it would have been a very simple exercise for the objecting editor to highlight the relevant section. Only conclusion I have been able to draw from the deletions without response is that the assertion my post is in breach of policy is without foundation. Astbam (talk) 08:38, 23 August 2014 (UTC)
August 2014
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Misplaced Pages's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Vauxhall bus station. Charles (talk) 09:12, 23 August 2014 (UTC)