Revision as of 08:53, 17 July 2014 editDPL bot (talk | contribs)Bots671,263 edits dablink notification message (see the FAQ)← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:04, 30 August 2014 edit undoDreadstar (talk | contribs)53,180 editsm →My pageNext edit → | ||
(4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 112: | Line 112: | ||
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC) | It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these ]. Thanks, ] (]) 08:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC) | ||
==My page== | |||
You come to my page and leave comments, you'd best sign them and leave them in a proper order. If you cannot do that, then stay off my talk page. And you'd best read the policies you quote to others, for example where you do not understand what I'm - I '''suppose''' I am quoting the policy where it says '""]. Pay attention, eh? ] <small>]</small> 22:04, 30 August 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:04, 30 August 2014
Welcome
|
Disambiguation link notification for September 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Organ donation in the United States prison population, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hypoxia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:29, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you Mr. bot AioftheStorm (talk) 13:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 26
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Betty Hay, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page American (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 26 December 2013 (UTC)
Categorization of plant articles
Hi, welcome to Misplaced Pages! The system for categorizing plant articles is not well documented so it's not surprising that mistakes get made. (I've been trying to explain it a bit better this morning.) There are separate category hierarchies for taxa and for taxa by rank. See the first two sections at WP:PLANTS/Categorization. So there should be a category Category:Podocarpaceae genera as well as a category Category:Podocarpaceae.
Whether this parallel system is necessary or desirable is open to debate, but it is widely used in plant articles. Peter coxhead (talk) 12:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
- I see, thank you for letting me know. I hadn't noticed this being the case for most plant categories, so I thought Category:Podocarpaceae genera was the exception and not the norm. Does the same hold true for taxonomies for animal, fungi, etc?AioftheStorm (talk) 00:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
- See e.g. Category:Genera. Coverage over the tree of life is very patchy indeed (and quite often not correctly set up). For genera, birds seem to be covered well, other organisms generally not. Hence this category system doesn't seem useful to me for most groups of organisms because you can't actually use it for navigation. User:Hesperian did quite a bit of work at one time building it up for angiosperms, where the coverage is fairly good. I think that actually Category:Podocarpaceae genera was an exception for gymnosperms, and what I should have done was empty it and ask for it to be deleted, rather than populate it, fairly pointlessly. Sigh...
- The important point, though, is that the "taxonomic category hierarchy" should always exist, and is distinct from the "taxonomic rank category hierarchy" in those groups where this latter exists. I don't at present see that it's worth creating the "rank" version if it doesn't exist. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:09, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
Incorrect use of PROD
Please use WP:PROD tags only in article space. I noticed you PRODed several articles in the Misplaced Pages:Articles for Creation space. I dePRODed them and instead nominated most of them for speedy deletion as hoaxes. Thanks. Safiel (talk) 01:43, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
- I will go ahead and do that then, thanks. I had actually consulted CSD about this and asked if they should be SD'ed or PRODed and while most agreed they could be SD'ed no one appeared to realize that they couldn't be PRODed and one editor told me it would probably be a gentler option to SD so I did that. Perhaps the PRODing guidelines should be updated since they were probably written before AFC was a thing and just never considered the possibility of large amounts of pseudo-article content existing in the WikiTalk space.AioftheStorm (talk) 02:00, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 23
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Integrating factor, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Separable differential equation (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Microbeads (research)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Microbeads (research), and it appears to include material copied directly from http://wpedia.goo.ne.jp/enwiki/Microbeads.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Misplaced Pages:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 17
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Microbeads, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Melting temperature. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
My page
You come to my page and leave comments, you'd best sign them and leave them in a proper order. If you cannot do that, then stay off my talk page. And you'd best read the policies you quote to others, for example where you do not understand what I'm "supposed" to be quoting - I suppose I am quoting the policy where it says '""It is not normally appropriate to edit or remove another editor's comment. Exceptions include to remove obvious trolling or vandalism.... Pay attention, eh? Dreadstar ☥ 22:04, 30 August 2014 (UTC)