| Revision as of 10:28, 8 October 2014 editPBS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled116,854 edits →You are now subject to a topic ban from all articles related to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:47, 8 October 2014 edit undoPBS (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled116,854 edits I topic banned you for being disruptiveNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| You may appeal this sanction using the process described ] except to the ] rather than the ]. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. ] (]) 10:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC) | You may appeal this sanction using the process described ] except to the ] rather than the ]. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. ] (]) 10:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC) | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| From my talk page: | |||
| :I may not be entirely clear but it seems that you topic banned me for three months for saying I planned on violating a moratorium which doesn't exist by hold a Request for Comment and that to do so is "disruptive". Is this correct? Would you like to revisit this ban, because I'm rather bewildered. ] (]) 21:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
| ::To keep the conversation in one place, if you wish to ask me anything else, you can do so on this talk page and I will reply here. | |||
| When I you on this talk page about the sanctions, I included a final sentence that read: | |||
| *If you have any questions about then feel free to ask me. | |||
| If you did not understand that message, you should have asked me for clarification. | |||
| The second sentence of the linked post stated: | |||
| :{{green|There comes a point where continual debate over the name of an article becomes ] and I think that now there have seven requests this year with four requests in the last two months, and many other sections taken up with discussions about the name, that point has been reached.}} | |||
| The fifth and final sentence stated: | |||
| :{{red|In the mean time If I think that editors are being disruptive over this issue then I will take administrative action under the ] that apply to this page.}} | |||
| I topic banned you for being disruptive (per the green sentence above). But I timed the length of the topic ban so that if anyone starts a ] early next year you can participate in it once you ban has ended.<small> By the way (as an aside) you should use ] for requesting a page move not an RfC which is a more general process and is not tailored to page moves as is the ] process.</small> | |||
| -- ] (]) 23:47, 8 October 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:47, 8 October 2014
You are now subject to a topic ban from all articles related to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed
You were notified of the editing restrictions applying to all pages broadly related to the Syrian Civil War (19:11, 7 October 2014)
The following sanction now applies to you:
You have been sanctioned due to these edits
For disruption for stating that you will "be putting together an RfC on the subject in the next week or so" and so directly ignoring my suggested moratorium made in the notification of sanctions on the Syrian Civil War. Since my post all other editors who have expressed an interest have supported the moratorium, and as indicted by your second post you intend to alter the wording in the articles of the name even if you can not get a consensus to change the article titles.
You are topic banned from editing all articles and talk pages related to Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed for a period of three months from the date on which this notice is given.
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the community sanctions authorised for this topic area. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions for that decision. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.
Do not remove this sanction template or its content until after the ban ends.
You may appeal this sanction using the process described here except to the administrators' noticeboard rather than the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. PBS (talk) 10:28, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
From my talk page:
- I may not be entirely clear but it seems that you topic banned me for three months for saying I planned on violating a moratorium which doesn't exist by hold a Request for Comment and that to do so is "disruptive". Is this correct? Would you like to revisit this ban, because I'm rather bewildered. GraniteSand (talk) 21:22, 8 October 2014 (UTC)
- To keep the conversation in one place, if you wish to ask me anything else, you can do so on this talk page and I will reply here.
When I notified you on this talk page about the sanctions, I included a final sentence that read:
- If you have any questions about this post then feel free to ask me.
If you did not understand that message, you should have asked me for clarification.
The second sentence of the linked post stated:
- There comes a point where continual debate over the name of an article becomes DISRUPTIVE and I think that now there have seven requests this year with four requests in the last two months, and many other sections taken up with discussions about the name, that point has been reached.
The fifth and final sentence stated:
- In the mean time If I think that editors are being disruptive over this issue then I will take administrative action under the general sanctions that apply to this page.
I topic banned you for being disruptive (per the green sentence above). But I timed the length of the topic ban so that if anyone starts a WP:RM early next year you can participate in it once you ban has ended. By the way (as an aside) you should use WP:RM for requesting a page move not an RfC which is a more general process and is not tailored to page moves as is the WP:RM process.