Misplaced Pages

Template:Third-party inline/doc: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Template:Third-party inline Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:04, 4 November 2014 editWhatamIdoing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers122,279 edits TemplateData← Previous edit Revision as of 01:07, 4 November 2014 edit undoWhatamIdoing (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers122,279 edits Add autovalue for dateNext edit →
Line 32: Line 32:
"label": "Date", "label": "Date",
"description": "Month and year, e.g. January 2015", "description": "Month and year, e.g. January 2015",
"suggested": true "suggested": true,
"autovalue": "{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}"
}, },
"reason": { "reason": {

Revision as of 01:07, 4 November 2014

This is a documentation subpage for Template:Third-party inline.
It may contain usage information, categories and other content that is not part of the original template page.

This template is used in articles to identify sentences or short passages that have an inline citation but improperly reference a source that is biased because of very close connection to the subject, such as the manufacturer of a product.

Usage

Place this template inline, {{third-party-inline|date=January 2025}} following the word or punctuation.

It produces a superscripted notation like the following:

This is a fantastic product.

Use this template to "tag" dubious information or analysis which cites references produced by someone close to the subject of the article, so that other editors can know to back up the statement with citations, per Misplaced Pages:Verifiability.

You may also (shown below) include a |reason= note, to leave a better record for future editors. For example, the following usage might be appropriate to the arguable claim that "This is a fantastic product...":

{{third-party-inline|reason=citation is the company's website, there must be more objective sources for this|date=January 2025}}

Note that if you do not add |date=, a bot will date your entry with the month and year at a later time.

Adding this template to an article places the article into one of a family of categories identifying "Articles lacking reliable references". To find all such articles, see Category:All articles lacking reliable references.

When not to use this template

Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons should be removed immediately. Do not tag it—remove it. For more information, see the section on poorly sourced contentious material in the Biography of Living Persons policy.

Material which is doubtful and harmful may be removed immediately, rather than tagged. See WP:BURDEN.

If no reference is given, use the {{citation needed}} tag instead.

If you have the time and ability to find an a better reference, please do so. Then correct the citation yourself, or correct the article text. After all, the ultimate goal is not to merely identify problems, but to fix them.

TemplateData

Use this to mark a specific statement as needing support from a third-party or independent source.

Template parameters

ParameterDescriptionTypeStatus
Datedate

Month and year, e.g. January 2015

Auto value
{{subst:CURRENTMONTHNAME}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}
Unknownsuggested
Reasonreason

Why this statement needs a third-party source

Stringoptional

See also

Inline templates

Whole article templates

  • {{Third-party}}, equivalent when the article in general lacks tertiary sources
  • {{Cite check}}, article/section may have inappropriate or misinterpreted citations
  • {{Refimprove}}, article/section has weak or incomplete sources/references/citations
  • {{Unreferenced}}, zero sources cited on entire page
Inline cleanup tags
Attribution
Clarity
Miscellaneous
Neutrality
Precision
Excessive
Time-sensitivity
Verifiability
Dubious
Bare URLs
Incomplete or broken citation
Missing or problematic reference
Wording
General advice