Revision as of 15:55, 15 November 2014 view sourcePeacemaker67 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators95,460 edits yippee, idiot. Register and stop hiding behind a dynamic IP. No-one cares what you issue is. If you need medication, take it.← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:10, 15 November 2014 view source Ronhjones (talk | contribs)416,566 edits You have been blocked from editing. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
Sorry for taking too long to respond on the GAN nomination page. I was away from town for a few days without internet access. I'll get to it in the next day or two.--] (]) 18:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC) | Sorry for taking too long to respond on the GAN nomination page. I was away from town for a few days without internet access. I'll get to it in the next day or two.--] (]) 18:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
:No worries, if you could just address the two major issues, I'll finish up the review. Regards, ] (]) 07:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC) | :No worries, if you could just address the two major issues, I'll finish up the review. Regards, ] (]) 07:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC) | ||
== November 2014 == | |||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 Week''' for '''Edit Warring and Personal Attacks'''. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to ]. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may ] by adding the following text below this notice: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "tlx|" code. -->{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=''Your reason here ~~~~''}}. However, you should read the ] first. ]<sup>]</sup> 16:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)</div><!-- Template:uw-block --> |
Revision as of 16:10, 15 November 2014
G'day. If you have got something to say, pull up a pew and say it (but please follow the rules). There are three rules here:
- If you post on this page, I will (usually) reply on this page, in order to stop conversations from becoming fragmented;
- If you are the type of editor that rarely contributes in article space, one that prefers to moan endlessly about mouseshit on article talk pages without actually editing those articles using reliable sources, you will soon find that I am not interested in encouraging what I consider to be disruptive behaviour. If I don't respond to you, and you are wondering if this might be what I think about your approach to editing, don't be surprised if I refuse to engage in discussion with you; and
- If you are an editor that has posted here and had your post deleted without a response, or with an edit summary telling you to go away, don't post here again. If you have a complaint against me, there are places on WP to do that, this is not one of them. If this is you, repeated postings will result in a complaint by me against you for wikihounding. If you are intent on demonstrating that you are completely delusional, especially in areas covered by Arbitration Committee rulings, then you may find that you reap the whirlwind.
This is NOT the place to ignore all rules...
My Talk Archives |
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 2 sections are present. |
Your GA nomination of Yugoslav monitor Sava
The article Yugoslav monitor Sava you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Yugoslav monitor Sava for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Sturmvogel 66 -- Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 20:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
GAN
Sorry for taking too long to respond on the GAN nomination page. I was away from town for a few days without internet access. I'll get to it in the next day or two.--Saxum (talk) 18:25, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
- No worries, if you could just address the two major issues, I'll finish up the review. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 07:46, 14 November 2014 (UTC)
November 2014
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 Week for Edit Warring and Personal Attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Ronhjones 16:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)