Misplaced Pages

This is IndianBio's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Misplaced Pages? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help. Assume good faith Be polite and avoid personal attacks Be welcoming to newcomers Seek dispute resolution if needed

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45Auto-archiving period: 15 days

Lady Gaga

I only ever made one incorrect edit. Don't go one my page and scold me for "disruptive" editing and threatening to ban me. I've done more than my fair share of good work on this site, so don't go around and take one incorrect edit as a reason to ban me. ~ shy1520

(talk page stalker) the reference you inserted was fabricated, Shy1520. That is absolutely unacceptable. Snuggums (talk / edits) 06:19, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

In other words @Shy1520:, fall off that high horse that you are riding coz Misplaced Pages ain't tolerating it. You made a deliberate fabrication, got warned for it. Next time you do it, you will get reported, simple. —Indian:BIO 13:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

1989 World Tour

The reason why I reverted the tour page was just to add more dates, and a source from USA Today just so that info could be there stored. Then put back the re-direct. Have a good day ~ HappyAppy10

Adding timestamp for archive. —Indian:BIO 07:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Link errors on Roar (song)

Hello,

In the Charts section of Roar (song), the link for the UK Singles (Official Charts Company) #1 position does not work (page not found). I think this is the proper link, but I have no idea how to replace the wrong link (I'm unfamiliar with that referencing style). The same problem occurs with Scotland but I cannot find the Scottish chart to give you the right link. At least please replace the UK link. Thanks! Dontreader (talk) 23:32, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

I found the correct link for the Scottish chart, here. Thanks again. Dontreader (talk) 23:40, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

@Dontreader: I will take a look. —Indian:BIO 06:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. You have much more experience on Misplaced Pages, and you do such a great job with music-related articles, so that's why I asked for your help. Please ping me again when you have had a chance to fix the problems. I'm really surprised at how mysterious the UK link seems to me. I searched for it for several minutes using different techniques, and could not find it. The Scottish one might be easier. Dontreader (talk) 06:36, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

@Dontreader: Thanks and I have corrected it. —Indian:BIO 06:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Misplaced Pages appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tony Bennett and Lady Gaga: Cheek to Cheek Live!, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bob Cox. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:09, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Lady Gaga vidcaps

Following the NFCR discussion I have opened a DR at Misplaced Pages:Files for deletion/2014 November 19#Lady_Gaga_vidcaps. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:18, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

artRAVE

Please let me know how my corretion about the artRAVE stage is incorrect? The stage building at the artRAVE is reminiscent to Mount Olympus from Hercules , not Atlantica from The Little Mermaid .

It is you who is vandalizing that page by deliberately removing correct information, and I notice it isn't the first time. At the top of your talk page, there is a section named "Lady Gaga", and quoting the author, "I only ever made one incorrect edit. Don't go one my page and scold me for "disruptive" editing and threatening to ban me. I've done more than my fair share of good work on this site, so don't go around and take one incorrect edit as a reason to ban me". I have to ask you to stop this foolery, and get your facts straight. Squidoh (talk) 14:08, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

@Squidoh: there is a pillar of Misplaced Pages known as WP:VERIFIABILITY and WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH. Please go through them and then come and lecture me. Kapish? —Indian:BIO 14:12, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

@IndianBio: *capisce :) Squidoh (talk) 19:24, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Love Won't Wait

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Love Won't Wait you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esprit15d -- Esprit15d (talk) 18:01, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Love Won't Wait

The article Love Won't Wait you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Love Won't Wait for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Esprit15d -- Esprit15d (talk) 19:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

Undoing "Bang-Bang" song' page

Hello. I was a little confused by undoing my changes in the page Bang Bang (My Baby Shot Me Down).
My changes:
The last line in the Cover Version section was my edit.
I'd appreciate it if you could tell me the reason so I could be more careful next time.

You did not add any reference to indicate that the person covered the song. —Indian:BIO 05:05, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Born to Die (Lana Del Rey album)

Hi, IndianBio, I can't remove incorrect source because several other admins are watching. I pointed "alternative" in the infobox from source that is she won "Best Alternative " on MTV EMA, not the album. 183.171.182.40 (talk) 13:38, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

I don't understand, what? —Indian:BIO 13:39, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Bad faith

I would really appreciate it if you stop making hostile comments towards me on talk pages, assuming bad faith about my edits, and otherwise being rude to me. I have tried to be civil with you on many occasions and I'm not sure why I don't deserve that same respect. Misplaced Pages is a collaborative project and, to be frank, your behavior and repeated bad-faith assumptions are threatening to harm that.

Regarding your comments on Snuggums' talk, I don't have a vendetta against any WikiProject. I feel that there are many pop singers on Misplaced Pages who have unnecessary articles for non-notable songs of theirs, and I began with the Rihanna discussions because she is arguably the most prominent example. I have also participated in similar discussions for Timberlake, Swift, Spears, Cyrus, and yes Gaga songs. Furthermore, I can take criticism, but what I don't appreciate are comments you have made in the past where you call my work "shit". There is a fine line between constructive criticism and outright being rude, and surely you can understand that. –Chase (talk / contribs) 18:36, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Chasewc91: I would also really appreciate that you stop your bad faith in your edits and your WP:OWN attitude and I DGAF that you find me rude. And yes, you do have a vendetta against the Rihanna project and not only me, Calvin999 as well as Tomica has also realized that. And you can take constructive criticism? Just because two of your edits I called as shitty, you went ahead and nominated a sandbox for deletion. Guess what? Grow a thick skin. I think I should commit suicide because OMG, my latest GA nomination was not passed! —Indian:BIO 18:55, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

I deleted my sandbox because I was not interested in collaborating with someone who was attacking my work, especially when the draft was being made for the purpose of taking it to peer review to have it looked at by other editors – ones who I can assure you would not refer to editors' work as "shit" or the like.

Again, if you can't realize the difference between offering constructive criticism and criticizing by making rude comments, and if you insist on assuming bad-faith towards other editors like you who are only working towards improving the project, perhaps you need to brush up on Misplaced Pages's civility policies. –Chase (talk / contribs) 18:58, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Chasewc91: charity begins at home, so start the good faith in your own edits and then lecture me. Kthnx. —Indian:BIO 19:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Making edits you don't personally agree with does not constitute as bad faith. –Chase (talk / contribs) 19:05, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

@Chasewc91: if you truly see it, I had never before said your edits were bad faith until the nomination of "Raining Men" and the vast horde of Rihanna articles for AFD. That tripped my filter. I cannot possibly hold good faith in your edits, and it appears so deliberate and petty. I have to see Calvin999's conclusion on this about you being on a vendetta. Yes, I know I have even nominated some of the Rihanna, Miley and Taylor articles but I analyzed each one on a case-by-case basis and have concluded that nothing warrants a mass deletion. Your reasoning is to create a precedence just because Rihanna is the most populous article? Coupled with your inability to accept other people's opinion (this very moment on the image of Gaga) is a Times Billboard add for bad-faith edit pattern. Do you think its a wonder that not only me, but others have the same problem about you? I mean I love Katy Perry and Madonna, and I also have loved Gaga from Artpop era, but I accept that these articles are not always perfect. But when they are, they are standalone worthy. —Indian:BIO 19:14, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

And I simply didn't think they were worthy of standalone articles because of notability concerns. Again, edits you personally disagree with ≠ bad faith edits. –Chase (talk / contribs) 19:15, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Chase, you cannot clap with one-hand. My disagreement of your edit is not equal to the bad faith I find in you now. If the two were mutually inclusive then my support of Whitney's article would have been an oppose. You made a mistake with the Riri articles, accept and move on. However, what you were rilying up on Snugg's page is exactly the same problem people have with you. There are articles in the Gaga project that would be SNOWKEPT if nominated. The mere suggestion of trying to merge them so that an article you want to work on has a better chance of being FA, not done buddy. Now I hope you see why your actions are always taken in bad faith, because they are indeed insincere. —Indian:BIO 19:25, 26 November 2014 (UTC)