| Revision as of 13:50, 24 December 2014 editGraniteSand (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,099 edits re P123, don't sweat it.← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:21, 28 December 2014 edit undoP-123 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users13,841 edits →Your comment on the Lead in ISISNext edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| :Forgive me for making that post. I was angry at the time. I have decided not to edit the ISIS article any more as I disagree too much with the way it has been going recently. ~ ] (]) 09:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | :Forgive me for making that post. I was angry at the time. I have decided not to edit the ISIS article any more as I disagree too much with the way it has been going recently. ~ ] (]) 09:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| ::Don't even mention it, you're probably right anyway. The article is in some serious trouble, with a spiraling POV problem and some clear ] issues, all of which is creating a battle ground mentality. It's practically a ad-hoc propaganda ] at this point. I don't blame you one bit for taking a sanity break. There are quite a few issues I'd like to address there but the amount of time and stress it would take out of me makes me doubt it's worth the agony. There is other content I want to work on and I've promised myself I wouldn;t get sucked into things like the ISIS article until I've finished that work. Stay chill and happy editing. ] (]) 13:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | ::Don't even mention it, you're probably right anyway. The article is in some serious trouble, with a spiraling POV problem and some clear ] issues, all of which is creating a battle ground mentality. It's practically a ad-hoc propaganda ] at this point. I don't blame you one bit for taking a sanity break. There are quite a few issues I'd like to address there but the amount of time and stress it would take out of me makes me doubt it's worth the agony. There is other content I want to work on and I've promised myself I wouldn;t get sucked into things like the ISIS article until I've finished that work. Stay chill and happy editing. ] (]) 13:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC) | ||
| :::I will probably be crucified for posting this message, but I have been taken to AN/I by Gregkaye at ] and think you ought to know that you have been mentioned in it, as Exhibit 6 for the prosecution (!) on a charge, among other things, of my canvassing for editorial support (!). Absolutely no comment. This is just a courtesy note and is not an invitation to comment in the AN/I (sorry about that disclaimer but I have to tread carefully). :( ~ ] (]) 00:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 00:21, 28 December 2014
Your comment on the Lead in ISIS
Please do not take my comment there wrong; it was not directed at you. Editors have been arguing at great length about the Lead for months and months and still they cannot decide on a final version. The wording of the first para gets re-edited and reverted almost every other day as "Revision history" will show. This instability is ludicrous, IMO. I hope you can knock some sense into them. Good luck; you will need it. P-123 (talk) 11:36, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
- Forgive me for making that post. I was angry at the time. I have decided not to edit the ISIS article any more as I disagree too much with the way it has been going recently. ~ P-123 (talk) 09:55, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- Don't even mention it, you're probably right anyway. The article is in some serious trouble, with a spiraling POV problem and some clear ownership issues, all of which is creating a battle ground mentality. It's practically a ad-hoc propaganda soapbox at this point. I don't blame you one bit for taking a sanity break. There are quite a few issues I'd like to address there but the amount of time and stress it would take out of me makes me doubt it's worth the agony. There is other content I want to work on and I've promised myself I wouldn;t get sucked into things like the ISIS article until I've finished that work. Stay chill and happy editing. GraniteSand (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC)
- I will probably be crucified for posting this message, but I have been taken to AN/I by Gregkaye at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents and think you ought to know that you have been mentioned in it, as Exhibit 6 for the prosecution (!) on a charge, among other things, of my canvassing for editorial support (!). Absolutely no comment. This is just a courtesy note and is not an invitation to comment in the AN/I (sorry about that disclaimer but I have to tread carefully). :( ~ P-123 (talk) 00:18, 28 December 2014 (UTC)
- Don't even mention it, you're probably right anyway. The article is in some serious trouble, with a spiraling POV problem and some clear ownership issues, all of which is creating a battle ground mentality. It's practically a ad-hoc propaganda soapbox at this point. I don't blame you one bit for taking a sanity break. There are quite a few issues I'd like to address there but the amount of time and stress it would take out of me makes me doubt it's worth the agony. There is other content I want to work on and I've promised myself I wouldn;t get sucked into things like the ISIS article until I've finished that work. Stay chill and happy editing. GraniteSand (talk) 13:50, 24 December 2014 (UTC)