Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion/Log/2015 February 1: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Templates for discussion | Log Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 17:36, 2 February 2015 editCaliburn (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Rollbackers5,586 edits →Template:Age in years, months, weeks, days and hours: :/← Previous edit		Revision as of 22:49, 2 February 2015 edit undoDirtlawyer1 (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers88,853 edits →Template:Infobox sport event: conditional support for mergeNext edit →
Line 20:		Line 20:
	Very similar templates. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 22:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)		Very similar templates. <span class="vcard"><span class="fn">]</span> (<span class="nickname">Pigsonthewing</span>); ]; ]</span> 22:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
	*'''Delete''' ] -- this template is built with HTML table entities ; replace all instances with template infobox sport event, which uses template:infobox -- ] (]) 03:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' ] -- this template is built with HTML table entities ; replace all instances with template infobox sport event, which uses template:infobox -- ] (]) 03:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
			*'''Comment''' - {{Ping\|Pigsonthewing}} Andy, I am inclined to support your proposed merge because it appears that we have two small templates that are performing nearly the same set of functions which can be easily combined into a concise survivor with few, if any issues. That having been said, I have two requests before moving to "support/merge":
			::1. Can you please notify the creator of the second template, User:Arsennik, that this TfD is pending; and
			::2. Can you please provide a list of the identified parameters for proposed surviving template?
			:Thank you. ] (]) 22:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

	==== ] ====		==== ] ====

Revision as of 22:49, 2 February 2015

< January 31	February 2 >

February 1

Template:Infobox sport event

Template:Infobox sport event (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (130 transclusions)

Template:Infobox championship event (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages) (59 transclusions)

Propose merging Template:Infobox sport event with Template:Infobox championship event.
Very similar templates. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 22:02, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete template:Infobox championship event -- this template is built with HTML table entities ; replace all instances with template infobox sport event, which uses template:infobox -- 65.94.40.137 (talk) 03:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Comment - @Pigsonthewing: Andy, I am inclined to support your proposed merge because it appears that we have two small templates that are performing nearly the same set of functions which can be easily combined into a concise survivor with few, if any issues. That having been said, I have two requests before moving to "support/merge":

1. Can you please notify the creator of the second template, User:Arsennik, that this TfD is pending; and

2. Can you please provide a list of the identified parameters for proposed surviving template?

Thank you. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 22:49, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Virginia Slims of Akron tournaments

Template:Virginia Slims of Akron tournaments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Also nominating Template:Virginia Slims of Fort Lauderdale tournaments (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Tennis templates without any entries. The tournament articles don't exist. ...William 21:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Keep – Templates now have an entry.--Wolbo (talk) 23:08, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete - Navboxes exist to navigate between linked articles on related subjects. A good rule of thumb is whether the navbox includes a minimum of five links to existing articles on related subjects. This navboxes includes one year-specific tournament, and one non-year-specific parent article, and three red links for non-existent year-specific tournament articles. That is not enough to justify this navbox's existence. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:37, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Userfy until the articles are created. (I'll take them if nobody else requests them, and would then speedy delete them if we don't turn all the years blue soon, as they can be undeleted/recreated later, if needed. If someone else wants them, though, I won't complain.) 4 blue-linked years are enough for these navboxes, in my opinion. —PC-XT+ 10:57, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- Comment - PC-XT, I know this is TfD and not AfD, but given the extremely brief character of these articles, I would think a better alternative would be to merge the four years into the parent article, thereby creating a complete history and list of the four years this tournament existed. Something for Wolbo and WikiProject Tennis to consider. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 13:35, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
  - Yes, we would need to look the articles and their sources over, and determine what to do. If merged, we obviously wouldn't turn the years blue any time soon, resulting in a change of my !vote if this is still open, or speedy deletion if it was userfied in my space in the meantime. I'll start a topic on WT:TENNIS. —PC-XT+ 17:16, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Toho character

Template:Infobox Toho character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:16, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Nashville Star 6

Template:Nashville Star 6 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. No other season has a template. Most of the bluelinks are unrelated people, and most of the redlinks will never have a chance, especially given that one first-placer from a previous season doesn't even have an article. Ten Pound Hammer • 18:36, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Adelaide Bite roster 2010-11

Template:Adelaide Bite roster 2010-11 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Brisbane Bandits roster 2010-11 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Canberra Cavalry roster 2010-11 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Melbourne Aces roster 2010-11 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Perth Heat roster 2010-11 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Sydney Blue Sox roster 2010-11 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

old rosters merged with 2010–11 Australian Baseball League team rosters. Frietjes (talk) 19:30, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

@Frietjes: Could you please explain in some greater detail (a) what you have done so far with these templates, and (b) what you propose to do as a result of this TfD discussion. Neither is clear from your brief statement above. Thanks. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 05:27, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete if these were single-use templates, as it appears —PC-XT+ 11:01, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete all as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Delete per nom. Redundant, unused and out of date. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 17:44, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
Delete all as redundant. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 12:10, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Template:Age in years, months, weeks, days and hours

Template:Age in years, months, weeks, days and hours (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not used, and probablty will never be. The nature of this template is needlessly specific, and I think the other Age calculation templates will suffice. George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 13:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

It is very relevant and useful for spacecraft etas where there is a countdown to the second. I think code was embedded into other templates at some point in which case this template should be marked as deprecated rather than deleted. I would have preferred seeing this rather than a nomination. -- A Certain White Cat 10:08, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps deprecate for now per A Certain White Cat, as I don't expect there is much use for it, now, but I am currently unsure. —PC-XT+ 11:12, 2 February 2015 (UTC)
- I too, am unsure now. I'll wait to see what others say. George Edward C – Talk – Contributions 17:36, 2 February 2015 (UTC)