Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
{{Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds}}
{{Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds}}
== Peacock language ==
{{u|Tomica}} has repeatedly reverted the change from "rave" to "positive" when discussing critics' reviews of the song. Although this word is cited in the article body with , it means the same thing as "positive" – defines it, when used as an adjective, as "extravagantly flattering or enthusiastic". ] - which cites similar words such as "acclaimed" - as words that "promote the subject of an article, while neither imparting nor plainly summarizing verifiable information". {{u|Gloss}} agreed with me on this but was also reverted by Tomica. Seeking other users' opinions. –''''']''''' (] / ]) 20:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
Revision as of 20:46, 9 February 2015
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the FourFiveSeconds article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rihanna, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rihanna on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.RihannaWikipedia:WikiProject RihannaTemplate:WikiProject RihannaRihanna
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong
Tomica has repeatedly reverted the change from "rave" to "positive" when discussing critics' reviews of the song. Although this word is cited in the article body with this source, it means the same thing as "positive" – Dictionary.com defines it, when used as an adjective, as "extravagantly flattering or enthusiastic". WP:PEACOCK - which cites similar words such as "acclaimed" - as words that "promote the subject of an article, while neither imparting nor plainly summarizing verifiable information". Gloss agreed with me on this but was also reverted by Tomica. Seeking other users' opinions. –Chase (talk / contribs) 20:46, 9 February 2015 (UTC)
