| Revision as of 06:01, 24 March 2015 editLowercase sigmabot III (talk | contribs)Bots, Template editors2,307,006 editsm Archiving 1 discussion(s) to User talk:Timotheus Canens/Archives/2015/3) (bot← Previous edit | Revision as of 09:36, 24 March 2015 edit undoGerda Arendt (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers382,532 edits →Bach: Not the article writers but the readers should decide.Next edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| I don't like to look back, but Bach's birthday reminded me of my birthday present for him two years ago. I told you above that I wrote a GA on his composition. I have written all GAs (not counted) and FAs (2 so far) related to Bach. Once a constructive discussion on ] resulted in an {{diff|Robert Stoepel|541984203|536566782|infobox on 4 March 2013}}, I felt that it was time for Bach as well. I found the discussion less constructive, and I miss ] since. - Now I was tempted to suggest a short infobox for Bach (as ] has one) but instead dedicated my ] to the victims of the infobox wars and translated an ] to German, - you may have ] that I translate articles of the missed. I would like the wars to end. What can we do? - I normally love my restriction, - it saves me much time to walk away after ]. Others should do the same, - I ] to defend a user who has no idea what he stepped into (and myself), my name being mentioned 9 times so far. --] (]) 08:21, 23 March 2015 (UTC) | I don't like to look back, but Bach's birthday reminded me of my birthday present for him two years ago. I told you above that I wrote a GA on his composition. I have written all GAs (not counted) and FAs (2 so far) related to Bach. Once a constructive discussion on ] resulted in an {{diff|Robert Stoepel|541984203|536566782|infobox on 4 March 2013}}, I felt that it was time for Bach as well. I found the discussion less constructive, and I miss ] since. - Now I was tempted to suggest a short infobox for Bach (as ] has one) but instead dedicated my ] to the victims of the infobox wars and translated an ] to German, - you may have ] that I translate articles of the missed. I would like the wars to end. What can we do? - I normally love my restriction, - it saves me much time to walk away after ]. Others should do the same, - I ] to defend a user who has no idea what he stepped into (and myself), my name being mentioned 9 times so far. --] (]) 08:21, 23 March 2015 (UTC) | ||
| I can't help smiling looking at ]: I am threatened with sanctions because of a third comment, while others revert an infobox without a comment, twice in two days, and edit war over the request not to edit war, mentioning consensus where there is obviously no consensus. {{diff|Laurence Olivier|653218449|653217652|This edit}} made my day. ] at his best. Is this what the arbitrators had in mind with their decision? - My idea: not the article writers but the readers should decide. --] (]) 09:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC) | |||
| == Old SPI case == | == Old SPI case == | ||
Revision as of 09:36, 24 March 2015
Please click here to leave me a new message.
| AfC submissions Random submission |
| 2+ months |
| 1,749 pending submissionsPurge to update |
Notes
| PGP key |
|---|
-----BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- Version: GnuPG/MacGPG2 v2.0.18 (Darwin) mQENBFDdJN0BCADjDFGKV41olt0YbRaxABn319KM8idSEt5KGMI5S7R1te5zlf24 QpHbMKJm46M1ZlvRsOtD7PRUOVXFSYE4jm7THfGJcqXjkdu7k6nbZxuKe3LDJdQv 9bc0zbUFO+gusmBR6xZMM2l0e23mRXKroB6KfawGq6o4OBPhqjx8u9TkxpwlIhCs aMe97XGQOoPf7h20K+vlekItzyx87/U7oIsKGBwSF4tHak/EjVu3hFbRcny9nUej nx1cBXm5X6yzWSybraujrglwISIog21evh1Jrw+i/xtYa6ZYqDKHPMp1+dHjPlNV AudIcjq97iiq6kYPtHcgzKMORB4T+R5gQXNhABEBAAG0MFRpbW90aGV1cyBDYW5l bnMgPHRpbW90aGV1cy5jYW5lbnMud3BAZ21haWwuY29tPokBOQQTAQIAIwUCUN0k 3QIbLwcLCQgHAwIBBhUIAgkKCwQWAgMBAh4BAheAAAoJEPoukYdWZeaKTZsH/jt3 W+xFPXlavHwA4kain3SXH9wrYCFHpnCCySWN3eN3BGaRf/TxwVsAxZocZ1P0U2H4 Il75FZ4TscdeqOha8ESbc79NAP/oTjRzqJNV/1ljsdHsaRSkc1Tfu4iTwWC3I2Hb Wj0FtLs08YdE94DhJGmSyZWb7p6nSTr22O0nH4dT4sM7HO/LsnDj44q2uSu2R950 VfP5S3XVOoijR5TP7QhkLZDTdb8b6HqRaWSoIsK70XBKk/voTAZe2bOCqrlUK59H O7tyHyoPK1Jcz2QmkFOmK/U5ot5m0S/GvhWvTLLmcAPIJO9/SqsJY8mX6ax09XxE QjAehIm5tOW00ukfkyu5AQ0EUN0k3QEIAOtGhpLp4zwGN0ZuSfA2TfDKq7qZB/Mp L9ZBzepRpKIPj4pcLdJNwQgYmb2XxElLWwOwsanN61yFZ2P3CUF89I5RgmzkyrSK nD4qgvMCKthLPI3FEnaXL+LR9br7VCeoYfjQdGrSsxOFtdfUQ0SsJCUvLduBblaA mEwOCarpG6cegl4Tbq0Fqg2lw8MZAQc7/nrZvpCkIk9ZYMYGFUaGW875xbCUt0T8 df6WG7KSWRrS2jy/2rgUmDNiyHI4LOUe5+8C6w0eOOLumKwdD3tXMtbuFNFluYzK 2nVIHrc3D2WmUnPd/ESed3ms4YCuGEGiybcKtyCILVhBOv2LGPLgKAsAEQEAAYkC PgQYAQIACQUCUN0k3QIbLgEpCRD6LpGHVmXmisBdIAQZAQIABgUCUN0k3QAKCRCU 2R0REJq2jqcNCADHnXpwpgbwGV+pd4tU05yHqMwIbyvXFlO/ScY9vKgtPlAU3Go+ wM3pEXeBUftCYzHraYOigc3GeZAM7QbQqyUMzWjrNDPb5/LWCiEvKoJu223+x432 E1kCmRqC8WEBj+Dz5dHUUd3EOfoE3pOjw+EXdgyMsj6HwxeygocTZvkcur9yLZhh mXYehcJVJXvjZDNdFnCv7lnXTM8McccsAOQj3uwVONabk92aQ8dZq7GXS0F2BE2t APz5NJ3Rz7jjnqI9YjTkuSKuNZGMeeQVuF7ae0ee97qZ4lVDHgR2ZlfxRzzO2kYp tIMv2QG0MB5cRLXKluJAIQ13qqAXqF/Aolc9vj4IAJY0PXpMKmsYheWGwuf3LYMb mT1C2zXal1t1A+p0KpMk7phQLSfjgHVUFzNIg245tQpHR9AORRGARggpjcfRJVb0 RZzYPvHFDZx+W+lannAKVCSEjlOywf6HOk4Wf80llpXyf6ahAUqypvOzOVV0y9QV myOQP36XL7IA7f1Eet/sgRMWQsQNxXCPGyv34/BOUiE8V5NBaYUMw9XYy6OOTfA7 /L5xAA5WPbBQe4KgfoCF/QWxJGbINtOf/guw3CKlRebqWdzmzADviIoCT6OImcrM RJHS+H7wL/fXRWGP9wOsqWclTtrP0QWRPEJpNK8RhWcYEOkIE0at8WzKSMtvfBc= =oCnW -----END PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK----- |
Bach
As you probably know I received the advice to contact you. Bach's birthday seems a good day to start a conversation, with Wir danken dir, Gott, wir danken dir, BWV 29, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:52, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Gerda Arendt: You'd need to be more specific. T. Canens (talk) 14:57, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- I will but not on Sunday, church on Sunday, with 15th-century insight on justice (a work in progress), --Gerda Arendt (talk) 15:19, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't like to look back, but Bach's birthday reminded me of my birthday present for him two years ago. I told you above that I wrote a GA on his composition. I have written all GAs (not counted) and FAs (2 so far) related to Bach. Once a constructive discussion on Robert Stoepel resulted in an infobox on 4 March 2013, I felt that it was time for Bach as well. I found the discussion less constructive, and I miss GFHandel since. - Now I was tempted to suggest a short infobox for Bach (as Handel has one) but instead dedicated my latest GA to the victims of the infobox wars and translated an article by GFHandel to German, - you may have read in the Signpost that I translate articles of the missed. I would like the wars to end. What can we do? - I normally love my restriction, - it saves me much time to walk away after two comments. Others should do the same, - I can't return to defend a user who has no idea what he stepped into (and myself), my name being mentioned 9 times so far. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:21, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
I can't help smiling looking at Laurence Olivier: I am threatened with sanctions because of a third comment, while others revert an infobox without a comment, twice in two days, and edit war over the request not to edit war, mentioning consensus where there is obviously no consensus. This edit made my day. Kafka at his best. Is this what the arbitrators had in mind with their decision? - My idea: not the article writers but the readers should decide. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:36, 24 March 2015 (UTC)
Old SPI case
5 years ago, you ceremoniously banned me, without so much as my feedback.. at the behest of a now-disgraced Wiki user who claimed I was a "sock puppet". As a result I essentially all but gave up helping Wiki because of the bite.
I have been asked by my research company if I would like to add new information regarding graphine oxide doping and manufacturing processes at the Misplaced Pages and want my good name reinstated so I may do this.
I am still quite upset that a troll can misuse your goodwill to protect himself while prosecuting his numerous edit wars.
Please keep in mind, per your prior comments.. what "looks like a duck" is not always a duck.
Weissman129 (talk) 02:23, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
- @Weissman129: You were blocked for a week, not banned; and I wasn't the one who blocked you either. However, if you make edits like this while logged out, it's rather easy to make others think you are socking. T. Canens (talk) 15:03, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Well now that I can sign in I'll be sure to go fix that and sign it thank you! Now back to the point.. when will this be removed? You had input into it at the time don't back track now. Weissman129 (talk) 03:03, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Remove what? The SPI case? Are you claiming that the IPs in that case are not you or that they are you but you don't think you did anything wrong? T. Canens (talk) 03:06, 23 March 2015 (UTC)