Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:15, 14 April 2015

Template:NoBracketBot

Hi.

Please use the + New section tab above to start a new message and remember to Sign Your Post by typing four tildes.

Thanks for stopping by.

—Kirt

List of Devil Survivor 2: The Animation chapters

Just wanted to let you know that I didn't believe that deleting List of Devil Survivor 2: The Animation chapters is uncontroversial, so I removed the CSD tag you placed there. However, I also retargeted the redirect to the section you referenced in the speedy deletion tag: Devil Survivor 2: The Animation#Manga adaptation, considering that I agree that would be the best target for this redirect. Steel1943 (talk) 03:11, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

I still say it should be deleted. Other than the influx of recent visits, there was only about 7 views in the last 90 days therefore no one goes to that particular page (redirect or otherwise). The Manga section will not get any larger since its publication ended and there is no reason for yet another spin-off article from an article already spun-off from its related video game counterpart. For these reasons, I feel my deletion proposal was valid. —KirtZ 01:08, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Cross Ange

Hi KirtZJ this is RatedHook. In regard to the message you sent me as for Cross Ange the anime I kinda of don't understand as to what you mean I need a reliable source for it. Currently I have watched the anime all over Crunchyroll and have seen every aspect of it to say from my opinion that it includes the following three: Mecha, Action, and Romance. I will add again in the action and romance but if you feel I am wrong please fill free to message me. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RatedHook (talk • contribs) 00:38, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Simply watching a series and inferring your own assumptions constitutes to original research and is not acceptable on Misplaced Pages. I suggest reading this page to learn about citations. At any rate, do not discuss genre changes to Cross Ange on my talk page. Instead do at Talk:Cross Ange. —KirtZ 00:55, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

So in order to add the genre changes we need to cite the following two if we want to add it. Got it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RatedHook (talk • contribs) 01:37, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

No Game No Life Reversion

Just want to ask a question about the Reversion of my edit on the No Game No Life page.

Besides the fact that it's a GAN, was there any other reason for not having No Game No Life conform to the other anime pages layouts? --Sprchr (talk) 00:09, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

I reverted on good faith. I don't believe there was any strict ruling on how A&M pages should be laid out. GAN and above tend to get better layouts than other pages though. Feel free to inquire over here if you want. —KirtZ 00:24, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

There is a layout for Anime and Manga related pages, however you are right that there is no strict ruling, although, in my personal opinion, it would be better for the article to conform a little bit more then it currently is (and yes, I know my opinion does not take priority in this situation) --Sprchr (talk) 00:32, 6 February 2015 (UTC)

Pokemon Season 18

No it's okay you got it right. It did come back for a new season. I know it's the same but you got it right. So you can you put it for Season 18.--Funnycoolman (talk) 15:11, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

Fixed. My main concern is the title of the articles should they be actually split. —KirtZ 15:21, 7 February 2015 (UTC)

I replied to you on Cychoidbomb's page where to replied to me about my "mess" (how silly of you to say that) and I don't know if you'll go back and get it so I'm going to reply it here as well on your page as I assume you check this thing a lot. No need to start a new section about Pokémon Season 18 so I'll post it in this section. Anyway, excuse me but what I did was nothing more of a mess than what you're doing. How dare you criticize me and then not even read any of the discussion that should have you think otherwise on this with how you're all "too long didn't read" remark. You're being silly here. If anything what I did was a good faith edit and you should be very proud of me I came up with the proper solution for this thing. Like I told your friend Cyberpower on his page, perhaps I should have started a discussion but I didn't think to do one. I saw there was a problem with how this was to be handled and I immediately jumped in to solve it in perhaps the best way possible. Both seasons have the same title and the fact that they're different seasons show they should have separate pages. You can't get a "Season 18" table by itself on the main page if it's on the same page as Season 17. I was only trying to be helpful and did was perhaps the best idea to handle this two by having a Season 1 and 2 label of XY and you just bring me down and spit at me. Shame. - Jabrona (talk) 01:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

All I can say is that I'm sorry that's how you feel. No harm was meant. I explained your error on the XY talk page. The titular naming scheme was wrong. —KirtZ 12:20, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Brackets and actors

I originally removed the brackets and actor names, since few other film articles didn't have them either. I was somewhat confused. But what about the article of the second Persona 3 film? Should the brackets and actor be written there as well? This time I don't act before asking advice from someone. CAJH (talk) 19:44, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

They should be included as plaintext only. —KirtZ 20:04, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

The word "plaintext" is little hard to understand. I don't really know how it is explained in my mother language which isn't English. CAJH (talk) 09:51, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

Perhaps that was a bad word choice. I meant you can include the VA's in normal text without wikilinks, like P3M1. —KirtZ 14:12, 24 February 2015 (UTC)

March 2015

Hi ummm, I am Chezzelsl and I would like to ask if my information is wrong? And why you would delete all of my add ons? I feel kind of frustrated as I spent 1 hour doing Tonari No Kaibutsu Kun add on and Ao Haru Ride add ons. If there is a problem please say it to me... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chezzelsl (talk • contribs) 03:43, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Sorry but the majority of the content you included was related to each character's relationship status and is not important enough to be mentioned. Things like these are generally not added and removed from character descriptions since they can constitute to original research which is frowned upon. Feel free to add general information but I think most of them are complete enough. —KirtZ 08:09, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

World Trigger edit reversion

Hey, just want a little clarification on the World Trigger edit reversion. Since "mainstream" TV show pages count aired episodes only, even if the full season episode count is known (Better Call Saul, Marvel's Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D.), I was wondering why this doesn't seem to apply for anime. Any insight would be helpful. Bcdefg123 (talk) 15:18, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

As far as I've seen, articles falling under the scope of the anime and manga project have the total count listed where available. —KirtZ 20:06, 2 March 2015 (UTC)

"minor fix"

Could you please be more descriptive of the change you're making? "Minor fix" looks like you're vandalizing (which I have verified multiple times now that you aren't). The correct way to indicate a minor fix is to use the checkbox in the save screen, which you seem to know how to do. --Izno (talk) 03:24, 6 March 2015 (UTC)

MVM

Hi, one supposes that if MVM Entertainment shouldn't have a release list (looks too much like advertising), then neither should Anime Limited, and would then at least make Anime Limited entry consistent with MVM and Manga Entertainment ? EzraJones (talk) 14:32, 11 March 2015 (UTC)

Done. These pages should have prose that describe the companies, not a huge list of what they distribute. You can find those on their websites. —KirtZ 09:36, 12 March 2015 (UTC)

Pokémon: XY episodes (part 2)

I corrected the Japan premiere date to November 6, 2014 in the sentence, "The season premiered in Japan on November 6, 2014 on TV Tokyo" to match the Japan release date for the episode, "Pokémon: Mega Evolution Special II" and where it states the original run, "November 6, 2014 - ongoing." I also corrected the Japan episode number to 864 for the episode titled "Protect the Future of Science! The Labyrinth of Electricity!!" Before I corrected the Japan episode number to 864 for this episode, it was listed as Japan episode number 865. This does not make sense to me because the previous Japan episode number is listed as 863. Japan episode number 863 is for the episode "Battle in the Wilderness! Fight Numera!!" If this previous Japan episode number 863 is correct then which Pokemon episode is Japan episode number 864? I also corrected the Japan episode numbers for the Pokemon episodes that came after "Protect the Future of Science! The Labyrinth of Electricity!!" Pokemon episode "A Fork in the Road of Indecisiveness!? Musashi and Sonansu!!" is Japan episode number 865. Pokemon episode "Fokko VS Mahoxy! A Splendid Performance Battle!! is 866. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bchu3wiki (talk • contribs) 15:54, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

I saw the typos. Sorry. —KirtZ 15:57, 14 March 2015 (UTC)

OreGairu

Hi, KirtZJ. I changed your edit, so could you please check on List of My Teen Romantic Comedy SNAFU episodes (season 2)? If you do so, I'll say it is hard to find words to express my gratitude. --Infinite0694 (talk) 09:41, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

@Infinite0694 Sorry for the late reply. Nice work on the start. I'll get to the page once I finish cleaning up S1. Could you please provide me with the source for the episode titles? Thanks. —KirtZ 18:37, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Oops, I forgot to add the reference. According to Megami Magazine vol.180(issued on mar 30, 2015), it can be confirmed.--Infinite0694 (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Okay. From my experience though, in some cases episode titles published in magazine form before they air can be subjected to change. —KirtZ 19:14, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

An opinion

Do you have an opinion about Doorknob747 recent edits? After seeing I gave a 3RR warning but it is bothering me that the user is using an IP to edit war. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 00:10, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

@Knowledgekid87 That is clearly disruptive behavior and since the IP belongs to the user in question then I would consider that a direct violation of 3RR in being an obvious attempt to game the system. I must say that after merely observing, I am a bit disappointed in how this user has conducted themselves, this includes some of the content they have included in articles. Some users on the project have tried to help this user during their multiple posts on WT:A&M and I have seen no effort on their part to take any of the advice that has been offered. At the same time, the proposal that Doorknob has been trying to advertise on their recent edit war is clearly spam. Misplaced Pages already has a bunch of tools that new users can use to help them create articles, which I don't believe they have found. If this keeps up I would suggest seeking administrator advice at an appropriate talk page because this kind of disruption really can't continue. —Kirt 02:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)

I agree with you and will do. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:15, 14 April 2015 (UTC)