| Revision as of 23:21, 30 January 2015 editKudzu1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users20,881 edits Warning: Disruptive editing on Sevastopol. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:52, 19 April 2015 edit undoToddy1 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers48,776 edits April 2015 - edit warring noticeNext edit → | ||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being ]. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 23:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through ]. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being ]. <!-- Template:uw-disruptive3 --> ] (]) 23:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC) | ||
| :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | :''If this is a ], and you did not make the edits, consider ] for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.''<!-- Template:Shared IP advice --> | ||
| ==April 2015== | |||
| ] Hello, and ]. You appear to be engaged in an ] with one or more editors according to your reverts at ]. Although repeatedly ] another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the ], and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a ] on the ]. | |||
| If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose ]. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the ], which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a ]. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-ewsoft -->--<span style="font-family:Monotype Corsiva;font-size:10pt;color:#000000">] ]</span> 18:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 18:52, 19 April 2015
December 2012
Hello, I'm James086. I noticed that you recently made an edit to Nangarhar University that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, James086 20:22, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
January 2015
Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Sevastopol. Your edits have been reverted or removed.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Misplaced Pages's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Misplaced Pages's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Kudzu1 (talk) 23:21, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
April 2015
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Crimea. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Misplaced Pages this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Misplaced Pages is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you.-- Toddy1 (talk) 18:52, 19 April 2015 (UTC)