User:Deuterium: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:58, 17 August 2006 editDeuterium (talk \| contribs)972 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit		Revision as of 00:12, 18 August 2006 edit undoDeuterium (talk \| contribs)972 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Hello, this is my user page.
	<div style="float:right;border:solid black 1px;margin:1px">		<div style="float:right;border:solid black 1px;margin:1px">
	{\| cellspacing="0" style="width:238px;background:#90EE90"		{\| cellspacing="0" style="width:238px;background:#90EE90"
Line 5:		Line 4:
	\| style="font-size:8pt;padding:4pt;line-height:1.25em" \| This user is against <b>admins ignoring ]</b>.		\| style="font-size:8pt;padding:4pt;line-height:1.25em" \| This user is against <b>admins ignoring ]</b>.
	\|}</div>		\|}</div>

			== A 3RR VIOLATION THAT ADMINS ARE REFUSING TO DEAL WITH ==
			===] reported by User:] (Result:) ===

			] violation on {{Article\|Islamophobia}}. {{3RRV\|Netscott}}: <!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			* Previous version reverted to:
			<!-- If you cannot fill this in, do not make a report. It absolutely must be included, either here or separately for each revert. -->

			* 1st revert:
			* 2nd revert:
			* 3rd revert:
			* 4th revert:
			<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->
			* 5th revert:

			Time report made: 23:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

			'''Comments:''' The reversions are slightly different to evade 3RR and game the system, but they all amount to inserting OR tags or commenting out a widely accepted section, which is absolutely against the consensus on the talk page and have all been reverted by many other people. This is a long-time user with many archives of his talk page, not a new user or anon, so I assumed a warning was unnecessary. ] 11:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

			<nowiki>===] reported by User:] (Result:) ===

			] violation on {{Article\|Islamophobia}}. {{3RRV\|Netscott}}: <!-- USE UNDERSCORE INSTEAD OF SPACE! -->

			* Previous version reverted to:
			<!-- If you cannot fill this in, do not make a report. It absolutely must be included, either here or separately for each revert. -->

			* 1st revert:
			* 2nd revert:
			* 3rd revert:
			* 4th revert:
			<!-- These MUST be DIFFS, not OLDIDs. Look up Help:Diff if you do not know what a diff is. -->
			* 5th revert:

			Time report made: 23:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

			'''Comments:''' The reversions are slightly different to evade 3RR and game the system, but they all amount to inserting OR tags or commenting out a widely accepted section, which is absolutely against the consensus on the talk page and have all been reverted by many other people. This is a long-time user with many archives of his talk page, not a new user or anon, so I assumed a warning was unnecessary. ] 11:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)</nowiki>

	Interesting stuff		Interesting stuff

Revision as of 00:12, 18 August 2006

This user is against admins ignoring policy.

A 3RR VIOLATION THAT ADMINS ARE REFUSING TO DEAL WITH

User:Netscott reported by User:Deuterium (Result:)

Previous version reverted to: 00:34, 15 August 2006

Time report made: 23:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC)

Comments: The reversions are slightly different to evade 3RR and game the system, but they all amount to inserting OR tags or commenting out a widely accepted section, which is absolutely against the consensus on the talk page and have all been reverted by many other people. This is a long-time user with many archives of his talk page, not a new user or anon, so I assumed a warning was unnecessary. Deuterium 11:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

===] reported by User:] (Result:) === ] violation on {{Article|Islamophobia}}. {{3RRV|Netscott}}:  * Previous version reverted to:  * 1st revert: * 2nd revert: * 3rd revert: * 4th revert:  * 5th revert: Time report made: 23:22, 17 August 2006 (UTC) '''Comments:''' The reversions are slightly different to evade 3RR and game the system, but they all amount to inserting OR tags or commenting out a widely accepted section, which is absolutely against the consensus on the talk page and have all been reverted by many other people. This is a long-time user with many archives of his talk page, not a new user or anon, so I assumed a warning was unnecessary. ] 11:47, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Interesting stuff

Israeli apartheid arbitration request

Useful stuff

Misplaced Pages:Template messages/Sources of articles/Citation quick reference

Pages and information that needs to be protected from marauding POV warriors

Foreign relations of Israel‎‎ : ==South Africa== Controversially, Israel developed a relationship with ] during the 1970s and 80s. The countries traded arms and nuclear technology<ref>{{cite web |url=http://www.fas.org/nuke/guide/rsa/nuke/ |title=RSA Nuclear Weapons Program |publisher=]}}</ref> <ref>{{cite news |title=South Africa and the affordable bomb |publisher=] |date=] |url=http://www.thebulletin.org/article.php?art_ofn=ja94albright}}</ref>. The ] has been claimed to have been a joint Israeli-South African weapons test. It is claimed by ] that Israeli military officers served as consultants to the South African army in ]. <ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.guardian.co.uk/israel/Story/0,,1704037,00.html |title=Brothers in arms - Israel's secret pact with Pretoria |date=] |author=] |publisher=]}}</ref> Former ANC leader ] visited Israel in 1999. To explain his visit, Mandela said "To the many people who have questioned why I came, I say: Israel worked very closely with the apartheid regime. I say: I've made peace with many men who slaughtered our people like animals. Israel cooperated with the apartheid regime, but it did not participate in any atrocities". <ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.jewishsf.com/content/2-0-/module/displaystory/story_id/12309/edition_id/237/format/html/displaystory.html |title=Mandela bears message of peace in first visit to Israel |publisher=] |author=Belling, Susan |date=]}}</ref>

Inayat Bunglawala

Human Shield - the Israel section needs to be protected, and the Palestine section is a joke.

Israel and weapons of mass destruction - Biological weapons. In November 1998, the ] reported that Israel was attempting to build an "ethno-bomb" containing a biological agent that could specifically target genetic traits present amongst Arab populations<ref>{{cite news|title=Israel planning 'ethnic' bomb as Saddam caves in.|coauthors=Mahanaima, Uzi and Colvin, Marie|publisher=]|date=1998-11-15|accessdate=2006-07-11}}</ref>. ] also reported the story<ref>{{cite news |title=Israel's Ethnic Weapon? |publisher=] |url=http://www.wired.com/news/politics/0,1283,16272,00.html |date=]}}</ref>, as did ]. Expert reaction to the reports was highly skeptical towards the scientific plausibility of such a biological agent. <ref>{{cite news|url=http://www.salon.com/news/1998/12/02news2.html|title=Debunking the "ethno-bomb"|date=1998-12-02|accessdate=2006-07-11|publisher=]}}</ref>. ], describing the claims as "blood libel", reported that the likely source for the story was a work of science fiction by Israeli academic Doron Stanitsky. Stanitsky had sent his completely fictional work about such a weapon to Israeli newspapers two years before. The article also noted the views of genetic researchers who claimed the idea as "wholly fantastical" <ref>{{cite news|title=Now Playing: A Blood Libel For The 21st Century|publisher=]|date=1998-11-22|accessdate=2006-07-12}}</ref>

Human rights in Israel:Another Israeli citizen, ] considered a ] by Human Rights Groups and many foreign Governments was arrested and imprisoned for 18 years for revealing Israel had a clandestine program through which it had developed ] and other ].<ref name = "USDS2005" /> In its press release of ] ], ] said 'If Mordechai Vanunu were to be imprisoned for breaching the restrictions imposed on him, Amnesty International would consider him to be a prisoner of conscience' . The Israeli government still considers him a traitor.

Islamophobia:==Polls== A 2006 ] survey of American public opinion found that "many Americans harbor strong bias against U.S. Muslims". <ref>{{cite news |url=http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1002984956 |publisher=] |date=]|title= Gallup: Many Americans Harbor Strong Bias Against U.S. Muslims}}</ref> * 22% say they would not like to have a Muslim as a neighbor. * 34% believe U.S. Muslims support al-Qaeda. * 49% believe U.S. Muslims are loyal to the United States. * 39% advocate that U.S. Muslims should carry special ID

Propaganda#2006_Israel-Lebanon_conflict: Trying to allege that the photo incident was "propaganda", despite no evidence at all that it was, trying to make POV statements regarding a supposed "tide of Arab propaganda".

The Sunday Times : *Israel planning 'ethnic' bomb - in 1998, ''The Sunday Times'' reported that Israel was attempting to build an "ethno-bomb" containing a biological agent that could specifically target genetic traits present amongst Arab populations.<ref>{{cite news|title=Israel planning 'ethnic' bomb as Saddam caves in.|coauthors=Mahanaima, Uzi and Colvin, Marie|publisher=]|date=1998-11-15|accessdate=2006-07-11}}</ref>.

Chris McGreal: An attempt to make McGreal look like he has pro-Arab bias and perhaps like an unreliable source by removing the criticism from Arab organizations.