Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Just so that you are aware, I have formally filed a complaint regarding your blatant disregard for updates to the page for '']''. You and others have rejected valid updates to the page, and have failed to address complaints about spelling/grammar and even content. The page is currently in a disastrous state, with an abnormally short introduction and a terribly written synopsis section. This has been ongoing for months. This notice to you is both a courtesy and formality for your negligence.
I will continue to monitor the situation closely and pursue a shut-down of your page if the situation persists.
Revision as of 22:51, 7 March 2016
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.
This user is offline, or has forgotten to update this message since starting a wikisession.
(If there have been multiple edits from this user in the last 60 minutes and the most recent one wasn't to activate this template, it is safe to assume that this user forgot.)
Welcome to my talk here! All talks here are to be respectable, calming, and non-insulting. Past is past, and this is the present. And please correctly sign your talks with the four tildes (without the spaces) or I will not respond to your inquiry, and it will receive an automatic removal from my talk page. Also, please title your new section appropriately, as well. To make sure you do this successfully, just press the "Post new message" above (or below). Do not edit my page to add and / or remove what you feel you should. If you interrupt a discussion for your own, I will automatically delete it without a single worry — no questions or hesitations about it. All discussions are welcome here on this page, however, please, do not interrupt someone else's and I's conversation or I will remove it automatically. I won't be involved in petty arguments, I don't have the time for you if that's all you're looking for from me. Any personal insults thrown at me are automatic deletion and receive a report to an administrator or Misplaced Pages higher-power. This is to ensure my talk-page is kept clean and properly organized (slight OCD on my part). Thank you! Also, instead of a talkback, I may leave you a "ping" in our discussion, to save time and talk page space. Musicfreak7676
Due to time constraints and past incidents, I will be limiting my time and involvement on Misplaced Pages. My new start here will be different and more focused. I will focus more on myself, my friends and soap opera articles. Please follow all of my talk page rules, and I will do the same for yours. Also, I will not be forming any cliques or joining in on any arguments. My time here is strictly for bettering the pages and articles that I am choosing to edit, not to make "friends" or "enemies". Also not here for biting other editors or anything relating to personal attacks. Please remain civil at all times. Thank you!
If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Livelikemusic}} on your talk.
Thanks for this report to AIV. Good catch! I watch the X Factor etc so I'll add the user to my (rather long!) list of talk pages to watch in case they start up again.
Hi there. I initially reverted the page that Diankanika had remade because it was too short. Had I known it was copied from your sandbox, I would have reverted that as well. - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 23:35, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I saw your edit on Rita Ora's article regarding the addition of Radar Online reference. I was actually aware that this particular tabloid site is highly untrustworhy, but the reason I decided to add it is because they were the only ones who uploaded the integral copy of the complaint. Usually, The Hollywood Reporter does it, but in this case, they failed to do so. The document shows that the lawsuit actually consists of two parts, declaratory relief and breach of contract, which THR failed to mention in their exclusive (I believe they were the first to report this story). All the other media reports are mostly based on their initial article (). Considering it is RadarOnline, maybe it's best we leave it out? --Helptottt (talk) 17:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Oh, and another thing. Technically, it's not really an article, it's just uploaded content from the Supreme Court of California, a copy of the original complaint (which happens to be on their site). --Helptottt (talk) 17:09, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:SN Patch.png
⚠ Thanks for uploading File:SN Patch.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).
Hey! For the past several days, I have worked to substantially revise the page for Liz Sanbourne and I was wondering if you could possibly look it over for me to make sure that I have done everything correctly. Even though you do not identify Passions as one of your interests in the WikiProject, I was wondering if you could assess the page's development. Aoba47 (talk) 21:42, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
@Aoba47: So, I took a look, and you did a great job at expanding it, especially from where it was before you began. I meant mention you should avoid using YouTube as your sole source, especially since storyline sections do not require sourcing, as the show itself is a source on its own. I recommend looking through archives and news websites to try and find informaiton, especially about casting and character development. Also, when it ultimately comes to sourcing, you should use full-syntax with dates. Also, while it isn't necessary, US soaps more commonly put casting and character development sections before storyline ones — which generally shouldn't be split up into sub-sections of anything aside from years. But ultimately, it is up to your discretion. livelikemusictalk!02:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for your quick response. I based the structure of the page around two featured articles Sadie Harris and Pauline Fowler as I have never worked on a page about a fictional character before doing this. I wanted to copy the way episodes were cited as support for the storyline in the Sadie Harris page, but I do admit that I went overboard with everything so I will probably end up taking them out completely. I based my decision to break apart the storylines section into smaller subsections loosely around what was done on the page Pauline Fowler as I wanted to make everything accessible and easily identifiable to a first-time reader, but I can remove them if they are too much of a distraction. Thank you for call attention to the dates in the sourcing as that is probably my weakest area when editing.
Thank you again for your help! I am hoping to get this page ready for a GAN in the future (I have already requested a copy edit for it) and maybe even a feature article though I am probably being too ambitious with that last part. Aoba47 (talk) 03:24, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
@Aoba47: Anytime! When editing, if you have the option, open the "Cite" tab and under "Templates" it gives you all of the citation templates, etc. And all you do is input all of the data. Also, while it's great to take note from British soap articles and primetime dramas, American soaps are not as easily accessible or cited in the press, so they sort of have to be setup a bit differently from the rest. You've done good work thus far, like I said, just work on searching through archives and news articles for citations, so it meets the general notability guideline. A fictional character article should hold real-world context. I would recommend looking at articles like Sharon and Victoria Newman, both of which were reestablished in recent years and are great examples of quality soap articles. Also, no need to ping me on my own talkpage; I get alerts from the website automatically! livelikemusictalk!03:35, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
I had no idea that you could do that! I was trying to do all the citations manually so that makes things a lot easier for me. Thank you for giving me examples as I always find it helpful to have examples to model my work after and those two pages really let me see the formatting for American soaps as opposed to other types of shows. When I have more time, I will try my best to find more sources for the real-world context. It might take me some time as the character appeared almost ten years ago, but I am sure I can find something in the archives. Sorry about pinging you. Maybe one day, I'll actually use this site properly for once. Aoba47 (talk) 04:04, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Hello! I just wanted to let you know that I have updated the article to include the real-world context of the character, which in this case is about how the actor identifies the character as expanding the representation of African-Americans on television and the roles for African-American actors. Thank you again for your help. Aoba47 (talk) 23:29, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
What exactly did I vandalize? You always do that to me when I update the Days cast page with actual references it seems, for example, everything I recently added to the page is still there. So why always the warnings? I really can't see any thing else. If I'm missing something, then I'm sorry, but it just doesn't make any sense to me.
SJJM4EVER (talk) 08:00, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Hi! Do you know to fix this for me? I've been trying to figure it out for awhile but, charts and stuff give me a headache. Basically: the extra line. It looks like Albert and Cora had three kids but, one is invisible or something? Lol - Thanks in advance if you can! :-) Cebr1979 (talk) 01:10, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
Hey longtime no talk! I took a long break from Misplaced Pages since I was extremlely busy! But how are you? What do you think of soaps right now? Stop watching Y&R for a longtime right now. Disappointed in B&B but loving both GH and DAYS. I created a page today: Daytime Emmy Award for Outstanding Special Guest Performer in a Drama Series and I was wondering if you have any time just to check it out? To correct any grammar mistakes I may have made and maybe even include some proper english for me? If you can not do it, I understand, but if you could that would be awesome and greatly appreciated! Anyways, have a nice day!!! — JJakathestrength (talk, contribs) 22:17, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Uh oh
So, I wanted to point something out to you. After our discussion on Talk:This Is What the Truth Feels Like, I noticed something made by the IP address, 156.12.253.137; the user left this comment after reverting your edit: "This is used on every other album page. Livelikemusic is know for edit-warring, and needs to stop." I don't know about you, but this sounds like another sockpuppet of Smoore95GAGA and Katycat3567. Am I paranoid? Or just sane? Whatever the case, this IP address who hasn't edited any article since recently, really doesn't seem to like you. Lemme know your thoughts and have a good day. :) , Carbrera (talk) 00:02, 1 March 2016 (UTC).
@Carbrera: Definitely seems like the same sock, who yes, does not like me because I continue to find them out and continue to get them off this website for clearly breaking Misplaced Pages policy. Their continued personal-talk and inability to accept the website's decision against them is alarming. livelikemusictalk!02:17, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
Definitely, this is very alarming. Thankfully he/she hasn't edited anything since my message. I'm keeping my eye on the IP for now. Thanks; good to know I'm not going crazy! Carbrera (talk) 03:10, 3 March 2016 (UTC)
You removed the section abou Liam Payne's relationship with Cheryl Fernandez Versini, however, it has now been confirmed by multiple media publications and the couple themselves. Why was the information removed. I can add additional sources if the initial source from the Guardian was no sufficient.
Just so that you are aware, I have formally filed a complaint regarding your blatant disregard for updates to the page for Britney: Piece of Me. You and others have rejected valid updates to the page, and have failed to address complaints about spelling/grammar and even content. The page is currently in a disastrous state, with an abnormally short introduction and a terribly written synopsis section. This has been ongoing for months. This notice to you is both a courtesy and formality for your negligence.
I will continue to monitor the situation closely and pursue a shut-down of your page if the situation persists.
User talk:Livelikemusic: Difference between revisions
Add topic
