| Revision as of 15:28, 31 August 2016 editCJinoz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,289 edits Fix← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:11, 1 September 2016 edit undoJohnpacklambert (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers603,908 edits →Peyton BrownNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| *'''Comment''' also interested in why you think the outcome here should be any different than in December at the first nomination? I don't see anything that has changed since then and ] ] (]) 15:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' also interested in why you think the outcome here should be any different than in December at the first nomination? I don't see anything that has changed since then and ] ] (]) 15:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC) | ||
| :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 00:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)</small> | :<small class="delsort-notice">Note: This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 00:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)</small> | ||
| *'''Comment''' The reason we should not follow the December 2015 precedent was actually explained in the nomination. I have no idea why I put Georgia when I knew this was Alabama. I knew one of the papers was from Huntsville, which I know is in Alabama. However the fact is that they were articles related to the pageant. For state pageant winners we should require sources that cover the person without any regard to their winning a state pageant.] (]) 03:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 03:11, 1 September 2016
Peyton Brown
AfDs for this article:- Peyton Brown (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Brown is not notable. She is Miss Georgia USA, but this is not enough to pass notability. In the previous discussion it was claimed 5 of the articles were not related to her beauty pageant crown. Looking at the articles, it seems all are. This is at best passing, one event notability. John Pack Lambert (talk) 08:11, 26 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:06, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- a WP:PSEUDO BLP on a non-notable individual. State level pageant win is a WP:BIO1E and does not add to subject's notability. Coverage is trivial, WP:ROUTINE or local. K.e.coffman (talk) 21:07, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Redirect to Miss Alabama USA: Non-notable. { } 12:44, 28 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep state titleholder twice, has received media coverage, meets WP:GNG PageantUpdater (talk) 23:49, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment also interested in why you think the outcome here should be any different than in December at the first nomination? I don't see anything that has changed since then and notability is not temporary PageantUpdater (talk) 15:27, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Beauty Pageants-related deletion discussions. PageantUpdater (talk) 00:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The reason we should not follow the December 2015 precedent was actually explained in the nomination. I have no idea why I put Georgia when I knew this was Alabama. I knew one of the papers was from Huntsville, which I know is in Alabama. However the fact is that they were articles related to the pageant. For state pageant winners we should require sources that cover the person without any regard to their winning a state pageant.John Pack Lambert (talk) 03:11, 1 September 2016 (UTC)