Revision as of 13:46, 14 October 2016 editAbbottonian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users661 edits Notifying author of deletion nomination for James Grant Group | Revision as of 02:58, 15 October 2016 edit undoDGG (talk | contribs)316,874 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
You can leave a note on ] if you have questions. ] (]) 13:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC) | You can leave a note on ] if you have questions. ] (]) 13:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC) | ||
===Status and Advice=== | |||
:As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article. Not because there was no indication of significance, but because the page was wholly promotional, essentially a press release for the firm. ''']''' (]) 02:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:58, 15 October 2016
Speedy deletion nomination of James Grant Group
Hello Doboscake15,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged James Grant Group for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Abbottonian (talk) 13:46, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Status and Advice
- As reviewing administrator, I deleted the article. Not because there was no indication of significance, but because the page was wholly promotional, essentially a press release for the firm. DGG ( talk ) 02:58, 15 October 2016 (UTC)