Misplaced Pages

:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 03:16, 8 February 2017 view sourceCallmemirela (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers21,024 edits User:68.186.227.145 reported by User:Callmemirela (Result: Semi): reply← Previous edit Revision as of 03:24, 8 February 2017 view source EdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,233 edits User:Ktrimi991 reported by User:Anastan (Result: Blocked): ClosingNext edit →
Line 91: Line 91:
::{{AN3|b}} – 24 hours. ] (]) 20:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ::{{AN3|b}} – 24 hours. ] (]) 20:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: ) == == ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) ==


;Page: {{pagelinks|Banja, Skenderaj}} ;Page: {{pagelinks|Banja, Skenderaj}}
Line 114: Line 114:


User is again breaching 3RR in discretionary sanction area. He is already warned about this article, and reverted once more after the warning, then earlier and also {{ping|EdJohnston}} . In past 24+ hours he is on fourth, third or second revert on at least 6 articles (], ], ], ], ], etc...) Not to mention removal of sources, not waiting for any consensus or comment, POV pushing, political agenda, etc, etc and all of that in discretionary sanctions area. In short, very clearly, ]. '''<font face="Perpetua" size="3">] (])</font>''' 17:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC) User is again breaching 3RR in discretionary sanction area. He is already warned about this article, and reverted once more after the warning, then earlier and also {{ping|EdJohnston}} . In past 24+ hours he is on fourth, third or second revert on at least 6 articles (], ], ], ], ], etc...) Not to mention removal of sources, not waiting for any consensus or comment, POV pushing, political agenda, etc, etc and all of that in discretionary sanctions area. In short, very clearly, ]. '''<font face="Perpetua" size="3">] (])</font>''' 17:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
:{{AN3|b}} – 48 hours. This has overtones of ethnic warring. which removes the Serbian alternate name of the district was performed with the not-too-helpful summary "Albanian alternative names are deleted too". The text of the article makes clear that the majority of Banja's inhabitants are Serbian. He has also warred on Albanian versus Serbian names at ]. ] (]) 03:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)


== ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) == == ] reported by ] (Result: Blocked) ==

Revision as of 03:24, 8 February 2017

Noticeboards
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes.
General
Articles,
content
Page handling
User conduct
Other
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards
    Welcome to the edit warring noticeboard Shortcuts Update this page

    This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.

    You must notify any user you have reported.

    You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~ to do so.


    You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

    Additional notes
    • When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
    • The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
    • Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
    • Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.

    Definition of edit warring
    Edit warring is a behavior, typically exemplified by the use of repeated edits to "win" a content dispute. It is different from a bold, revert, discuss (BRD) cycle. Reverting vandalism and banned users is not edit warring; at the same time, content disputes, even egregious point of view edits and other good-faith changes do not constitute vandalism. Administrators often must make a judgment call to identify edit warring when cooling disputes. Administrators currently use several measures to determine if a user is edit warring.
    Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
    An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Violations of this rule normally attract blocks of at least 24 hours. Any appearance of gaming the system by reverting a fourth time just outside the 24-hour slot is likely to be treated as a 3RR violation. See here for exemptions.

    Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

    Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs.
    Click here to create a new report
    Noticeboard archives
    Administrators' (archives, search)
    349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358
    359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368
    Incidents (archives, search)
    1157 1158 1159 1160 1161 1162 1163 1164 1165 1166
    1167 1168 1169 1170 1171 1172 1173 1174 1175 1176
    Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search)
    472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481
    482 483 484 485 486 487 488 489 490 491
    Arbitration enforcement (archives)
    328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337
    338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347
    Other links

    User:Böri reported by User:EricEnfermero (Result: Blocked 24 hours)

    Page
    Palindrome (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Böri (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 07:46, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 763965848 by Meters (talk)"
    2. 07:43, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 763965481 by Meters (talk)"
    3. 07:37, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 763961146 by EricEnfermero (talk)"
    4. 06:21, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "/* Sentences and phrases */ Palindrome is just: "Was it a cat I saw?" / YOU'RE WRITING MEANINGLESS THINGS!"
    5. 11:05, 5 February 2017 (UTC) "/* Sentences and phrases */"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 07:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Palindrome. (TW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


    Comments:

    User:Meters also reached out to the user on the user's talk page; you can see Böri's aggressive response on the page. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:52, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

    I started a thread on the article's talk page after the fact at Talk:Palindrome#cat_example. Note that Böri also made the identical edit three times in December and was warned for edit warring then also Meters (talk) 08:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

    Thanks for doing that. I thought that there was a recent talk page thread on the issue, but I was incorrect. EricEnfermero (Talk) 08:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

    User:Kunwar shailendra singh rathore reported by User:Chrissymad (Result: Blocked)

    Page
    Dongargaon ek jannat (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Kunwar shailendra singh rathore (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 19:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
    2. 19:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
    3. 19:14, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
    4. Consecutive edits made from 15:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC) to 18:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
      1. 15:57, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "this is wrong"
      2. 15:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      3. 15:59, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      4. 16:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      5. 16:25, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      6. 17:06, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      7. 17:07, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      8. 17:09, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      9. 17:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      10. 17:15, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      11. 17:18, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      12. 17:22, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      13. 17:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      14. 17:27, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      15. 18:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      16. 18:10, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      17. 18:16, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      18. 18:40, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
      19. 18:58, 6 February 2017 (UTC) ""
    5. Consecutive edits made from 15:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC) to 15:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC)
      1. 15:08, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "category is mentioned"
      2. 15:12, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "/* Medium check-post IS SITUATED IN DONGARGAON. */"
      3. 15:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "category edited"
    6. 15:25, 5 February 2017 (UTC) ""
    7. 13:55, 5 February 2017 (UTC) "Created page with '== INTODUCTION:- == DONGARGAON a village of susner talluk(tehsil) of shajapur district now in agarmalwa district of madhyapradesh is a village which...'"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 19:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Dongargaon ek jannat. (TW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


    Comments:

    User continues to add completely unsourced content to a redirect for an article that already exists. User was warned and asked to improve the existing article rather than continuing at the redirect (which they clearly have ignored.) Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

    Endorsed. I have reverted this user a couple times, with Chrissymad. Yoshi24517 Online 19:41, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

    And now they've gone and created a silly redirect loop... Chrissymad ❯❯❯ ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:55, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

    Blocked – 24 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 20:00, 6 February 2017 (UTC)

    User:Ktrimi991 reported by User:Anastan (Result: Blocked)

    Page
    Banja, Skenderaj (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Ktrimi991 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 13:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC) "Albanian alternative names are deleted too."
    2. 12:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 764165959 by 212.178.226.30 (talk)"
    3. 12:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 764164207 by Zoupan (talk) I even don't understand what those sources say."
    4. 12:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 764163017 by Zoupan (talk) Albanian fascists may be POV. Take to the talk, include there inline citations and propose a more neutral sentence."
    5. 22:36, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "WP:OR"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 13:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Removal of content, blanking on Banja, Skenderaj. (TW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


    Comments:

    User is again breaching 3RR in discretionary sanction area. He is already warned about this article, and reverted once more after the warning, then earlier warned about ARBMAC and also @EdJohnston: seriously warned him not to edit war and to behave. In past 24+ hours he is on fourth, third or second revert on at least 6 articles (Our Lady of Ljeviš, Millosh Gjergj Nikolla, Church of St. John the Baptist, Pećka Banja, Goraždevac, Miloš Obilić, etc...) Not to mention removal of sources, not waiting for any consensus or comment, POV pushing, political agenda, etc, etc and all of that in discretionary sanctions area. In short, very clearly, WP:NOTHERE. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 17:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

    Blocked – 48 hours. This has overtones of ethnic warring. This edit which removes the Serbian alternate name of the district was performed with the not-too-helpful summary "Albanian alternative names are deleted too". The text of the article makes clear that the majority of Banja's inhabitants are Serbian. He has also warred on Albanian versus Serbian names at Our Lady of Ljeviš. EdJohnston (talk) 03:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

    User:EdelweissofNE reported by User:Toddst1 (Result: Blocked)

    Page
    Crossgates Mall (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    EdelweissofNE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC) "Consensus reached on talk page."
    2. 23:13, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "Is this not unrelated?"
    3. 23:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "See talk page."
    4. 21:23, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "I'm sorry but the tenents indicate this as well."
    5. 21:03, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "In this case the term upscale is a fact as it distinguishes itself from a "regional mall" or "class a super regional mall". It's necessary."
    6. 20:51, 6 February 2017 (UTC) second inclusion of the word "upscale"
    7. 20:28, 6 February 2017 (UTC) Initial inclusion of the word "upscale"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 23:24, 6 February 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Crossgates Mall. (TW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
    1. Talk:Crossgates_Mall#Upscale.3F: Long discussion where 5 other editors discuss this repeated addition with clear consensus that this material should not be included, while EdelweissofNE is the sole proponent, rejecting consensus, pursuing WP:IDHT.
    Comments:
    1. Note that EdelweissofNE appears to be a WP:SPA and has contributed to no unrelated articles. Toddst1 (talk) 22:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)

    ---

    1. I haven't had a wiki account in 5+ years. These are my first edits with this one.
    2. Also, I thought the wait period for edit warring was 24 hours not 48. EdelweissofNE (talk) 23:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
    3. Note that no one reverted my edit removing the old photo from the info box that I said "is this not unrelated"
    4. No one disputed my argument or points on the talk page and I was given no reason to believe my consensus was incorrect or unsatisfactory. For some reason Todd doesn't like my edit but why does it give him the right to "rule over" the page and report me when he as given me zero reason to believe I'm wrong. I felt I was fair and completely competent. EdelweissofNE (talk) 23:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)
    Blocked – 48 hours by User:PhilKnight. The editor is determined to make this an 'upscale' mall no matter what anyone else thinks. EdJohnston (talk) 02:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

    User:Namiba reported by User:Twitbookspacetube (Result: Declined)

    Page
    User:Namiba/Linda Cohen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    Namiba (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 01:32, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 764281771 by Twitbookspacetube (talk)"
    2. 01:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 764281489 by Twitbookspacetube (talk)"
    3. 01:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "userfied pages are not up for speedy deletion"
    4. 01:11, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 764279320 by AusLondonder (talk) it's not an article. it's a user sub-page"
    5. 01:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 764278897 by AusLondonder (talk)"
    6. 01:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "Undid revision 764278328 by AusLondonder (talk)"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 01:31, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "Final warning: Removing file deletion tags on User:Namiba/Linda Cohen. (TW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
    Comments:

    Edit warring to remove CSD tags on article previously deleted per discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Linda_Cohen Twitbookspacetube (talk) 01:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

    This is already being discussed elsewhere elsewhere. It was my impression that user pages are the domain of the user and adding the deletion tags was a continued form of badgering by AusLondoner, which is being discussed already at ANI. If I am wrong re: user pages, I apologize for the misunderstanding.--TM 01:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
    They ignored warnings and removed the tags from two locations *after* being told G4 applied and *after* being repeatedly warned. AusLondonder (talk) 01:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

    User:68.186.227.145 reported by User:Callmemirela (Result: Semi)

    Page
    The Vampire Diaries (season 8) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
    User being reported
    68.186.227.145 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
    Previous version reverted to
    Diffs of the user's reverts
    1. 02:24, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "/* Episodes */New information"
    2. 01:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "/* Episodes */New information"
    3. 01:05, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "/* Episodes */New information"
    4. 01:02, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "/* Episodes */New information"
    5. 00:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "/* Episodes */New information"
    6. 05:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC) "/* Episodes */New information"
    7. 00:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC) "/* Episodes */New information"
    Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
    1. 00:37, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "Warning: Addition of unsourced or improperly cited material. (TW)"
    2. 01:03, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "Final warning notice. (TW)"
    3. 01:06, 8 February 2017 (UTC) "Final warning notice. (TW)"
    Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page


    Comments:

    This IP is consistently adding an unsourced title despite many warnings and edit summaries. I went over to ANI to get this resolved, but I am now here since it's mounting to severe edit warring. Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 02:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)

    Thank you! Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 03:16, 8 February 2017 (UTC)
    Categories:
    Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring: Difference between revisions Add topic