| Revision as of 15:03, 22 September 2006 editBluedustmite (talk | contribs)1,191 edits →[]: delete← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:52, 22 September 2006 edit undoAmcbride (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers6,453 edits →[]: vote delete, with thoughts on 4th nominationNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| *'''Delete'''Non-notable person.Misplaced Pages is not here to smear living non-notable persons who are related to someone the editor doesn't like. OOH! He got a SPEEDING TICKET when he was 17!!!!! What could be more "encyclopedic" than that!!!] 14:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete'''Non-notable person.Misplaced Pages is not here to smear living non-notable persons who are related to someone the editor doesn't like. OOH! He got a SPEEDING TICKET when he was 17!!!!! What could be more "encyclopedic" than that!!!] 14:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per ]. I would also support a '''redirect''' to ], since everything noteable about Gore III is already mentioned in that article. —] 15:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' per ]. I would also support a '''redirect''' to ], since everything noteable about Gore III is already mentioned in that article. —] 15:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' per the reasons I gave when I made the second nomination (not enough verifiable information for an NPOV article; what info we have can be covered in ]). That said, I'm not sure what to think about this latest nomination. Under normal circumstances, I would say it's way too soon after the last nomination. On the other hand, the last nomination went several days without being listed, and I suspect this might have skewed the results. It seems -- and this could be just my imagination -- that AfDers who vote early are more likely to vote delete, and those who vote later are more likely to vote keep, and the last nomination may have sort of missed the delete voters and picked up all the keep voters. So I'm adding my vote and hoping people take this nom seriously, but also acknowledging that people saying "what the heck?" have a point. --] 15:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:52, 22 September 2006
Al Gore III
Strong Delete:This article has no bearing on information that would be found in an encyclopedia of any kind. This information is more likely to be found in a tabloid type newspaper.--MechCommander 08:19, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 12:28, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Previous AFD's:
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (second nomination) (Closed No consensus 4 August 2006)
- Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Al Gore III (3rd nomination) (Closed Keep 19 September 2006)
- Delete - his parents are famous, but notability is only transferable by heredity if you're a royal. It would surprise me not one bit if he becomes more significant in some field or another, but he hasn't yet. BigHaz - Schreit mich an (Review me) 12:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep The last AFD closed three days ago! Fan-1967 13:40, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep The consensus was good then, why the rush to try again without new arguments, I don't know. Mister.Manticore 14:17, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- DeleteNon-notable person.Misplaced Pages is not here to smear living non-notable persons who are related to someone the editor doesn't like. OOH! He got a SPEEDING TICKET when he was 17!!!!! What could be more "encyclopedic" than that!!!Edison 14:54, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:BIO. I would also support a redirect to Al Gore, since everything noteable about Gore III is already mentioned in that article. —dustmite 15:03, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per the reasons I gave when I made the second nomination (not enough verifiable information for an NPOV article; what info we have can be covered in Al Gore). That said, I'm not sure what to think about this latest nomination. Under normal circumstances, I would say it's way too soon after the last nomination. On the other hand, the last nomination went several days without being listed, and I suspect this might have skewed the results. It seems -- and this could be just my imagination -- that AfDers who vote early are more likely to vote delete, and those who vote later are more likely to vote keep, and the last nomination may have sort of missed the delete voters and picked up all the keep voters. So I'm adding my vote and hoping people take this nom seriously, but also acknowledging that people saying "what the heck?" have a point. --Allen 15:52, 22 September 2006 (UTC)