Revision as of 20:32, 7 January 2018 editJpgordon (talk | contribs)Checkusers, Administrators82,524 edits →January 2018← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:35, 10 January 2018 edit undoNeilN (talk | contribs)134,455 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
{{unblock reviewed| reason=Deleted adjectives which I believe went against Misplaced Pages's neutrality terms. If adjectives such as "extremist" are used to describe Scott Roeder and others, than they should cite sources which prove that he is indeed an extremist|decline=You are blocked for ], not for the content of your edits. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)}} | {{unblock reviewed| reason=Deleted adjectives which I believe went against Misplaced Pages's neutrality terms. If adjectives such as "extremist" are used to describe Scott Roeder and others, than they should cite sources which prove that he is indeed an extremist|decline=You are blocked for ], not for the content of your edits. ]<sup><small>]</small></sup> 20:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)}} | ||
<div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px">]To enforce an ] decision you have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''1 week'''. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions. <p>If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] (specifically ]) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. --><span style="font-size:97%;">{{tlx|unblock|2=reason=Please copy my appeal to the [[WP:AE{{!}}arbitration enforcement noticeboard]] or [[WP:AN{{!}}administrators' noticeboard]]. ''Your reason here OR place the reason below this template.'' ~~~~}}</span>. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the ] on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (]), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. ] <sup>]</sup> 22:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC) <div class="sysop-show"><hr/><p style="line-height: 90%;"><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following ] regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."</small></p></div></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> |
Revision as of 22:35, 10 January 2018
January 2018
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring, as you did at George Tiller. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. NeilN 20:20, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).
Thegoodmanisamazing (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Deleted adjectives which I believe went against Misplaced Pages's neutrality terms. If adjectives such as "extremist" are used to describe Scott Roeder and others, than they should cite sources which prove that he is indeed an extremist
Decline reason:
You are blocked for edit warring, not for the content of your edits. --jpgordon 20:32, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
To enforce an arbitration decision you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week. You are welcome to edit once the block expires; however, please note that the repetition of similar behavior may result in a longer block or other sanctions.If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing blocks (specifically this section) before appealing. Place the following on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Please copy my appeal to the ] or ]. Your reason here OR place the reason below this template. ~~~~}}
. If you intend to appeal on the arbitration enforcement noticeboard I suggest you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template on your talk page so it can be copied over easily. You may also appeal directly to me (by email), before or instead of appealing on your talk page. NeilN 22:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Reminder to administrators: In May 2014, ArbCom adopted the following procedure instructing administrators regarding Arbitration Enforcement blocks: "No administrator may modify a sanction placed by another administrator without: (1) the explicit prior affirmative consent of the enforcing administrator; or (2) prior affirmative agreement for the modification at (a) AE or (b) AN or (c) ARCA (see "Important notes" ). Administrators modifying sanctions out of process may at the discretion of the committee be desysopped."