Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
*] is placed under ]. -] (]) 15:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
*] is placed under ]. -] (]) 15:17, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
*{{user|Abbot Luigi}} is banned from ] and related pages for three months. --] <sup>]</sup> 21:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
*{{user|Abbot Luigi}} is banned from ] and related pages for three months. --] <sup>]</sup> 21:32, 6 April 2018 (UTC)
title=User_talk:{{User:NeilN}} is a flaming leftist political gatekeeper attempting to enforce an arbitrary political opinion on ] and related pages in violation of wikipedia's standards of objective and neutral regard to subject and facts around the subject.
This is the central log for all sanctions issued pursuant to an Arbitration Committee contentious topics remedy in 2018 as well as any appeals or modifications made to sanctions issued in 2018.
The required information is the user or page the sanction is being applied to, enforcing administrator, date, nature of sanction, including expiry date (if applicable), basis or context (such as link to AE request), and a diff of the user notification (if applicable).
“
All sanctions and page restrictions must be logged by the administrator who applied the sanction or page restriction at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration enforcement log. Whenever a sanction or page restriction is appealed or modified, the administrator amending it must append a note recording the amendment to the original log entry.
To be valid, sanctions must be clearly and unambiguously labelled as an arbitration enforcement action (such as with "arbitration enforcement", "arb enforcement", "AE" or "WP:AE" in the Misplaced Pages log entry or the edit summary). If a sanction has been logged as an arbitration enforcement action but has not been clearly labelled as an arbitration enforcement action any uninvolved administrator may amend the sanction (for example, a null edit or reblocking with the same settings) on behalf of the original administrator. Labelling a sanction which has been logged does not make the administrator who added the label the "enforcing administrator" unless there is confusion as to who intended the sanction be arbitration enforcement.
A central log of all page restrictions and sanctions (including blocks, bans, page protections or other restrictions) placed as arbitration enforcement (including contentious topic restrictions) is to be maintained by the Committee and its clerks at Misplaced Pages:Arbitration enforcement log.
DHeyward is banned for one month from all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, broadly construed. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:23, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Anthony22 blocked for 24 hours for violation of the 1RR restriction currently in effect on Donald Trump. User was warned several times, including a direct warning on the talk page of the article during a 6 hour full protection which had been placed to allow the user time to fully review the restrictions. As soon as the page protection was lifted, they continued to edit-war... over a typo. User claimed it was vandalism, typos are not vandalism by any means and the user who instated the edit has been trusted with the rollback right. That user was also warned but is not named here as the action was not considered to require AE action at this time. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 16:41, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
Block has been lifted as semi-protection will work for now. If IP continues behavior in other articles a block will be necessary again. — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 11:16, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Template:Did you know nominations/Trump Street - fully protected as discussion had already ended on hook approval... protection to prevent continuous attempts to thwart the community policy BLP and the Arbitration ruling WP:ARBAP2. Protection may be lifted when deemed necessary by an administrator to promote the hook to a prep area. (Note for authorization: Hooks, ALT1, 3, 4, and 5 do not fall under the DS system, however hooks 0, 2 and 6 all fall under the AP2 topic area.) — Coffee // have a ☕️ // beans // 01:00, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Committed identity: 8817b3e625061223bfd1617028234e0594f4278ef91a5c7576f7679c056d880bb2dd4eb0aa515e6d1ceabbd272f51ae5407bd969637e0df82f93ac3dac5994f0 is a SHA-512commitment to this user's real-life identity.
is a flaming leftist political gatekeeper attempting to enforce an arbitrary political opinion on Breitbart News and related pages in violation of wikipedia's standards of objective and neutral regard to subject and facts around the subject.
Amy Foster blocked from editing indefinitely for repeatedly trolling BLPs, with the first year as an arbitration enforcement action. The block will then revert to a normal block. GoldenRing (talk) 09:38, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
not to personalize disputes or to use inflammatory language ("comment on the content, not the contributor");
not to impede the formation of consensus by being too bold with talk page actions (specifically, they should not take it upon themselves to maintain or "clerk" any discussions);
not to impede the formation of consensus by repeatedly making the same points;
to acknowledge consensus can change and having external events bring increased scrutiny and change to potential walled gardens of articles can be beneficial and should not be ridiculed. --NeilN23:46, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
PatLaffan (talk·contribs) is topic banned for the period of one week from making any edit about, and any edit to all pages relating to, the governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. GorillaWarfare(talk)04:57, 31 March 2018 (UTC)
72bikers (talk·contribs) is banned for three months from making more than one revert per 24 hours (WP:1RR) on any page related to "gun control" including governmental regulation of firearm ownership; the social, historical and political context of such regulation; and the people and organizations associated with these issues. --NeilN19:07, 2 April 2018 (UTC)
Topic ban changed to following restrictions: 1) Not remove any WP:G5 tags from WP:ARBIPA articles 2) Observe WP:1RR with autoconfirmed editors on WP:ARBIPA topics 3) Ensure the sources he's using fully and accurately back up the content he's proposing. He will be required to produce the necessary excerpts from sources if challenged by an experienced editor 4) Take care not to misrepresent the validity or reliability of a source. Failure to abide by any one or more of these conditions may result in an immediate topic ban or block. --NeilN01:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
User was blocked for one month, on 2018-02-06. This was initially a longer block, but discussion at WP:ANI (currently, here) showed a consensus to shorten the block. The 1 year topic ban restarts on completion of the block and thus, ends on 2019-03-06. --Yamla (talk) 20:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Hyper9 (talk·contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from all Misplaced Pages pages and discussions connected with Indian history including languages/linguistic history, per . The user is encouraged to appeal the sanction no sooner than six months from now, with evidence that they have contributed constructively in other parts of Misplaced Pages or in our sister projects in the meantime. Bishonen | talk19:37, 26 February 2018 (UTC).
Nagadeepa (talk·contribs) is indefinitely topic banned from all Misplaced Pages pages and discussions connected with Indian languages, per . The user is encouraged to appeal the sanction no sooner than six months from now, with evidence that they have contributed constructively in other parts of Misplaced Pages or in our sister projects in the meantime. Bishonen | talk19:37, 26 February 2018 (UTC).
Andrew Davidson (talk·contribs) is advised per the WP:AE discussion here that before commenting further in the Caste system in India topic area (broadly interpreted), they need to gain a deeper understanding of the subject. They are warned to only offer comments or article edits supported by directly relevant sources judged to be reliable and of high quality. Sources without recent consensus must be presented for review first. If the user intends to work on the draft User:Colonel Warden/List of Indian castes, which has been languishing for five years, that work is to be exempted from the restrictions mentioned, i.e. Andrew Davidson is allowed while it's still in userspace to offer weaker comments and sources there, provided this work gradually leads up to acceptable quality and sourcing, before it's offered for mainspace. Failure to comply with this warning will result in a topic ban or other sanction. Bishonen | talk23:19, 20 March 2018 (UTC).
Use this section to record the enforcement of ArbCom decisions not made as part of a case. For example, unblock conditions where the editor wasn't banned in a case.
Misplaced Pages:Arbitration enforcement log/2018: Difference between revisions
Add topic