Revision as of 04:27, 26 May 2018 view sourceMeters (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers172,878 edits →User:Harvardgrad8897 reported by User:Meters (Result: ): and another one← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:38, 26 May 2018 view source EdJohnston (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Checkusers, Administrators71,232 edits →User:Harvardgrad8897 reported by User:Meters (Result: Blocks): ClosingNext edit → | ||
Line 206: | Line 206: | ||
;<u>Comments:</u> | ;<u>Comments:</u> | ||
== ] reported by ] (Result: ) == | == ] reported by ] (Result: Blocks) == | ||
;Page: {{pagelinks|Gail Lese}} | ;Page: {{pagelinks|Gail Lese}} | ||
Line 233: | Line 233: | ||
And now that this user is at AN3 a new account ] is created and three minutes later restores the edit with a similar sounding summary ] (]) 04:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC) | And now that this user is at AN3 a new account ] is created and three minutes later restores the edit with a similar sounding summary ] (]) 04:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC) | ||
:{{AN3|b}} – 48 hours to ] for edit warring and one week to ], an apparent sock. ] (]) 04:37, 26 May 2018 (UTC) |
Revision as of 04:38, 26 May 2018
Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles, content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
This page is for reporting active edit warriors and recent violations of restrictions like the three-revert rule.
- See this guide for instructions on creating diffs for this report.
- If you see that a user may be about to violate the three-revert rule, consider warning them by placing {{subst:uw-3rr}} on their user talk page.
You must notify any user you have reported.
You may use {{subst:An3-notice}} ~~~~
to do so.
You can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.
- Additional notes
- When reporting a user here, your own behavior will also be scrutinized. Be sure you understand WP:REVERT and the definitions below first.
- The format and contents of a 3RR/1RR report are important, use the "Click here to create a new report" button below to have a report template with the necessary fields to work from.
- Possible alternatives to filing here are dispute resolution, or a request for page protection.
- Violations of other restrictions, like WP:1RR violations, may also be brought here. Your report should include two reverts that occurred within a 24-hour period, and a link to where the 1RR restriction was imposed.
- Definition of edit warring
- Definition of the three-revert rule (3RR)
Sections older than 48 hours are archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.
Twinkle's ARV can be used on the user's page to more easily report their behavior, including automatic handling of diffs. |
Administrators' (archives, search) | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
349 | 350 | 351 | 352 | 353 | 354 | 355 | 356 | 357 | 358 |
359 | 360 | 361 | 362 | 363 | 364 | 365 | 366 | 367 | 368 |
Incidents (archives, search) | |||||||||
1157 | 1158 | 1159 | 1160 | 1161 | 1162 | 1163 | 1164 | 1165 | 1166 |
1167 | 1168 | 1169 | 1170 | 1171 | 1172 | 1173 | 1174 | 1175 | 1176 |
Edit-warring/3RR (archives, search) | |||||||||
472 | 473 | 474 | 475 | 476 | 477 | 478 | 479 | 480 | 481 |
482 | 483 | 484 | 485 | 486 | 487 | 488 | 489 | 490 | 491 |
Arbitration enforcement (archives) | |||||||||
328 | 329 | 330 | 331 | 332 | 333 | 334 | 335 | 336 | 337 |
338 | 339 | 340 | 341 | 342 | 343 | 344 | 345 | 346 | 347 |
Other links | |||||||||
User:TDN92 reported by User:Mztourist (Result: Defer to the SPI)
Page: Viet Cong attack on Tan Son Nhut Air Base (1966) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: TDN92 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Previous version reverted to:
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
User:TDN:92 and IP:117.6.92.136 (possibly an IP sock) have been edit-warring the results of this and various other First Indochina War and Vietnam War battles. I referred this to discussion of the Talk page which has been fruitless. Mztourist (talk) 05:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- See also WP:Sockpuppet investigations/Dino nam. I am almost at the point of indeffing TDN92 as a sock of Dino nam based on behavior, but now that there is an SPI, let's see what happens there. EdJohnston (talk) 17:15, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Result: Deferring to the SPI. If this editor continues to revert and the SPI isn't resolved, post on my talk page and maybe something can be done. EdJohnston (talk) 01:12, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
User:Mr KEBAB reported by User:Softlavender (Result: No action)
Page: Richard Wagner (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Mr KEBAB (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
- Just read my edit summaries, which the OP has refused to do. (S)he also required me to provide a citation when the transcription was unsourced to begin with. Mr KEBAB (talk) 16:18, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- I did no such thing. Provide diffs of your claims. Softlavender (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- , , Mr KEBAB (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- The first diff is not me; the second and third diffs prove your claim is false. Softlavender (talk) 16:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but that doesn't change much. It still means you didn't read my edit summaries. Mr KEBAB (talk) 16:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Provide diffs or other proof to substantiate that ad hominem claim. Softlavender (talk) 16:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think I'll quit this pointless discussion. Mr KEBAB (talk) 16:34, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Provide diffs or other proof to substantiate that ad hominem claim. Softlavender (talk) 16:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Fair enough, but that doesn't change much. It still means you didn't read my edit summaries. Mr KEBAB (talk) 16:30, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- The first diff is not me; the second and third diffs prove your claim is false. Softlavender (talk) 16:28, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- , , Mr KEBAB (talk) 16:23, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- I did no such thing. Provide diffs of your claims. Softlavender (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- For what it's worth, when the comment
<!-- Do not change this without a source -->
was added to the article, the vowel was already Template:IPA-de. It appears it was changed to Template:IPA-de by an IP, probably inadvertently, as their summary explains other changes in the edit but not the one to the first vowel. So I doubt those who reverted Mr KEBAB had any grounding, but Mr KEBAB also could have certainly handled it in a more respectful manner. Nardog (talk) 16:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC) - I must also note that the fourth diff provided by the reporter is not a revert, just a removal of a comment telling people not to edit something already unsourced without providing a source. This strikes me as an WP:OWNERSHIP issue on the part of the two who reverted Mr KEBAB's edit. They reverted it simply because it was a change to something that stood in a featured article for very long, without examining the validity of his edit, which they could have done by simply clicking the notation and reading Help:IPA/Standard German. But Mr KEBAB also could have and should have spared passive-agressive or uncivil comments in summaries on his talk and continued trying to get his point across, such as quoting or pointing to the relevant part of the help page, initiating a conversation on the talk, or citing an external source like Duden. Nardog (talk) 17:01, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please read WP:3RR. "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert." (underscoring mine) Softlavender (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Well, if it weren't him someone should have removed such a silly comment a long time ago, if you ask me. Nardog (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- He was warned about 3RR but made a fourth revert anyway. That's a 3RR violation. Softlavender (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't revert anyone but removed an inappropriate hidden message. Mr KEBAB (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please read WP:3RR. "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert." (underscoring mine) Softlavender (talk) 17:19, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- I didn't revert anyone but removed an inappropriate hidden message. Mr KEBAB (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- He was warned about 3RR but made a fourth revert anyway. That's a 3RR violation. Softlavender (talk) 17:14, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Well, if it weren't him someone should have removed such a silly comment a long time ago, if you ask me. Nardog (talk) 17:10, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please read WP:3RR. "An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. An edit or a series of consecutive edits that undoes other editors' actions—whether in whole or in part—counts as a revert." (underscoring mine) Softlavender (talk) 17:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Has Nardog's edit resolved the dispute? --NeilN 18:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Result: No action. This war may have stopped. Report again if it continues. EdJohnston (talk) 01:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
User:Altamimi579 reported by User:wikaviani (Result: Blocked)
Page: Al-Awamiyah (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
User being reported: Altamimi579 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Diffs of the user's reverts:
Diff of edit warring / 3RR warning:
Diff of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page:
Comments:
Please note that Altamimi579 has made more disruptive edits : , and . This last edit reverted my attempt to bring back the stable version and occured after many attempts to discuss with the reported user : , , , and . The user Altamimi579 firmly declined any attempt to gain consensus : . I would welcome the eye of an admin regarding this user's behavior. Best regards.Wikaviani (talk) 17:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Blocked – 31 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 15:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
User:WilliamJE reported by User:BrownHairedGirl (Result: Blocked)
- Page
- Category:Rayne Red Sox players (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- WilliamJE (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 00:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "I've replied to you. You don't know baseball or the wikiproject baseball. Go to WikiProject Baseball's talk page."
- 00:02, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "See my reply at CFD."
- 23:53, 24 May 2018 (UTC) "Isn't the same team. Not the way minor league baseball players are sorted either. See Category:Syracuse Chiefs players and Category:Syracuse SkyChiefs players"
- 12:52, 24 May 2018 (UTC) "Not a category for this page."
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
4 reverts ~12 hours. User warned in edit summary here and in discussion here. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
I replied to BHG here multiple times. She hasn't even tried to rebutt me or taken it to WikiProject Baseball as I told her. She comes here instead. That says alot....William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 00:53, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- William, I tried to have a discussion with you per WP:BRD. You kept on reverting, so naturally I came here to get you to stop. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 00:58, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- You haven't responded once to my rebuttal or gone to WikiProject baseball. Again you come here to bully. What does that say about you. Your edit summaries here and here use the word silliness. What does that unnecessary word saw about you? I can point out another instance of you trying to bully or mock me. So when are you going to WikiProject Baseball's talk page?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- William, I replied to you twice, but you kept on reverting. That silliness is why you are here. Which part of WP:3RR is unclear to you? --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 02:41, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- You haven't responded once to my rebuttal or gone to WikiProject baseball. Again you come here to bully. What does that say about you. Your edit summaries here and here use the word silliness. What does that unnecessary word saw about you? I can point out another instance of you trying to bully or mock me. So when are you going to WikiProject Baseball's talk page?...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 01:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Blocked – 31 hours by User:Longhair. EdJohnston (talk) 02:57, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
User:Aligulla reported by User:Krimuk2.0 (Result: Blocked)
- Page
- Alia Bhatt (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- Aligulla (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 11:17, 25 May 2018 (UTC) ""
- 11:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC) ""
- 10:39, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "she is not british actress however she got british nationality.if she is proud of to be british not indian then she has to work in british movies."
- 22:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC) ""
- 22:05, 24 May 2018 (UTC) ""
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- 10:48, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Alia Bhatt. (TW)"
- 11:08, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* May 2018 */ re"
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
Repeatedly changing the actress' nationality despite reference in article (which I also posted on their talk page), in which the actress and her father claim otherwise. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 11:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- Blocked – 48 hours. EdJohnston (talk) 01:06, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
User:Nilkpo reported by User:Saqib (Result: Blocked 24 hours)
- Page
- Mary Gill (politician) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- Nilkpo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 17:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
- 17:33, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
- 17:30, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
- 17:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
- 16:22, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "/* Political career */"
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- 17:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Caution: Not adhering to neutral point of view on Mary Gill (politician). (TW)"
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
Clearly engaging in edit warring and writing BLPs like a news story. see the user talk page for warnings. Saqib (talk) 17:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- I blocked Nilkpo for 24 hours. -- Ed (Edgar181) 18:01, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
User:108.206.145.38 reported by User:Geraldo Perez (Result: )
- Page
- Template:Demi Lovato (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- 108.206.145.38 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Previous version reverted to
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 22:10, 25 May 2018 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 14:18, 25 May 2018 (UTC) to 14:21, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- 02:55, 25 May 2018 (UTC) ""
- Consecutive edits made from 22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC) to 22:07, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- 22:25, 24 May 2018 (UTC) "Caution: Unconstructive editing on Template:Demi Lovato. (TW)"
- 03:06, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "more on reasons"
- 19:07, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Three-revert rule on Template:Demi Lovato. (TW)"
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- Comments:
User:Harvardgrad8897 reported by User:Meters (Result: Blocks)
- Page
- Gail Lese (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
- User being reported
- Harvardgrad8897 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
- Diffs of the user's reverts
- 00:30, 26 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842956611 by Meters (talk) this is a factual news item with a verified third party noting Gail else’s arrrst."
- 20:52, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842955090 by Meters (talk) no violation. Gail lese is a public figure. Her arrest of assault with a dangerous weapon and possession of a dangerous weapon were reported in the daily item and it has been properly sourced."
- 20:45, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842955090 by Meters (talk)"
- 20:35, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842945205 by Chevoitkate247 ( ]) this is from a credible newspaper “the daily item” which is part of the Essex media group publications. Gail leases arrest was published in the police log section of this daily newspaper. Gail lese is a public figure (ran for state senate) so the argument of BLPCRIME is not relevant. Users should be able to add relevant third party sourced data about a public figure."
- 18:48, 23 May 2018 (UTC) "Undid revision 842501290 by Chevoitkate247 (talk) Gail Lese is a public figure that ran for state senate. this is referenced in the article. she is also a published MD and American CEO. the arrest reference is attributed to a credible third party media outlet."|warnings=# 20:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Gail Lese.
- Diffs of edit warring / 3RR warning
- 20:47, 25 May 2018 (UTC) "Warning: Edit warring on Gail Lese.
- Diffs of attempt to resolve dispute on article talk page
- 21:29, May 22, 2018 (UTC) on Talk:Gail Lese "Removed personal life, violates WP:BLPCRIME
- full thread has multiple posts
- Comments:
Restoring BLP violating criminal material. Subject made one unsuccessful run for public office so is unlikely to be a public figure, thus this violates WP:BLPCRIME. Even if the subject is considered well-known, the one source does not pass WP:WELLKNOWN. The editor has made no attempt to respond to the article talk page or user talk page posts. Meters (talk) 00:52, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
The source is just a police blotter report of an arrest, with no mention of any trial or conviction. Meters (talk) 01:18, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
And now that this user is at AN3 a new account user:Gregtravelp is created and three minutes later restores the edit with a similar sounding summary Meters (talk) 04:27, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- Blocked – 48 hours to User:Harvardgrad8897 for edit warring and one week to User:Gregtravelp, an apparent sock. EdJohnston (talk) 04:37, 26 May 2018 (UTC)