Misplaced Pages

Talk:Soviet Union: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:54, 9 October 2020 editBruce leverett (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,853 edits On discussion for inclusion of leftist perspective.← Previous edit Revision as of 07:09, 9 October 2020 edit undoJack Upland (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users31,892 edits On discussion for inclusion of leftist perspective.Next edit →
Line 91: Line 91:
{{u|Jack Upland}} What's wrong with the the leftist section in you're opinion? You said it's wrong, how so. Thanks. ] (]) 00:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC) {{u|Jack Upland}} What's wrong with the the leftist section in you're opinion? You said it's wrong, how so. Thanks. ] (]) 00:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
:Not enough sourcing. I suppose that the paper by Howard and King may be a reliable source, but you cited it without giving the reader any way to find it, e.g. no journal title, date, etc. The rest of the section has no reliable sources at all. The "ABC of Anarchism" is not a reliable source (I don't even know who the author is, other than Berkman), and is generally unhelpful and marginally relevant. If you don't provide sources, the reader is left to assume that you are making it all up. ] (]) 04:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC) :Not enough sourcing. I suppose that the paper by Howard and King may be a reliable source, but you cited it without giving the reader any way to find it, e.g. no journal title, date, etc. The rest of the section has no reliable sources at all. The "ABC of Anarchism" is not a reliable source (I don't even know who the author is, other than Berkman), and is generally unhelpful and marginally relevant. If you don't provide sources, the reader is left to assume that you are making it all up. ] (]) 04:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
::I agree with the above. I don't think Howard and King actually support the assertions made in the article. Their conclusion is: "Thus the state capitalist hypothesis is unpersuasive... It is more appropriate to see the Soviet Union as a challenger to all forms of capitalism. Not a genuine socialist challenge, certainly, but a real menace which for several decades was regarded as the principal threat to their power by the ruling classes of all actual capitalisms". As far as I know (and as indicated by Howard and King), the main supporters of the state capitalist hypothesis are the followers of ], who are by no means the majority of leftists. Overall, the section refers to the opinions of some leftists, but doesn't establish that these are the main opinions held by leftists. And what timeframe are you talking about? The ''ABC of Anarchism'' was written in 1928 (when the USSR was only 6 years old). This doesn't really fit under "Legacy".--] (]) 07:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:09, 9 October 2020

Skip to table of contents
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Soviet Union article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
Article policies
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.

Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Misplaced Pages, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. Editors are advised to familiarise themselves with the contentious topics procedures before editing this page.

Template:Vital article

The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information.
This page is not a forum for general discussion about Soviet Union. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Soviet Union at the Reference desk.
Former good articleSoviet Union was one of the good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 2, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
August 13, 2006Good article reassessmentDelisted
On this day...Facts from this article were featured on Misplaced Pages's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 8, 2004, and December 26, 2006.
Current status: Delisted good article
This article has not yet been rated on Misplaced Pages's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSoviet Union Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconSocialism Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Socialism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of socialism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SocialismWikipedia:WikiProject SocialismTemplate:WikiProject Socialismsocialism
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconAtheism Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
For more information and how you can help, click the link opposite:

If you would like to participate, you can edit this article and visit the project page.

Quick help

Recent activity


To do

Join WikiProject atheism and be bold.

Be consistent

  • Use a "standard" layout for atheism-related articles (see layout style, "The perfect article" and Featured articles).
  • Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
  • Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether ] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.

Maintenance, etc.

Articles to improve

Create

  • Articles on notable atheists


Expand

Immediate attention

  • State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
  • False choice into False dilemma: discuss whether you are for or against this merge here
  • Clarify references in Atheism using footnotes.
  • Secular movement defines it as a being restricted to America in the 21st century.
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconRussia: History / Human geography Top‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Misplaced Pages.
To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
TopThis article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.
WikiProject iconFormer countries (inactive)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesFormer countries
Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconHistory Mid‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Misplaced Pages. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory
MidThis article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
Template:WP1.0
Archiving icon
Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19



This page has archives. Sections older than 91 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present.


Misleading HDI figures

The HDI figure cited for the Soviet Union is from the 1990 version of HDI. This used a method so old that the Misplaced Pages article on HDI does not even cover it. To be specific, here are the notable differences in the 1990 method:

  • The Life Expectancy max and min was not 85 and 25, but was instead the highest and lowest from that year, 78.4 and 41.8
  • Education just used the adult literacy rate. Similar method for selecting max and min, 100 and 12.3 respectively.
  • Similar for GDP per capita log max and min, which were 3.68 and 2.34.

The inclusion of a 1990 HDI figure here is clearly going to mislead people, as it's not clear that a 1990 HDI figure represents not only a different date but also a totally different methodology. To give you an idea of how big the difference is, the US 2018 HDI figure is 0.920. This may lead someone to think that the HDI of the USSR in 1990 and the US today is comparable. However, if you calculated the US HDI using the 1990 method, you'd get somewhere between 1.200 and 1.300. Yes, over 1.

For now, I have removed the HDI from the infobox. It could be replaced with a 1990 figure calculated using the current method, if such data could be found.Tophattingson (talk) 02:37, 22 February 2020 (UTC)

There is an HDI value for 1990 using current methods in Human Development Report 2019. They describe the issues you mention in this report on Russia and present an HDI value of 0.734 for 1990. I've added this value to the infobox. Subvisser5 (talk) 21:43, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Might it not be a good idea to cite the source? Also, mention (in the footnote) that the source's figure of 0.734 is for Russia only, not for the whole Soviet Union. Bruce leverett (talk) 22:29, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Small text in infobox

@CapLiber: @Davide King: The use of small text in the infobox, for example "de jure" and "de facto", makes it hard to read on a mobile device. I notice that this is explicitly mentioned in MOS:SMALLTEXT, which strongly discourages editors from the practice. I will fix this, unless there are objections. Thanks for your attention. Bruce leverett (talk) 04:35, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

Bruce leverett @CapLiber: I agree. What's the point of using Template small? I've seen too much use of it in Infoboxes. For de jure and de facto, we can just use br (or even just put a note) but what's the point of small? I checked on my phone and it's not necessary; only is needed is the br, it doesn't split in normal characters. Same thing for the English translation for motto and anthem, what's the point? The text doesn't split either on desktop or phone, so why? In this specific case, Nowrap and small should be used only once to make sure the Union of the Soviet Socialist Republic name doesn't split up.--Davide King (talk) 16:20, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

I think this article skims over the history also when talking about the famine in Ukraine I think go into more detail since it is a very confusing topic and can easily be misinterpreted and probably has, another thing is that the U.S.S.R was too influential to let anyone edit the article after all it’s very recent history so it has a lasting impact and Captain James Cook was special enough to get special editing access so defiantly the Soviet Union should receive such treatment.14.200.36.51 (talk) 01:05, 14 June 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 8 July 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

The short description for this article lists the Soviet Union's active years as 1992 to 1991.

Communist state in Europe and Asia that lasted from 1992 to 1991

Can we correct this to "1922 to 1991"? Rmuzzey (talk) 22:36, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

 Done, thanks! Pupsterlove02 talkcontribs 23:23, 8 July 2020 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 2 October 2020

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

A troika and brief power struggle needs to be changed to "after a troika and brief power struggle" ItsAHooman (talk) 20:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

ItsAHooman Done, thanks for the small edit. It makes much more grammatical sense to have "after a troika and brief power struggle". Vallee01 (talk) 20:49, 8 October 2020 (UTC)

On discussion for inclusion of leftist perspective.

Jack Upland What's wrong with the the leftist section in you're opinion? You said it's wrong, how so. Thanks. Vallee01 (talk) 00:15, 9 October 2020 (UTC)

Not enough sourcing. I suppose that the paper by Howard and King may be a reliable source, but you cited it without giving the reader any way to find it, e.g. no journal title, date, etc. The rest of the section has no reliable sources at all. The "ABC of Anarchism" is not a reliable source (I don't even know who the author is, other than Berkman), and is generally unhelpful and marginally relevant. If you don't provide sources, the reader is left to assume that you are making it all up. Bruce leverett (talk) 04:53, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
I agree with the above. I don't think Howard and King actually support the assertions made in the article. Their conclusion is: "Thus the state capitalist hypothesis is unpersuasive... It is more appropriate to see the Soviet Union as a challenger to all forms of capitalism. Not a genuine socialist challenge, certainly, but a real menace which for several decades was regarded as the principal threat to their power by the ruling classes of all actual capitalisms". As far as I know (and as indicated by Howard and King), the main supporters of the state capitalist hypothesis are the followers of Tony Cliff, who are by no means the majority of leftists. Overall, the section refers to the opinions of some leftists, but doesn't establish that these are the main opinions held by leftists. And what timeframe are you talking about? The ABC of Anarchism was written in 1928 (when the USSR was only 6 years old). This doesn't really fit under "Legacy".--Jack Upland (talk) 07:09, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Categories:
Talk:Soviet Union: Difference between revisions Add topic