| Revision as of 11:54, 11 December 2020 view sourceTrangaBellam (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers22,563 edits unbalanced criticism. need separate section. all opinionsTags: Reverted Visual edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:59, 12 December 2020 view source Ytpks896 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,541 edits Reverted 1 edit by TrangaBellam (talk)Tags: Manual revert Reverted Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web editNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{short description|Indian news agency}} | {{short description|Indian news agency}} | ||
| {{pp-protected|reason=Persistent ]|small=yes}} | |||
| {{Infobox company | {{Infobox company | ||
| | name = Asian News International | | name = Asian News International | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| {{More citations needed|date=April 2020}} | |||
| ⚫ | '''Asian News International''' ('''ANI''') is an Indian ] that offers syndicated multimedia news feed to |
||
| ⚫ | '''Asian News International''' ('''ANI''') is an Indian ] based in ], ] that offers syndicated multimedia news feed to plethora of news-bureaus in ] and beyond.<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=MHujEBLJcvIC&pg=PA63|title=News Agencies from Pigeon to Internet|last1=Shrivastava|first1=K. M.|date=2007|publisher=Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd|isbn=9781932705676|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=sVffFCoGSuIC&pg=PA122|title=International News in the 21st Century|last1=Paterson|first1=Chris A.|last2=Sreberny|first2=Annabelle|date=2004|publisher=Georgetown University Press|isbn=9781860205965|page=122|language=en}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.outlookindia.com/magazine/story/footaging-it-fleetly/288837|title=Footaging It Fleetly|website=Outlook India Magazine|access-date=2019-12-29}}</ref> Established by Prem Prakash, it was the first agency in India to syndicate video news<ref>{{cite book|url=https://books.google.com/books?id=YsJlAgAAQBAJ&pg=PA16|title=Web Journalism-The Craft & Technology|last1=Saxena|first1=Sunil|publisher=Tata McGraw-Hill Education|isbn=9780070680838|page=16|language=en}}</ref> and {{As of|2019||df=US|alt=as of 2019}}, is the biggest television news agency in India. | ||
| == History == | == History == | ||
| ⚫ | {{Unbalanced section|date=July 2020}} | ||
| === Establishment and early years (1971-2000) === | === Establishment and early years (1971-2000) === | ||
| Prem |
Prem started his career in the field of photography, before being employed by ] (as well as ]) as a photojournalist, where he went on to cover some of the most significant historical events in post-Independence India.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://caravanmagazine.in/reportage/ani-reports-government-version-truth|title=The Image Makers : How ANI Reports The Government's Version Of Truth|last=Donthi|first=Praveen|date=1 March 2019|website=]|language=en|url-access=subscription|access-date=2019-12-07}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web|url=https://the-ken.com/story/ani-video-news-monopoly/|title=How ANI quietly built a monopoly|last=Ahluwalia|first=Harveen|last2=Srivilasan|first2=Pranav|date=2018-10-21|website=The Ken|language=en-US|url-access=subscription|access-date=2019-12-28}}</ref> A significant figure in the domain of news and documentary film-making in the 1970s, he commanded considerable respect among foreign journalists and film-makers, and were conferred with the ].<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> | ||
| In 1971, Prem established ANI ( |
In 1971, Prem established ANI (then, TVNF, India’s first television news feature agency) which gained extraordinary influence within the Congress Government.<ref name=":0" /> TVNF played a key role in fulfilling ]'s wishes of showcasing a positive image of India, having produced numerous films for ], and went on to gain a monopoly in the sector.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| Smita Prakash, an alumna of ] joined ANI in around 1986 as an intern and was later inducted as a full-time employee.<ref name=":0" /> Daughter of Inna Ramamohan Rao, former director of the ], she married Prem's son Sanjiv in 1988 which furthered ANI's access within the government.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> |
Smita Prakash, an alumna of ] joined ANI in around 1986 as an intern and was later inducted as a full-time employee.<ref name=":0" /> Daughter of Inna Ramamohan Rao, former director of the ], she married Prem's son Sanjiv in 1988 which furthered ANI's access within the government.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> ] notes that for decades, ANI effectively served as the external publicity division of ], showing the Army in a positive light and suppressing news about any internal discontent; the private nature of the organisation and the repute of its founder gave an air of non-partisan legitimacy to their videos.<ref name=":0" /> During the peak-spans of militancy in ], ANI was the near-sole purveyor of video-footage, esp. with Rao having been recruited as the media advisor to the state.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| ⚫ | === Later years (2000-present) === | ||
| ⚫ | By 2000, India had seen a boom of private 24X7 news channels; however, unsustainable revenue models meant that they did not have the capacity to hire video-reporters across the country.<ref name=":0" /> This provided scope for massive expansion of ANI's domestic video-production capacities |
||
| In 1993, Reuters purchased a stake in ANI, and it was allowed to exert a complete monopoly over Reuters feed as to India.<ref name="":0"" /> | |||
| ⚫ | In 2000, the ] government launched a Kashmir-based regional channel—], and ANI was allowed to produce its programs.<ref name="":0"" /><ref name="":1"" /> By the end of 2005, ANI's business-model was faring impressively on a consistent basis and it shifted its office out of Gole Market, to a new five-storey building in ].<ref name="":0"" /> ANI continued to be trusted by the upcoming ] governments, to the extent of MEA choosing Smita to be a part of the two-member-strong contingent of Indian journalists at both of the joint press conferences between the incumbent prime ministers of India and USA.<ref name="":0"" /> | ||
| ⚫ | === Later years (2000-present) === | ||
| ⚫ | In later 2000s, increasing charges of ANI feed and low quality of journalism coupled with the introduction of ] led to several national and regional channels unsubscribing them.<ref name="":0"" /> |
||
| ⚫ | Along the 90s, Sanjiv had a meteoric rise through the ranks (along with Smita) with his shrewd managerial instincts.<ref name="":0"" /> By 2000, India had seen a boom of private 24X7 news channels; however, unsustainable revenue models meant that they did not have the capacity to hire video-reporters across the country.<ref name=":0" /> This provided the scope for a massive expansion of ANI's domestic video-production capacities.<ref name=":0" /> Asian Films TV was incorporated in 2000 to provide feed for newspapers and periodicals.<ref name=":1" /> ] though notes that most of its foot-soldiers were low-cost recruits, who had little to do with journalism.<ref name=":0" /> | ||
| ⚫ | In 2000, the ] government launched a Kashmir-based regional channel—], and ANI was allowed to produce its programs.<ref name="":0"" /><ref name="":1"" /> By the end of 2005, ANI's business-model was faring impressively on a consistent basis and it shifted its office out of Gole Market, to a new five-storey building in ].<ref name="":0"" /> ANI continued to be trusted by the upcoming ] governments, to the extent of MEA choosing Smita to be a part of the two-member-strong contingent of Indian journalists at both of the joint press conferences between the incumbent prime ministers of India and USA.<ref name="":0"" /> ANI is also believed to have played significant roles as allies of the ], India's external intelligence agency; many of its videos depicted protests by fringe lobby groups and activists, on the aspects of human rights abuse in Pakistan.<ref name="":0"" /> | ||
| By late 2011, ANI accounted for about 99% of the Reuters feed and in FY 2017–18, they were paid ₹ 2.54 crore for the services.<ref name="":1"" /> Archive videos were sold at rates as high as ₹ 1000 per second; in FY 2017–18, the firm reported revenues of ₹ 68.23 crore and a net profit of ₹ 9.91 crore.<ref name="":1"" /> | |||
| ⚫ | In later 2000s, increasing charges of ANI feed and low quality of journalism coupled with the introduction of ] led to several national and regional channels unsubscribing them.<ref name="":0"" /> In 2010, UNI TV was launched by ] as a competitor and it gave stiff competition.<ref name="":0"" /> However, Ishan Prakash, Smita's son who joined the company in 2011, procured multiple units of ], a pioneer technology which were an advancement over OB vans and far more portable.<ref name="":0"" /> The agency also expanded its overseas bureaus and enlisted into contracts with multiple state governments and multiple union ministries.<ref name="":0"" /><ref name="":1"" /> A monopoly was again re-created and most of its competitors shut down, eventually.<ref name="":0"" /> By late 2011, ANI accounted for about 99% of the Reuters feed and in FY 2017–18, they were paid ₹ 2.54 crore for the services.<ref name="":1"" /> | ||
| ⚫ | ==Controversies== | ||
| ⚫ | {{Unbalanced section|date=July 2020}} | ||
| ⚫ | Under a new management, ANI has been accused of practicing an even-aggressive journalism model focused at maximum revenue output, where journalists were easily dispensable with.<ref name="":0"" /><ref name="":1"" /> Archive videos were sold at rates as high as ₹ 1000 per second; in FY 2017–18, the firm reported revenues of ₹ 68.23 crore and a net profit of ₹ 9.91 crore.<ref name="":1"" /> Multiple employees have accused ANI of not having any human resource management system and ill-treating their ex-employees.<ref name="":0"" /> ] as well as ] notes of the agency to have grown even closer to the government after ] was elected to power in 2014; its effects have ranged from sympathetic covering of the BJP party-campaigns to the farthest possible extent to reporters being highly confrontational, when dealing with politicians from opposition parties.<ref name="":0"" /><ref name="":1"" /> Smita has been widely accused of conducting favorable interviews for the party.<ref name="":0"" /><ref>{{Cite news|url=https://www.theguardian.com/world/2019/jan/05/indian-pm-narendra-modi-lampooned-for-manufactured-interview|title=Indian PM lampooned for 'manufactured' interview|last=Dhillon|first=Amrit|date=2019-01-05|work=The Guardian|access-date=2019-12-29|language=en-GB|issn=0261-3077}}</ref> | ||
| === Propaganda === | |||
| Long-form reports by ] and ], along with reports by other media watchdogs have detailed of the agency having served as a propaganda tool of the incumbent union government.<ref name="":0"" /><ref name="":1"" /><ref name=":0">{{Cite web|last=Tiwari|first=Ayush|date=18 September 2019|title=Meet ANI’s ‘European experts’ on Kashmir. They're experts all right — just not on Kashmir|url=https://www.newslaundry.com/2019/09/18/ani-news-european-experts-kashmir|access-date=4 January 2019|website=Newslaundry}}</ref> | |||
| ⚫ | ANI has been also accused of ] events, by ] certified by the ]'s International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), including ].<ref name="":0"" /><ref>{{Cite web|url=https://www.altnews.in/ani-a-tale-of-inadvertent-errors-and-oversights/|title=ANI - A tale of inadvertent errors and oversights|last=Chaudhuri|first=Pooja|date=2018-10-21|website=Alt News|language=en-GB|access-date=2019-12-28}}</ref> ] came across several video footages from ANI, wherein logos of random television channels from Pakistan along with Urdu tickers were superimposed on news showcasing India in a positive light; their video editors have admitted to forging clips.<ref name="":0"" /> Long-form reports by ] and ], along with reports by other media watchdogs have detailed of the agency having served as a propaganda tool of the incumbent union government.<ref name="":0"" /><ref name="":1"" /><ref name=":0">{{Cite web|url=https://www.newslaundry.com/2019/09/18/ani-news-european-experts-kashmir|title=Meet ANI’s ‘European experts’ on Kashmir. They're experts all right — just not on Kashmir|last=Tiwari|first=Ayush|date=18 September 2019|website=Newslaundry|access-date=4 January 2019}}</ref> | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| ⚫ | ==Controversies== | ||
| In 2020, an investigation by EU DisinfoLab concluded that ANI had on multiple occasions published mostly ] and sometimes anti-China opinion pieces and news content, including opinion pieces falsely attributed to European politicians and other instances of disinformation, and that this material was known to have been sourced from a vast network of pro-India ] run by |
In 2020, an investigation by the ''EU DisinfoLab'' concluded that ANI had on multiple occasions published mostly ] and sometimes anti-China opinion pieces and news content, including opinion pieces falsely attributed to European politicians and other instances of disinformation, and that this material was known to have been sourced from a vast network of pro-India ] run by the Srivasta Group.<ref name="BBC4">{{cite news|url=https://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-55232432|title=The dead professor and the vast pro-India disinformation campaign|work=BBC|first=Abid|last=Hussain|first2=Shruti|last2=Menon|date=10 December 2020|accessdate=10 December 2020|quote=The network was designed primarily to "discredit Pakistan internationally" and influence decision-making at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and European Parliament, EU DisinfoLab said.}}</ref><ref name="Kayali">{{cite news|url=https://www.politico.eu/article/india-pakistan-website-european-parliament-campaign-eu-chronicle-china/|title=New pro-India EU website enrolling MEPs campaigns against Pakistan|work=Politico|date=9 December 2020|accessdate=9 December 2020|first=Saim|last=Saeed|first2=Laura|last2=Kayali}}</ref> The report noted that mainstream Indian news media regularly relies on content provided by ANI, and that ANI had on several occasions provided legitimacy and coverage to the entire "influence operation" run by the fake news network, which relied "more on ANI than on any other distribution channel" "both credibility and a wide reach to its content".<ref name="BBC4"/> A primary aim of this fake news coverage was to "discredit Pakistan" in international forums.<ref name="BBC4"/> | ||
| === Disinformation === | |||
| ⚫ | ANI has been also accused of ] events, by ] certified by the ]'s International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), including ].<ref name="":0"" /><ref>{{Cite web |
||
| === Miscellaneous === | |||
| Under a new management, ANI has been accused of practicing an aggressive model of journalism focused at maximum revenue output, where journalists were easily dispensable with.<ref name="":0"" /><ref name="":1"" /> Multiple employees have accused ANI of not having any human resource management system and ill-treating their ex-employees.<ref name="":0"" /> | |||
| ==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Revision as of 05:59, 12 December 2020
Indian news agency
 | |
| Company type | News agency |
|---|---|
| Industry | Media, news media |
| Founded | December 9, 1971; 53 years ago (1971-12-09) in New Delhi, India |
| Founder | Prem Prakash |
| Headquarters | New Delhi |
| Area served | India, South Asia |
| Key people | |
| Owner | ANI Media Private Limited |
| Website | aninews |
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "Asian News International" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2020) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Asian News International (ANI) is an Indian news agency based in R. K. Puram, New Delhi that offers syndicated multimedia news feed to plethora of news-bureaus in India and beyond. Established by Prem Prakash, it was the first agency in India to syndicate video news and as of 2019, is the biggest television news agency in India.
History
 | This section may be unbalanced towards certain viewpoints. Please improve the article or discuss the issue on the talk page. (July 2020) |
Establishment and early years (1971-2000)
Prem started his career in the field of photography, before being employed by Visnews (as well as Reuters) as a photojournalist, where he went on to cover some of the most significant historical events in post-Independence India. A significant figure in the domain of news and documentary film-making in the 1970s, he commanded considerable respect among foreign journalists and film-makers, and were conferred with the MBE.
In 1971, Prem established ANI (then, TVNF, India’s first television news feature agency) which gained extraordinary influence within the Congress Government. TVNF played a key role in fulfilling Indira Gandhi's wishes of showcasing a positive image of India, having produced numerous films for Doordarshan, and went on to gain a monopoly in the sector.
Smita Prakash, an alumna of Indian Institute of Mass Communication joined ANI in around 1986 as an intern and was later inducted as a full-time employee. Daughter of Inna Ramamohan Rao, former director of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, she married Prem's son Sanjiv in 1988 which furthered ANI's access within the government. The Caravan notes that for decades, ANI effectively served as the external publicity division of Ministry of External Affairs, showing the Army in a positive light and suppressing news about any internal discontent; the private nature of the organisation and the repute of its founder gave an air of non-partisan legitimacy to their videos. During the peak-spans of militancy in Kashmir Conflict, ANI was the near-sole purveyor of video-footage, esp. with Rao having been recruited as the media advisor to the state.
In 1993, Reuters purchased a stake in ANI, and it was allowed to exert a complete monopoly over Reuters feed as to India.
Later years (2000-present)
Along the 90s, Sanjiv had a meteoric rise through the ranks (along with Smita) with his shrewd managerial instincts. By 2000, India had seen a boom of private 24X7 news channels; however, unsustainable revenue models meant that they did not have the capacity to hire video-reporters across the country. This provided the scope for a massive expansion of ANI's domestic video-production capacities. Asian Films TV was incorporated in 2000 to provide feed for newspapers and periodicals. The Caravan though notes that most of its foot-soldiers were low-cost recruits, who had little to do with journalism.
In 2000, the NDA government launched a Kashmir-based regional channel—DD Kashir, and ANI was allowed to produce its programs. By the end of 2005, ANI's business-model was faring impressively on a consistent basis and it shifted its office out of Gole Market, to a new five-storey building in R.K. Puram. ANI continued to be trusted by the upcoming UPA governments, to the extent of MEA choosing Smita to be a part of the two-member-strong contingent of Indian journalists at both of the joint press conferences between the incumbent prime ministers of India and USA. ANI is also believed to have played significant roles as allies of the Research and Analysis Wing, India's external intelligence agency; many of its videos depicted protests by fringe lobby groups and activists, on the aspects of human rights abuse in Pakistan.
In later 2000s, increasing charges of ANI feed and low quality of journalism coupled with the introduction of broadcast vans led to several national and regional channels unsubscribing them. In 2010, UNI TV was launched by Yashwant Deshmukh as a competitor and it gave stiff competition. However, Ishan Prakash, Smita's son who joined the company in 2011, procured multiple units of LiveU, a pioneer technology which were an advancement over OB vans and far more portable. The agency also expanded its overseas bureaus and enlisted into contracts with multiple state governments and multiple union ministries. A monopoly was again re-created and most of its competitors shut down, eventually. By late 2011, ANI accounted for about 99% of the Reuters feed and in FY 2017–18, they were paid ₹ 2.54 crore for the services.
Under a new management, ANI has been accused of practicing an even-aggressive journalism model focused at maximum revenue output, where journalists were easily dispensable with. Archive videos were sold at rates as high as ₹ 1000 per second; in FY 2017–18, the firm reported revenues of ₹ 68.23 crore and a net profit of ₹ 9.91 crore. Multiple employees have accused ANI of not having any human resource management system and ill-treating their ex-employees. The Caravan as well as The Ken notes of the agency to have grown even closer to the government after Bharatiya Janata Party was elected to power in 2014; its effects have ranged from sympathetic covering of the BJP party-campaigns to the farthest possible extent to reporters being highly confrontational, when dealing with politicians from opposition parties. Smita has been widely accused of conducting favorable interviews for the party.
ANI has been also accused of misreporting events, by fact checkers certified by the Poynter Institute's International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), including Alt News. The Caravan came across several video footages from ANI, wherein logos of random television channels from Pakistan along with Urdu tickers were superimposed on news showcasing India in a positive light; their video editors have admitted to forging clips. Long-form reports by The Caravan and The Ken, along with reports by other media watchdogs have detailed of the agency having served as a propaganda tool of the incumbent union government.
Controversies
In 2020, an investigation by the EU DisinfoLab concluded that ANI had on multiple occasions published mostly anti-Pakistan and sometimes anti-China opinion pieces and news content, including opinion pieces falsely attributed to European politicians and other instances of disinformation, and that this material was known to have been sourced from a vast network of pro-India fake news websites run by the Srivasta Group. The report noted that mainstream Indian news media regularly relies on content provided by ANI, and that ANI had on several occasions provided legitimacy and coverage to the entire "influence operation" run by the fake news network, which relied "more on ANI than on any other distribution channel" "both credibility and a wide reach to its content". A primary aim of this fake news coverage was to "discredit Pakistan" in international forums.
See also
- Press Trust of India, the other leading news agency based in India
References
- "ANI MEDIA PRIVATE LIMITED - Company, directors and contact details". zaubacorp.com. Retrieved 22 June 2018.
- "Terms & Conditions". aninews.in.
- Shrivastava, K. M. (2007). News Agencies from Pigeon to Internet. Sterling Publishers Pvt. Ltd. ISBN 9781932705676.
- Paterson, Chris A.; Sreberny, Annabelle (2004). International News in the 21st Century. Georgetown University Press. p. 122. ISBN 9781860205965.
- "Footaging It Fleetly". Outlook India Magazine. Retrieved 2019-12-29.
- Saxena, Sunil. Web Journalism-The Craft & Technology. Tata McGraw-Hill Education. p. 16. ISBN 9780070680838.
- ^ Donthi, Praveen (1 March 2019). "The Image Makers : How ANI Reports The Government's Version Of Truth". The Caravan. Retrieved 2019-12-07.
- ^ Ahluwalia, Harveen; Srivilasan, Pranav (2018-10-21). "How ANI quietly built a monopoly". The Ken. Retrieved 2019-12-28.
- Dhillon, Amrit (2019-01-05). "Indian PM lampooned for 'manufactured' interview". The Guardian. ISSN 0261-3077. Retrieved 2019-12-29.
- Chaudhuri, Pooja (2018-10-21). "ANI - A tale of inadvertent errors and oversights". Alt News. Retrieved 2019-12-28.
- Tiwari, Ayush (18 September 2019). "Meet ANI's 'European experts' on Kashmir. They're experts all right — just not on Kashmir". Newslaundry. Retrieved 4 January 2019.
- ^ Hussain, Abid; Menon, Shruti (10 December 2020). "The dead professor and the vast pro-India disinformation campaign". BBC. Retrieved 10 December 2020.
The network was designed primarily to "discredit Pakistan internationally" and influence decision-making at the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and European Parliament, EU DisinfoLab said.
- Saeed, Saim; Kayali, Laura (9 December 2020). "New pro-India EU website enrolling MEPs campaigns against Pakistan". Politico. Retrieved 9 December 2020.
